Can you please file a PR with your findings? That's definitely something
we need fixed as mtree is pretty important to the project.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
One last comment, for the records,
Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the
same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just
confirming permissions and ownership on all files.
I also just thought of an idea I need to benchmark: running mtree
Hello,
On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and
all users come with GID lower that 100.
I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accounts are over 20
years old!
This is not too much a problem with FreeBSD as I can renumber the few
FreeBSD services that
, then vi /etc/groups), and then re-apply
the mtree to the entire filesystem. It should find all the files that
are now orphaned and fix them to use the new UID/GID that you specified.
:)
What pitfall should I avoid?
Not having a backup :)
___
freebsd
to renumber users, but I've noticed tar will restore a backup
across hosts and try to resolve user names correctly. tar stores users
and groups symbolically and will happily extract them to the correct
numerical ID on the new host. All you need do, therefore, is merge the
passwd and group files without
,
Olivier
Both tar and rsync are spectacularly clever about this. I've never
needed to renumber users, but I've noticed tar will restore a backup
across hosts and try to resolve user names correctly. tar stores users
and groups symbolically and will happily extract them to the correct
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 11:36, Mark Felder wrote:
Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the
same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just
confirming permissions and ownership on all files.
I also just thought of an idea I need to
Thank you,
Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the
same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just
confirming permissions and ownership on all files.
I also just thought of an idea I need to benchmark: running mtree with
and without nscd.
http://code.google.com/p/powerpc-bits-and-pieces/downloads/list
The number of packages are limited; but, there is enough of a base to setup X,
have a browser, a window manager and a few others. PowerPC only.
You'll have to download such as:
ftp
Hi FreeBSD Folks,
I'm using Samba 3.5.6 to authenticate logins and manage access on FreeBSD 8.1.
With Sudo 1.7.2, I was able to use Active Directory groups in sudoers(5), but
this doesn't seem to work in 1.7.4.
Versions:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD cis-mvl.ml.unisa.edu.au 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1
Just spent some time figuring this out.
I needed to create a group and add myself to it.
But after I added myself to the group while I could id username my
username and
get the correct groups if I did a base id or groups the new group
wouldn't
show up. Not could I access a directory
On 26/12/2010 17:50, Chris Telting wrote:
Just spent some time figuring this out.
I needed to create a group and add myself to it.
But after I added myself to the group while I could id username my
username and
get the correct groups if I did a base id or groups the new group
wouldn't
Could someone point me in the direction of enlightenment with regard
to the value add of the group per user approach that adduser
uses? Is that a FreeBSD thing, or a *BSD thing, or a unix-like-universe
thing, or what?
Thanks!
--
John Lind
j...@starfire.mn.org
when read/write access to files and directories is
determined. This, of course, can be overridden with the '-g' flag,
changing the default group, and additionally with '-G' to add to several
groups.
Regards,
--
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions
On 27/01/10 19.05, John wrote:
Could someone point me in the direction of enlightenment with regard
to the value add of the group per user approach that adduser
uses? Is that a FreeBSD thing, or a *BSD thing, or a unix-like-universe
thing, or what?
Many systems do this AFAIK.
IIRC, the point
John j...@starfire.mn.org writes:
Could someone point me in the direction of enlightenment with regard
to the value add of the group per user approach that adduser
uses?
man adduser; about 60 lines in, there is a whole section titled
UNIQUE GROUPS. This is the document you want.
