El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 03:31:16PM +0200, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
Meanwhile I did:
# cp -Rp ~guru/PKGDIR/mnt
# PKG_PATH=/PKGDIR
# export PKG_PATH
# chroot /mnt pkg_add xorg-7.7
# chroot /mnt pkg_add kde-4.10.5
# chroot /mnt pkg_add vim-7.3.1314
...
# chroot
Hello,
I have prepared a boot-able USB-key (to be exactly a disk image of it)
the usual way:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=da0 bs=8m count=1868
# mdconfig -a -t vnode -f da0
md0
# fdisk -I md0
# fdisk -B md0
# bsdlabel -w md0s1 auto
# bsdlabel -B md0s1
# bsdlabel -e md0s1 # edit the disk label and
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
in /mnt. What would be the best method for this? Run pkg_add with the
flag --chroot chrootdir, or use chroot(8) directly? Or any other idea?
Thanks in advance
All
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 07:58:06AM -0500, Mark Felder escribió:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
in /mnt. What would be the best method for this? Run pkg_add with the
flag --chroot
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 8:07, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 07:58:06AM -0500, Mark Felder
escribió:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 6:16, Matthias Apitz wrote:
So far so good. Now I want install the packages as well into the image
in /mnt. What would be the
El día Tuesday, October 08, 2013 a las 08:12:31AM -0500, Mark Felder escribió:
No. The r255948 was built on a clean, empty environment but with
$ cat /etc/src.conf
WITH_PKGTOOLS=yes
Ok, I won't question your needs for pkg_* as you seem to be aware of
what you're doing :-)
When
What is a fdescfs file-descriptor file system?
Is it still a normal part of 9.1?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr
Hi :)
is it possible to mount Linux ext3 file systems with fstab by label?
Before I run mount -a /mnt/dump had the same permissions, owner and group
as /mnt/archlinux has got. Is it possible to keep this? Both are Linux
ext3 fs. Mounting without a label does work.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
is it possible to mount Linux ext3 file systems with fstab by label?
Before I run mount -a /mnt/dump had the same permissions, owner and group as
/mnt/archlinux has got. Is it possible to keep this? Both are Linux ext3 fs.
Mounting without a label does
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com writes:
Hi :)
is it possible to mount Linux ext3 file systems with fstab by label?
Before I run mount -a /mnt/dump had the same permissions, owner and
group as /mnt/archlinux has got. Is it possible to keep this? Both are
Linux ext3 fs. Mounting
Hi all,
I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be using 2
disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
I have gone through some of the documentation and would like to know what
file systems to choose.
According to the docs, ufs is suggested for the system partitions but
On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:49 AM, yudi v wrote:
I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be using 2
disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
I have gone through some of the documentation and would like to know what
file systems to choose.
According to the docs, ufs
On 2012-12-21 11:28, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 12/21/12 14:06, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Dec 21, 2012, at 7:49 AM, yudi v wrote:
I am building a new freebsd fileserver to use for backups, will be
using 2
disk raid mirroring in a HP microserver n40l.
I have gone through some of the documentation and
for 'ufs' since I have zfs. My
guesses just generate similar to 'directories unknown' My disk is also
gpt. If I leave out the file system type after -t my machine apparently
accepts a command to do something, but it of course does not do what is
needed.
Thanks
If you're going to run advanced
to understand what is wrong.
thanks
On 9/29/12, Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
s m sam.gh1...@gmail.com wrote:
I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore
this dump file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my
file system) but do not know
thanks saeedeh
OK i try to explain what i have done more in detail.
i want to restore unencrypted dump files on an encrypted file system.
in order to do that, i encrypted my file system by geli command and
sure that is done correctly because when i install base and kernel on
it, freebsd start up
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:09 AM, s m sam.gh1...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks saeedeh
OK i try to explain what i have done more in detail.
i want to restore unencrypted dump files on an encrypted file system.
in order to do that, i encrypted my file system by geli command and
sure that is done
hello guys,
I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore
this dump file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my
file system) but do not know how to do that.
is there any way or command to restore an unencrypted dump on an
encrypted file system? i tried
s m sam.gh1...@gmail.com wrote:
I backed up my freeBSD 8.2 box by dump command and now want to restore
this dump file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my
file system) but do not know how to do that.
is there any way or command to restore an unencrypted dump
file on an encrypted file system (i used geli to encrypt my
file system) but do not know how to do that.
is there any way or command to restore an unencrypted dump on an
encrypted file system? i tried to restore my dump file as when file
system is unencrypted.
