On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:48:33 +0200
Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
Anyway there was no other way to avoid a long fsck (until SU+Journal
in 9.0).
Speaking of SU+J:
I do happen to be running 9.0-BETA1, and am seeing output from fsck
where it at first appears it's going to take
Le Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:43:41 -0500,
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net a écrit :
Hello,
I'm assuming there are definite advantages to using gjournal over
softupdates?
If the file system is large, it avoids a very long fsck.
I use gjournal since 7.2 and never had any problem (and I always
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.org wrote:
Le Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:43:41 -0500,
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net a écrit :
Hello,
I'm assuming there are definite advantages to using gjournal over
softupdates?
Le Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:18:26 -0400,
Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org a écrit :
hello,
I'm assuming there are definite advantages to using gjournal over
softupdates?
http://www.usenix.org/event/usenix2000/general/seltzer.html
gjournal can improve the performances in some cases (small
Is there any way to enable gjournal on an already existing filesystem
without destroying it?
I'm assuming there are definite advantages to using gjournal over
softupdates?
--
Conrad J. Sabatier
conr...@cox.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
Is there any way to enable gjournal on an already existing filesystem
without destroying it?
You can't really(it can be done but requires exception circumstance). If
you didn't take these steps during initial install
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
Is there any way to enable gjournal on an already existing
filesystem without destroying it?
Yes, provided the existing filesystem is not using the last block
of its provider (partition), but you'll have to put the journal on
a separate provider from
