On Wednesday 23 July 2008 21:03:36 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gonzalo Nemmi
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 1:02 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD for webserver?
On Wednesday
- Original Message
From: VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeBSD-Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; VeeJay [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:05:26 PM
Subject: FreeBSD for webserver?
Hi there
I am going to make 2 Webserver at my work going to handle 50
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Schmehl
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:22 PM
To: VeeJay; FreeBSD-Questions
Subject: Re: FreeBSD for webserver?
--On Tuesday, July 22, 2008 22:05:26 +0200 VeeJay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 03:47:04 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
This seems to be a common misperception about ports. Ports
aren't something
magical. They do exactly what you would do from the commandline (i.e.
./configure, make, make install), except they come with several bonuses.
1) The
Really good contribution
I would of course go with ports but have a question in mind
What should be installation sequience?
1. Apache 2.2.9
2. MySQL 5.1.26
3. PHP 5.2.6
And are there any options you guys would like to suggest to avoide for
performance or security reasons?
Regards
VJ
At least ports-mgmt/portaudit, which check if installed ports have
published security vulnerabilities.
I don't use PHP, but I used to create a separate user for each webapp
with a special login class, so I would run PHP in FCGI mode (with
something like xcache) instead of mod_php.
For the rest
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:47:04PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Another problem with ports is that all of them like pulling the
original source from the author's site. I've had a few where the
author released the code under GPL then a few years later lost
interest, stopped paying whatever
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:01:44PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Some people enjoy doing that. Most people just want the software to work,
be easy to maintain and upgrade and then stay out of their way.
Ahem, and that 'just works' crowd is
cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ports would still go to the primary sites (to conserve bandwidth),
but should the original distfile disappear, it would be still available
on freebsd.
I think his problem comes from the fact that some ports don't do this, not
that it isn't a good idea. The
Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:01:44PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Some people enjoy doing that. Most people just want the software to work,
be easy to maintain and upgrade and then stay out of their way.
Ahem, and that 'just
--On Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:06:30 +0200 VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really good contribution
I would of course go with ports but have a question in mind
What should be installation sequience?
1. Apache 2.2.9
2. MySQL 5.1.26
3. PHP 5.2.6
Install Apache before you install
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gonzalo Nemmi
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 1:02 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD for webserver?
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 03:47:04 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
This seems
Hi there
I am going to make 2 Webserver at my work going to handle 50 mil hits per
month... They are using Linux already. But being a FreeBSD fan, I have
proposed FreeBSD to my Boss convincing him that FreeBSD is more Fast and
Secure solution for his needs... And now I want to show the results...
VeeJay wrote:
Hi there
I am going to make 2 Webserver at my work going to handle 50 mil hits per
month... They are using Linux already. But being a FreeBSD fan, I have
proposed FreeBSD to my Boss convincing him that FreeBSD is more Fast and
Secure solution for his needs... And now I want to
Chris St Denis wrote:
VeeJay wrote:
Hi there
I am going to make 2 Webserver at my work going to handle 50 mil hits per
month... They are using Linux already. But being a FreeBSD fan, I have
proposed FreeBSD to my Boss convincing him that FreeBSD is more Fast and
Secure solution for his
--On Tuesday, July 22, 2008 22:05:26 +0200 VeeJay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there
I am going to make 2 Webserver at my work going to handle 50 mil hits per
month... They are using Linux already. But being a FreeBSD fan, I have
proposed FreeBSD to my Boss convincing him that FreeBSD is more
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Some people enjoy doing that. Most people just want the software to work,
be easy to maintain and upgrade and then stay out of their way.
Ahem, and that 'just works' crowd is generally not found using FreeBSD or in
an admin capacity. :-)
--
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Some people enjoy doing that. Most people just want the software to work,
be easy to maintain and upgrade and then stay out of their way.
Ahem, and that 'just works' crowd is generally not found using FreeBSD or in
an admin
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:01:44 -0400
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Some people enjoy doing that. Most people just want the software to work,
be easy to maintain and upgrade and then stay out of their way.
Ahem, and that 'just
--On July 22, 2008 9:01:44 PM -0400 Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Some people enjoy doing that. Most people just want the software to
work, be easy to maintain and upgrade and then stay out of their way.
Ahem, and that 'just works'
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Compiling from source rather than ports gains you nothing, in most cases,
and can cost you a great deal of extra time if you run into problems. Time
is something most admins I know have precious little of already.
Relax. Google joke and
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This seems to be a common misperception about ports. Ports aren't
something magical. They do exactly what you would do from the
commandline (i.e. ./configure, make, make install), except they come
with several bonuses.
1) The port maintainer has
22 matches
Mail list logo
