Before going back to the FHS list, I'd like to summarize what I think the
opinions here were. Please correct me if I'm horribly off-base.
The idea of defining a default directory to hold directories for recurring
temporary mount points is considered to be a good one, though it's use should
be
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:11:28PM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
Before going back to the FHS list, I'd like to summarize what I think the
opinions here were. Please correct me if I'm horribly off-base.
The idea of defining a default directory to hold directories for recurring
temporary
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:11:28PM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
Before going back to the FHS list, I'd like to summarize what I think the
opinions here were. Please correct me if I'm horribly off-base.
The idea of defining a default directory to hold directories for recurring
temporary
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 9:27, Marc Wiz wrote:
May I suggest /tmounts or /tmnts?
I'll add them.
If people are concerned about lots of directories being created in
/'s file system then the top-level directory could itself be a file
system.
The problem was never about size, but about
