On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 06:50:04PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote:
Woj, I'm really surprised that you, of all people, seem lately to have
been converted to the Micro$oft Outlock-trained style of
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:52:34PM -0500, Doug Lee wrote:
I don't either, but I will provide a different data point: Blind
listers, myself included, must generally read through posts
sequentially, as it is usually trickier to skip reliably through
quotes to the new material when using
From: Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au
[snip]
Woj, I'm really surprised that you, of all people, seem lately to have
been converted to the Micro$oft Outlock-trained style of top-posting,
including tail-quoting all sorts irrelevant and repeated trailers etc,
after years of your (almost
5) The use of HTML mail in a mail forum is absurd; however, it is commonly done
(GMail).
this is a problem - as GMail and similar things itself.
6) One of my 'Pet Peeves: Morons who change a thread's subject rather than
start a new one.
was me sometimes by accident, but i do care now not
On Thursday 19 February 2009 05:06:15 GESBBB wrote:
4) The insertion of legally unenforceable disclaimers, etc. is another big
waste of space.
And not always under the control of sender, through the creative use of
outgoing mailfilters.
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they
I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs
50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2.
Here is one real code with binary output. On 3.0 GHz Woodcrest processor, I
am able to copy from one cache to another cache at the speed of
looks like they improved gcc. you can install older from ports.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs
50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2.
Here is one real code with binary
: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow
looks like they improved gcc. you can install older from ports.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs
50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 03:44 pm, Kailash Kailash wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD
7.0 runs 50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture)
compared to BSD 6.2. Here is one real code with binary output. On
3.0 GHz Woodcrest processor, I am able
...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:46 PM
To: Kailash Kailash
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very slow
looks like they improved gcc. you can install older from ports.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote:
I am using FreeBSD
compatibility
problem?
Thanks,
Kailash
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:46 PM
To: Kailash Kailash
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.O compiled code is very
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Kailash Kailash
kailash.kail...@zscaler.com wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 7.0 in 64 BIT mode. Same code compiled on BSD 7.0 runs
50% speed (as expected by CPU and code architecture) compared to BSD 6.2.
Here is one real code with binary output. On 3.0 GHz Woodcrest
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote:
Woj, I'm really surprised that you, of all people, seem lately to have
been converted to the Micro$oft Outlock-trained style of top-posting,
including tail-quoting all sorts irrelevant and repeated trailers etc,
after years of your (almost too- :)
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Kailash Kailash wrote:
Woj, I'm really surprised that you, of all people, seem lately to have
been converted to the Micro$oft Outlock-trained style of top-posting,
including tail-quoting all sorts irrelevant and
14 matches
Mail list logo
