On 2012.11.18 09:58, Gary Kline wrote:
I probably should cc the hardward guys about this. first, see if it
geta any traction here, tho. my tech guy got me a Delll 3010
that has an improved [[meaning screwed up]] BIOS with some
hardware mess called the UEFI.
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:49:46 +0100, Lucas B. Cohen wrote:
On 2012.11.18 09:58, Gary Kline wrote:
I probably should cc the hardward guys about this. first, see if it
geta any traction here, tho. my tech guy got me a Delll 3010
that has an improved [[meaning screwed up]]
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the series of bizarre UEFI bugs
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20187.html
That doesn't appear to be a bug. It appears that the code is doing
exactly what the designer wanted it
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the series of bizarre UEFI bugs
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20187.html
That doesn't appear to be a bug. It appears that
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the series of bizarre UEFI bugs
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20187.html
That
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:18:32PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the series of bizarre UEFI bugs
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:30:44AM -0500, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon 2012-11-19 07:55:16 UTC-0500, Daniel Feenberg (feenb...@nber.org) wrote:
The only way for FreeBSD (or Linux, for that matter) to survive in a
world where hardware vendors care only about Windows, is to make sure
that FreeBSD only depends upon features that Windows uses.
In a world
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:27:52 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
answer me this, daniel or anybody else:: isn't there a very small
group who is devoted to creating a 100% open/free hardware and
software? maybe 64-bit only to start? most of us who are still
alive and contributing
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:46:45AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:27:52 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
answer me this, daniel or anybody else:: isn't there a very small
group who is devoted to creating a 100% open/free hardware and
software? maybe 64-bit only to
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:35:15 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:46:45AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:27:52 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
answer me this, daniel or anybody else:: isn't there a very small
group who is devoted to creating a 100% open/free
I probably should cc the hardward guys about this. first, see if it
geta any traction here, tho. my tech guy got me a Delll 3010
that has an improved [[meaning screwed up]] BIOS with some
hardware mess called the UEFI.
Trying to get ssh to work
14 matches
Mail list logo