Can you read the files after
on Wed Sep 19 04:15:02 2012
fsck_ffs /dev/ada0p9
just to make sure: the partition was not mounted when you started fsck?
Now I wonder if the file system is really fixed, with possibly some
files in /pkgsrc subdirectories lost, or if the hard drive is
starting to fail.
You see it soon. I
I have or had a problem with a file system (FreeBSD UFS2) messed up, either by
errant software or system freeze/crash.
I successfully cross-compiled, from FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE, a NetBSD 5.1_STABLE
i386 system to install on 8 GB USB stick.
I have both the NetBSD system source as well as pkgsrc
, 4638292 used, 21162419 free (61643 frags, 2637597 blocks,
0.2% fragmentation)
* FILE SYSTEM STILL DIRTY *
* PLEASE RERUN FSCK *
Script done on Wed Sep 19 04:17:27 2012
Would this indicate a software bug, or is my Western Digital Caviar Green
3 TB hard drive failing
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:05:06 -0400
Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.com wrote:
Script started on Wed Sep 19 04:15:02 2012
fsck_ffs /dev/ada0p9
just to make sure: the partition was not mounted when you started fsck?
Now I wonder if the file system is really fixed, with possibly some
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better
than any other?
Just curious. I'm getting ready to setup a new box running FreeBSD 9, and
since I'm starting from scratch, I'm questioning all my
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better
than any other?
Use stock UFS, just configure it properly. most importantly noatime.
Amount of cached data is more important than hit count. Unless
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500
Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better
than any other?
That's an average of about 3 hits per
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500
From: Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com
To: FreeBSD Questions List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Best file system for a busy webserver
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month
--On August 16, 2012 6:02:57 PM +0100 Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500
Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system
Paul Schmehl writes:
That's an average of about 3 hits per second. If it's static pages
then pretty much anything will handle it easily (but please don't use
FAT). If it's dynamic then the whole problem is more complex than a
simple page rate. If that load is bursty it may make a
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:16:26 -0500
Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
--On August 16, 2012 6:02:57 PM +0100 Steve O'Hara-Smith
st...@sohara.org wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:45:25 -0500
Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on which file
--On August 16, 2012 9:42:30 PM +0100 Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org
wrote:
I don't even know where to begin. There's about 15G of data on the
server.
OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this
purpose. You'd save a bit of time in crash recovery with no
On 08/16/2012 01:16 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably
better than any other?
With only 15G of data, I'd recommend
OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this
another ZFS fanatics. it is about performance.
direction for a filesystem, at 15GB if performance ever becomes a problem a
RAID1 of SSDs with UFS would make it fly probably into the hundreds of hits
per second range.
the OCZ Vertex IIIs (About $1/G these days) wired into a *hardware*
RAID controller setup to mirror them. This gives you blazing speed
just like i would read some popular street PC newspaper.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.comwrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on which file system is best for a busy
webserver (7 million hits/month)? Is anyone one system noticeably better
than any other?
Just curious. I'm getting ready to setup a new box
Hi List.
I'm using
fusefs_enable=YES
in /etc/rc.conf
And
/dev/ad4s2 /home/mnt/windows ntfs rw,noauto 0 0
in /etc/fstab
I can read the NTFS file system and copy from it but I can't copy to it.
When I try copying I get
No such file or directory
Is that default
On 08/09/2012 13:37, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Hi List.
I'm using
fusefs_enable=YES
in /etc/rc.conf
And
/dev/ad4s2 /home/mnt/windows ntfs rw,noauto 0 0
in /etc/fstab
I can read the NTFS file system and copy from it but I can't copy to it.
When I try copying I get
alternatively - use tar.
What I was trying to achieve, which I haven't done yet, was a smallish dump of the
core system. By that I mean system + ports, without distfiles, etc. Then a
separate dump of user data, which is considerably larger. At this point I am thinking I
should do this:
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated there was
no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now trying to build a
backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate /var and /tmp.
I had originally set the nodump flag on /tmp and /var, so my snapshot is
On 06/16/12 10:19, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated there
was no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now trying to
build a backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate /var and /tmp.
