On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 01:58:57PM -0400, Chuck Robey typed:
Lars Eighner wrote:
I have some sources which may or may not exist. My target should be
rebuilt
if a source exists that is younger than the target. But sources that do
not exist should be ignored and make should not be
Le 8 juin 09 à 23:20, Polytropon a écrit :
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:12:17 +0200, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:52:17PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
What I need most is to find (a) make tutorial(s) that do not
suppose make is
being used for compling c/c++
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 04:18:10 Grünewald Michaël wrote:
Le 8 juin 09 à 23:20, Polytropon a écrit :
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:12:17 +0200, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:52:17PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
What I need most is to find (a) make tutorial(s)
Correct. I do the same here.
I also do use make to produce LaTeX documents. I even `published' my
collection of makefiles at https://gna.org/projects/bsdmakepscripts/
make is universal too, as many other unix tools. for example i use make
and cpp (C preprocessor) for making HTML pages :)
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar said:
Correct. I do the same here.
I also do use make to produce LaTeX documents. I even `published' my
collection of makefiles at https://gna.org/projects/bsdmakepscripts/
make is universal too, as many other unix tools. for
Lars Eighner wrote:
What I need most is to find (a) make tutorial(s) that do not suppose
make is
being used for compling c/c++ programs. Yes, I know, that is mostly why
make exists, but many tutorials plunge right into C examples with
implicit C
rules, while -- it seems to me -- make
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:52:17PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
What I need most is to find (a) make tutorial(s) that do not suppose make is
being used for compling c/c++ programs. Yes, I know, that is mostly why
make exists, but many tutorials plunge right into C examples with implicit C
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:12:17 +0200, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:52:17PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:
What I need most is to find (a) make tutorial(s) that do not suppose make is
being used for compling c/c++ programs. Yes, I know, that is mostly why
make
What I need most is to find (a) make tutorial(s) that do not suppose make is
being used for compling c/c++ programs. Yes, I know, that is mostly why
make exists, but many tutorials plunge right into C examples with implicit C
rules, while -- it seems to me -- make could be much more useful for