Hi,
I just loaded XFree86-4 from the ports tree on my
laptop, running 5.2.1-RELEASE.
It took about 2.5 gigs of space to compile and add it
all.
Let's say I have a small hard drive in an old laptop,
and let's also assume that I am just loading X to just
have a simple GUI to run opera and
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Joe Schmoe wrote:
Hi,
I just loaded XFree86-4 from the ports tree on my
laptop, running 5.2.1-RELEASE.
It took about 2.5 gigs of space to compile and add it
all.
Let's say I have a small hard drive in an old laptop,
and let's also assume that I am just loading X to just
have a
On Jun 25, 2004, at 5:21 PM, Joe Schmoe wrote:
What are some options I can add to the standard `make
install` command for that port to significantly reduce
the size of X ?
Any general comments on making a smaller/faster/more
efficient X for an old laptop are greatly appreciated.
X11 doesn't really
On Saturday 26 June 2004 06:51, Joe Schmoe wrote:
Hi,
I just loaded XFree86-4 from the ports tree on my
laptop, running 5.2.1-RELEASE.
It took about 2.5 gigs of space to compile and add it
all.
Let's say I have a small hard drive in an old laptop,
and let's also assume that I am just