--
Lowell
/mailing.freebsd.questions/topics?lnk
Wojciech Puchar schrieb am 2009-06-14:
i've been using the mailman interface for a long time now to read
the various
freebsd mailinglists. recently i found out about Google groups
which are great
isn't standard interface the simplest? you get it on your mailbox,
and you use
i've been using the mailman interface for a long time now to read the various
freebsd mailinglists. recently i found out about Google groups which are great
isn't standard interface the simplest? you get it on your mailbox, and you
use .procmailrc to put it into separate folder each mailing
hi there,
i've been using the mailman interface for a long time now to read the various
freebsd mailinglists. recently i found out about Google groups which are great
and a lot better than the mailman interface imo. (no broken search, etc.)
however a lot of mailinglists seem to be missing
Monday 04 May 2009 16:24:33 Shaun Friedle napisał(a):
Hi,
I seem to have a weird problem with groups, it seems like the system
doesn't notice that I am in certain groups when it comes to file
permissions, and if I run groups or id with no arguments it also has
some groups missing from
with groups, it seems like the system
doesn't notice that I am in certain groups when it comes to file
permissions, and if I run groups or id with no arguments it also has
some groups missing from the list, but with my username as an argument
it is complete. I've never encountered this before
Hi,
I seem to have a weird problem with groups, it seems like the system
doesn't notice that I am in certain groups when it comes to file
permissions, and if I run groups or id with no arguments it also has
some groups missing from the list, but with my username as an argument
it is complete
in this case, and need to enable
regular user access to audio, cdrom/dvd read and write, usb access, and
network reconfiguration/dialout, games and so forth.
I am not seeing such things as plugdev,audio,cdrom in etc/group after
initial install.
Do I need to manually add such groups and then point
reconfiguration/dialout, games and so forth.
I am not seeing such things as plugdev,audio,cdrom in etc/group after
initial install.
Do I need to manually add such groups and then point relevant packages
to them?
Various methods apply (for instance /dev/dspN.n is world
writable), man 5 devfs.conf
intend to use the system on a laptop in this case, [...]
Typical single user setting.
[...] and need to enable
regular user access to audio, cdrom/dvd read and write, usb access, and
network reconfiguration/dialout, games and so forth.
There are several groups that you can add your user
* ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com [2009-05-04 14:39:34 -0400]:
Various methods apply (for instance /dev/dspN.n is world
writable), man 5 devfs.conf is a good start for some of that.
Ah. Thanks.
--
Cheers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Polytropon free...@edvax.de [2009-05-04 21:02:29 +0200]:
[...] and of
course 'wheel'.
Why of course? :-)
Umm, linuxism habit :-)
There are several groups that you can add your user to, but because
you're already in wheel, you don't have to (such as the dialer
group for ppp
FreeBSD adduser creates by default users with GID equal to UID. There is
a very short notice in the man page ('UNIQUE GROUPS') from Rod Grimes.
Where can a more elaborate argumentation be found on the net?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On 01/20/2009 08:23 PM, Tim Judd wrote:
[...]
and I recommend against sudo because it's very design is a
man-in-the-middle type of scenario, and one typo by the sudo devs can
possibly make a mess out of things.
I think sudo makes a lazy admin -- too easy to just run in and hit
something.
as su.
...
I think sudo is a false sense of security. If a user trusts another,
and give sudo access, why not give the whole OS to them?
Among other reasons, because it allows you to partition privileges
and give access for specific users (or groups of users) to specific
accounts only
sorry OT
and I recommend against sudo because it's very design is a man-in-the-middle
type of scenario, and one typo by the sudo devs can possibly make a mess out
of things.
I think sudo makes a lazy admin -- too easy to just run in and hit
something.
I think sudo is a false sense of
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE and I have multiple user accounts set up.
I made about 4 for myself to use and do various testing with, and made
some for my Wife as well because She knows UNIX better than I do anyway heh.
Anyway, one of the things I forgot about, was that FreeBSD by
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:09:16PM -0500, Akenner wrote:
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE and I have multiple user accounts set up.
I made about 4 for myself to use and do various testing with, and made
some for my Wife as well because She knows UNIX better than I do anyway heh.
Akenner wrote:
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE and I have multiple user accounts set up.
I made about 4 for myself to use and do various testing with, and made
some for my Wife as well because She knows UNIX better than I do anyway
heh.
Anyway, one of the things I forgot about, was
In response to Akenner slackwarew...@comcast.net:
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE and I have multiple user accounts set up.