I had originally set the
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated there was
no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now trying to build a
backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate /var and /tmp.
I had originally set the nodump flag on /tmp and /var, so my snapshot is
Would rsync or cpdup from single user mode cover your needs? Should cover
everything and then you can just reboot into your newly partitioned system.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
2012-06-07 22:05, Gary Aitken skrev:
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated there was
no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now trying to build a
backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate /var and /tmp.
I had originally set the nodump
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
When I originally set up my SSD, the stuff I was following indicated
there was no need to put anythng on a separate filesystem. I'm now
trying to build a backup system on a usb drive and I want a separate
/var and /tmp.
I had originally set the nodump
(Linux)
Ext3 file system
UUID D1A7E6D6-3A34-4864-B6E8-C4DAA34AD776 (DCE, v4)
Last mounted at /
Volume size 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 929754 blocks of 4 KiB)
Partition 2: 227.5 MiB (238533120 bytes, 465885 sectors from
7438095)
Type 0x05 (Extended)
Partition 5
partitions
Partition c: 2.145 GiB (2302711808 bytes, 4497484 sectors from 0)
Type 0 (Unused)
DOS/MBR partition map
Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
UUID D1A7E6D6-3A34-4864-B6E8-C4DAA34AD776 (DCE, v4)
Last
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:12:41 +0200
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
No mention of ext3 there, nor from find (above).
.. so you May be out of luck ..
ext3 is ext2+journalling. If fsck supports ext3, then it can sync the
journal and the partition can be safely mounted as ext2.
It's a long time since
Hi,
Reference:
From: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:13:19 +0100
Message-id: 20120418141319.7cb8c...@gumby.homeunix.com
RW wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:12:41 +0200
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
No mention of ext3 there, nor from find (above).
sectors from 0)
Type 0 (Unused)
DOS/MBR partition map
Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
UUID D1A7E6D6-3A34-4864-B6E8-C4DAA34AD776 (DCE, v4)
Last mounted at /
Volume size 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 929754
disklabel (at sector 1), 8 partitions
Partition c: 2.145 GiB (2302711808 bytes, 4497484 sectors from 0)
Type 0 (Unused)
DOS/MBR partition map
Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
UUID D1A7E6D6-3A34-4864-B6E8
partition map
Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
UUID D1A7E6D6-3A34-4864-B6E8-C4DAA34AD776 (DCE, v4)
Last mounted at /
Volume size 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 929754 blocks of 4 KiB)
Partition 2: 227.5 MiB
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:06:44PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi Odhiambo,
man mount
mount fstype device mount-point
Yes, but look:
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
mount: /dev/da1a : Invalid argument
I don't know why !?
Thanks,
: 2.145 GiB (2302711808 bytes, 4497484 sectors from 0)
Type 0 (Unused)
DOS/MBR partition map
Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
UUID D1A7E6D6-3A34-4864-B6E8-C4DAA34AD776 (DCE, v4)
Last mounted at /
Volume size 3.547
boot2/BTX 1.02 at sector 2)
BSD disklabel (at sector 1), 8 partitions
Partition c: 2.145 GiB (2302711808 bytes, 4497484 sectors from 0)
Type 0 (Unused)
DOS/MBR partition map
Partition 1: 3.547 GiB (3808272384 bytes, 7438032 sectors from 63)
Type 0x83 (Linux)
Ext3 file system
UUID
I don't know why !?
Is ext2fs.ko loaded? Does /var/log/messages reveal anything?
Yes :
casa# kldstat | grep ext
91 0xc8806000 1ext2fs.ko
casa#
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs /dev/da1a /mnt/JetFlash\ Transcend\ 4GB\ 1100/
mount: /dev/da1a : Invalid argument
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 06:25:29PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
Hi Adam,
I don't know why !?
Is ext2fs.ko loaded? Does /var/log/messages reveal anything?