I made about 4 for myself to use and do various testing with, and made
some for my Wife as well because She knows UNIX better than I do anyway heh.
Anyway, one
Thanks everyone for the replies, much appreciated.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:09:16PM -0500, Akenner wrote:
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE and I have multiple user accounts set up.
I made about 4 for myself to use and do various testing with, and made
some for my Wife as well because She knows UNIX better than I do anyway heh.
Clifton Royston wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:09:16PM -0500, Akenner wrote:
Hi,
I'm using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE and I have multiple user accounts set up.
I made about 4 for myself to use and do various testing with, and made
some for my Wife as well because She knows UNIX better than I
Companies need your input in order to be successful. They need to know
what everyday people want in their products, what they prefer, and
what will prompt them to buy the products and services the company
offers. This is called market research. By providing companies with
this information, you
On 22 Aug 2008 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] entreated
about
freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 229, Issue 13:
Hi,
Yesterday night at 1 a.m. I have managed to remove /etc/groups (rm instead of
vi, was already sleepying). Luckily only a few groups (2-3) was created
earlier. No backup, of course.
you
Just an addition:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:14:39 +0200, DA Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you want to do
man rcs
and start using RCS to track changes to your important system files.
That way, if you delete one you can just check it out of the RCS
store. 'backups with history'
You can use
Hi,
Yesterday night at 1 a.m. I have managed to remove /etc/groups (rm instead of
vi, was already sleepying). Luckily only a few groups (2-3) was created
earlier. No backup, of course.
I believe the file system is still correct, it uses group IDs instead of names
(?). Though ls does not show
On Aug 21, 2008, at 9:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any better way of rebuilding /etc/groups than guessing and
manually adding one-by-one.
Can I somehow list all group IDs used by the file system?
You should start with /usr/src/etc/group, which is the original
version
I would start by comparing the contents of /usr/ports/GIDs with the ports
you have installed (as listed in /var/db/pkg). You can get a stock group
file from src/etc/group. Reinstalling ports will recreate the groups they
use (though you could do most of it manually), and you may be on your own
John Nielsen wrote:
I would start by comparing the contents of /usr/ports/GIDs with the ports
you have installed (as listed in /var/db/pkg). You can get a stock group
file from src/etc/group. Reinstalling ports will recreate the groups they
use (though you could do most of it manually
On 21 aug 2008, at 18:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday night at 1 a.m. I have managed to remove /etc/groups (rm
instead of vi, was already sleepying). Luckily only a few groups
(2-3) was created earlier. No backup, of course.
I believe the file system is still correct
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday night at 1 a.m. I have managed to remove /etc/groups (rm
instead of vi, was already sleepying). Luckily only a few groups
(2-3) was created earlier. No backup, of course.
Yes, there is a backup. Restore from /var/backups/group.bak.
Best regards
Oliver
Great help from all of you! Thank you, Balazs
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:43:06 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /etc/groups gone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yesterday night at 1 a.m. I
is there a way of modifing etcgroup to let me edit files
chown'd www:kline as kline? after all, i am in the wheel
and operator group.
gary
ps: thing i never learned in kindergarten:-)
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thought.org Public
On Jul 21, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
is there a way of modifing etcgroup to let me edit files
chown'd www:kline as kline? after all, i am in the wheel
and operator group.
Presuming you are in the kline group also, and that the files are
group-writable, you
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:08:15AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 21, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Gary Kline wrote:
is there a way of modifing etcgroup to let me edit files
chown'd www:kline as kline? after all, i am in the wheel
and operator group.
Presuming you are in the kline
What are the permissions on the files you're trying to edit? 664 would
allow owner/group editing, but readonly by world. If it's 644, then only
owner can edit, but group/world can read.
At 04:05 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:08:15AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 21,
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:00:24 -0400
Jon Radel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other things being equal, it's better
to have all users use their own login group and then add them to
additional groups as appropriate.
jon,
i have always been curious about this. why is it better for a user to
be in his
prad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:00:24 -0400
Jon Radel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other things being equal, it's better
to have all users use their own login group and then add them to
additional groups as appropriate.
jon,
i have always been curious about this. why
Hello,
Can you help me on this...
I have a directory in the server this is what is looks like
drwxrwx--- 12 root plusmate 512 April 13 14:46 plusmate shared
...this directory is shared in my network, and i dont recieve any complain
in any user which can acces to that folder/directory
*My
At 05:19 AM 4/17/2008, Ruel Luchavez wrote:
Hello,
Can you help me on this...
I have a directory in the server this is what is looks like
drwxrwx--- 12 root plusmate 512 April 13 14:46 plusmate shared
...this directory is shared in my network, and i dont recieve any complain
in any user
plusmater ac06
would give more elegant results. Other things being equal, it's better
to have all users use their own login group and then add them to
additional groups as appropriate. There are plenty of legitimate
reasons not to do this, so you're probably best off remaining consistent
with the setup
hey, the username to windows and in my freebsd server is just the same.. I
allready change it many times but still the problem still not solve
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Derek Ragona
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:19 AM 4/17/2008, Ruel Luchavez wrote:
Hello,
Can you help me on
their own login group and then add them to
additional groups as appropriate. There are plenty of legitimate
reasons not to do this, so you're probably best off remaining consistent
with the setup of the existing users.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Ruel Luchavez wrote:
Hello,
Can you help me on this...
I have a directory in the server this is what is looks like
drwxrwx--- 12 root plusmate 512 April 13 14:46 plusmate shared
...this directory is shared in my network, and i dont recieve any complain
in any user which can acces to that
of groups a user can join
On Jan 15, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
I made some tries removing him from other groups and I got to
the conclusion that it works as long as he is in no more than
15 groups, but breaks when he join the 16th. Is this an hard
limit? Can it be extended
other groups and I got to the
conclusion that it works as long as he is in no more than 15 groups, but
breaks when he join the 16th.
Is this an hard limit? Can it be extended? Why this?
bye Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Jan 15, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
I made some tries removing him from other groups and I got to the
conclusion that it works as long as he is in no more than 15 groups,
but breaks when he join the 16th. Is this an hard limit? Can it be
extended? Why this?
This limit
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:28:17PM +, Andrew Stevens wrote:
Hi everybody
Freebsd 6.2
sorry this question is a bit thick I know but after getting the usb and cdrom
open as root I tried as user and got the following message
A security policy in place prevents this sender from
Hi everybody
Freebsd 6.2
sorry this question is a bit thick I know but after getting the usb and cdrom
open as root I tried as user and got the following message
A security policy in place prevents this sender from sending this
message to this recipient, see message bus configuration file
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:28:17PM +, Andrew Stevens wrote:
Hi everybody
Freebsd 6.2
sorry this question is a bit thick I know but after getting the usb and cdrom
open as root I tried as user and got the following message
A security policy in place prevents this sender from
Hello, I wish to use hal to mount my dvd roms and usb mass storages,
but I can't find the right groups for my user, so I can use as a
normal user, anyone who can help me?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 06:08:08PM +0200, Roberth Sjonøy wrote:
Hello, I wish to use hal to mount my dvd roms and usb mass storages,
but I can't find the right groups for my user, so I can use as a
normal user, anyone who can help me?
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html#q19
Yuri
Hi all,
I have FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25 authenticating successfully against
active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via
FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to
set group permissions using the syntax of
the aforementioned
[http://www.techtutorials.net/blogs/index.php?mode=viewuseruser_id=7].
Does anyone know ?
As far as i know and the way i do it is leaving the Domain part out just the
group name.
Wbinfo -g shows the groups if all is ok.
Regards,
Johan
No virus found in this outgoing message
(if there are better alternatives). Also, I'd like to be able to
(safely!) automatically synchronise users and groups that I may
add/change/delete on the live server.
Regarding the data, the machine is mainly used as a webserver, running
PHP, MySQL and some other things. For me, it is totally fine
for you depends much on how you access your data. Is it
read-only or read/write?