Yes :
casa# kldstat | grep ext
91 0xc8806000 1ext2fs.ko
casa#
I try:
casa# mount -t ext2fs
- Forwarded message from Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de -
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 19:52:40 +0200
From: Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de
To: commun...@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: microSD ext3 file system
Hello,
After some hours of testing I'm now totally lost with creating an ext3
file
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
I have some trouble with a microSD card (or with the controler) in my
Linux based cellphone (Openmoko Freerunner). One of the hints I got is
to check the microSD card with a Linux tool badblocks(8)
On 28/02/2012 02:21, Robert Banfield wrote:
I have some additional information that I didnt see before actually
digging into the log file. It is quite interesting. There are 82,206
subdirectories in one of the folders. Like this:
/zfs_mount/directoryA/token[1-82206]/various_tileset_files
Summary: I am executing the command find . ../file_list and it is
not traversing all the subdirectories it encounters along the way.
There is no separate file system mounted along the path.
Long version: I'm new to FreeBSD and ZFS (many years of linux
experience though), so my apologies
, and there is no networked
file system anywhere in the mix. I'm using the version of find
installed with FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE amd64.
cd /zfs_mount_point/mydir
find . ../file_list
I would presume that file_list contains a list of every file and
directory inside of /zfs_mount_point/mydir, however
On 02/27/2012 05:53 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
These are all actual directories -- no symbolic link or anything like
that? I assume permissions are not the problem? All directories have
at least mode r_x for your user id? (Hmmm... but you are logged in as
root -- can't be that then.) How
On 02/27/2012 09:21 PM, Robert Banfield wrote:
ls -R appears to be traversing all subdirectories.
Scratch that... ls -R fails to traverse the same directories that find
does.
Is there a subdirectory limit in ZFS?
___
from darc...@gmail.com (Denise H. G.):
I strongly advise that /usr and /usr/local reside on different
partitions. Furthermore, If you plan to run a desktop environment, your
/usr/local should be big enough, say 8G - 10G, to hold all stuff you
built from the ports. And putting /var on a
On 2011/11/20 at 19:25, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
from darc...@gmail.com (Denise H. G.):
I strongly advise that /usr and /usr/local reside on different
partitions. Furthermore, If you plan to run a desktop environment,
your /usr/local should be big enough, say 8G -
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:25:35AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
from darc...@gmail.com (Denise H. G.):
I strongly advise that /usr and /usr/local reside on different
partitions. Furthermore, If you plan to run a desktop environment, your
/usr/local should be big enough, say 8G - 10G, to
Hi!
One more question before I start installing FreeBSD 9.0 RC-2.
Now we have a new bsdinstall and as I red and if I understood correct there is
also SU journaling file sistem. I will switch to the GPT partion. If I want to
have SU-j file system is it enough that I just choose this option
SU-j file system is it enough that I just choose this option and voila?
Yes. I think so. 'options UFS_GJOURNAL' is present in GENERIC kernel
config. If you use GENERIC kernel, it is there.
And another question is about ports. There is an option ports tree which is
marked default. It is okay
sistem. I will switch to
the GPT partion. If I want to have SU-j file system is it enough
that I just choose this option and voila?
Yes. I think so. 'options UFS_GJOURNAL' is present in GENERIC kernel
config. If you use GENERIC kernel, it is there.
UFS_GJOURNAL is for gjournal not soft-update
. I will switch to the GPT
partion. If I want to have SU-j file system is it enough that I just
choose this option and voila?
Yes. I think so. 'options UFS_GJOURNAL' is present in GENERIC kernel
config. If you use GENERIC kernel, it is there.
And another question is about ports
and if I understood
correct there is also SU journaling file sistem. I will switch to
the GPT partion. If I want to have SU-j file system is it enough
that I just choose this option and voila?
Yes. I think so. 'options UFS_GJOURNAL' is present in GENERIC kernel
config. If you use GENERIC
understood correct
there is also SU journaling file sistem. I will switch to the GPT
partion. If I want to have SU-j file system is it enough that I just
choose this option and voila?
Yes. I think so. 'options UFS_GJOURNAL' is present in GENERIC kernel
config. If you use GENERIC kernel
I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with /proc.
Amanda runs a variation of this command:
# /usr/local/bin/gtar --create --file - --directory / --one-file-system
--sparse --ignore-failed
On Fri, November 18, 2011 10:34 am, Kirk Strauser wrote:
I use Amanda to make nightly backups of a bunch of servers using GNU tar.
However, gtar doesn't seem to respect its --one-file-system flag with
/proc. Amanda runs a variation of this command:
# /usr/local/bin/gtar --create --file
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
/proc is a file on /. /proc/* are files on /proc. The former is still on
the root filesystem (if only as a directory stub to be used as a
mountpoint), so reading it isn't leaving that filesystem. Reading
anything *in* it
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Nov 18 09:36:09 2011
From: Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:34:18 -0600
To: FreeBSD Questions ML freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Shouldn't GNU tar be ignoring /proc with --one-file-system?
I use Amanda to make
On 18/11/2011 17:18, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
/proc is a file on /. /proc/* are files on /proc. The former is still on
the root filesystem (if only as a directory stub to be used as a
mountpoint), so reading it isn't
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
*NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate filesystem. It is merely a
_directory_ with a
.
The 'one-file-system' flags tells gtar not to traverse mount points,
but it will certainly see the mount point and include it in the
archive, along with its modes, flags, atime, mtime, etc. etc. If
those changed between the time if took a peek at the directory and the
time it attempted to include
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Kirk Strauser wrote:
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted filesystems on
your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
*NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate
Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:27 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
See the output of 'mount(8)' for the names of all the mounted
filesystems on your machine.
$ mount | grep proc
procfs on /proc (procfs, local)
*NOTE*WELL* that '/proc' is *not* a separate
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Staal
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 18:00
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't GNU tar be ignoring /proc with --one-file-
system
my syetem is FreeBSD 8.2.
i build a memory disk : mdmfs -s 10G -i 512 -o rw md1 /home/test1
After a period of time，some file in the memory disk lose their inode:
#ls
90020595.o
#ls -l 90020595.o
ls: 90020595.o: No such file or directory
it seem the inode of this file was lost.
how to solve
On 08/07/2011 23:04, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:01:45 +0100
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 08/07/2011 08
On Jul 8, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:12AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
Gary, add
named_flags=-c /etc/namedb/named.conf
to /etc/rc.conf. Or change /etc/namedb/named.conf to the /var
version if you like/there is no symlink.
Dan
Dan! I think
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 07:49:43AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:49:43 -0600
From: Dan Busarow d...@buildingonline.com
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gary Kline kl...@magnesium.net
X
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:14:21AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:14:21 +0100
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 08/07/2011 23:04
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/named.conf: file not
found
Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
The first one that fails is looking for /etc/named.conf. The
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/named.conf: file
not found
Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
The first one that
On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/
named.conf: file not found
Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c /
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:25:34AM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:25:34 -0700
From: Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:01:45 +0100
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 7 July 2011
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:12AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:27:12 -0600
From: Dan Busarow d...@buildingonline.com
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Matthew
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:00:42PM +, Gary Kline wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:00:42 +
From: Gary Kline kl...@magnesium.net
Subject: DNS and file system messed up...
To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Guys,
I'd be much obliged to learn why /etc/rc.named
No problem:
I looked up my solution to the problem because I submitted a patch to fix
things. It's here (ports pr #155788):
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/155788
After this you should be able to create an encrypted filesystem with cmkdir and
attach it with cattach and
(Sorry for the double email, i made a mistake)
I tried again launching nfsd, here is what I did (killing all these process
before) :
rpcbind
nfsd -u -t -n 6
mountd -r
and then : /usr/local/etc/rc.d/cfsd onestart
But i still got the same error :
[tcp] localhost:/usr/local/cfsd-bootstrap: nfsd:
Hello,
In order to test cfs, i tried to set up a ciphered directory.
Unfortunatelly, i failed...
Documentation doesn't seem to be up-to-date, so it does not help much.
Here is what I did :
pkg_add cfs package address
echo /usr/local/cfs-bootstrap localhost /etc/exports
mkdir /crypt
rcpbind -h
Hello,
In order to test cfs, i tried to set up a ciphered directory.
Unfortunatelly, i failed...
Documentation doesn't seem to be up-to-date, so it does not help much.
Here is what I did :
pkg_add cfs package address
echo /usr/local/cfs-bootstrap localhost /etc/exports
mkdir /crypt
rcpbind -h
ALANO CONRAZ wrote:
And I always get the same error :
[tcp] localhost:/usr/local/cfsd-bootstrap: nfsd: RCPROG_NFS: RPC: Remote
system error - Connection refused
and the same with [tcp6]
You need to start nfsd?
- Mark
___
1 - 100 of 822 matches
Mail list logo