Also, I'd like to be able to
(safely!) automatically synchronise users and groups that I may
add/change/delete on the live server.
I'm using OpenLDAP and nss_ldap for that. Works very well
Hi.
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 24), Roberto Nunnari said:
Hi everybody.
Could anybody tell me the reason why by default FreeBSD
limits the number of groups a user can be member of to 16?
Compatibility with the NFS protocol. A google search on nfs 16
groups returned a lot
Sorry.. In my previous mail, I forgot to say to send
replies to my mailbox as well, as I'm not on the list.
Thank you.
Hi.
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 24), Roberto Nunnari said:
Hi everybody.
Could anybody tell me the reason why by default FreeBSD
limits the number of groups
Hi everybody.
Could anybody tell me the reason why by default FreeBSD
limits the number of groups a user can be member of to 16?
Not all servers have 5000k users and today memory is not an
issue. Indeed, some servers used just for services have
no users apart a few staff users and users to run
In the last episode (Jul 24), Roberto Nunnari said:
Hi everybody.
Could anybody tell me the reason why by default FreeBSD
limits the number of groups a user can be member of to 16?
Compatibility with the NFS protocol. A google search on nfs 16
groups returned a lot of hits.
http
the reason why by default FreeBSD
limits the number of groups a user can be member of to 16?
Compatibility with the NFS protocol. A google search on nfs 16
groups returned a lot of hits.
http://www.sunmanagers.org/archives/1998/1328.html
http://nfsworld.blogspot.com/2005/03/whats-deal-on-16-group-id
In the last episode (Jul 24), Roberto Nunnari said:
Thank you Dan.
I'll set up a test machine and try a kernel with the limit
set to 256.
Do you know if that change requires a build world or
a buildkernel is enough?
libc uses NGROUPS_MAX and NGROUPS, so a buildworld is recommended.
--
Hi,
I saw a reference to kern.ngroups on this list and didn't know what it
meant.
I decided to peek at the source and it seems to me that it is the
number of process groups. Is that correct?
Thanks in advance,
Duane Whitty
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Duane Whitty wrote:
I saw a reference to kern.ngroups on this list and didn't know what it
meant.
I decided to peek at the source and it seems to me that it is the
number of process groups. Is that correct?
No, kern.ngroups is the maximum number of groups to which a user can
belong
Colin Percival wrote:
Duane Whitty wrote:
I saw a reference to kern.ngroups on this list and didn't know what it
meant.
I decided to peek at the source and it seems to me that it is the
number of process groups. Is that correct?
No, kern.ngroups is the maximum number of groups
I recently tried using the newgrp command (just for kicks) and it
aborted killing the window in which I invoked it. I couldn't find a man page
for newgrp (though I did find it in O'Reilly's UNIX in a Nutshell). This
has led me to question how groups are used in UNIX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently tried using the newgrp command (just for kicks) and it aborted
killing the window in which I invoked it. I couldn't find a man page for newgrp
(though I did find it in O'Reilly's UNIX in a Nutshell). This has led me to
question how groups
U I have a bad habit of not merging the /etc/group file. Can someone
send me over the line from your FBSD 6.0 install, for the new audit group?
Thanks,
--
Wil Hatfield
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Nevermind I got it.
audit:*:77:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wil Hatfield
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:08 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Merging Groups
U I have a bad habit of not merging the /etc/group file
Is there anyone using FreeBSD in Perth, WA, Australia?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bruce,
Have you checked http://www.freebsd.org/usergroups.html#australia yet?
-David
On 3/8/06, Bruce M. Axtens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone using FreeBSD in Perth, WA, Australia?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
:*:1002:1002::0:0:Hednod:/home/nomad:/usr/local/bin/zsh
polvott:*:1003:1003::0:0:Thomas:/home/polvott:/usr/local/bin/zsh
speak:*:1004:1004::0:0:Poetry:/home/speak:/usr/local/bin/zsh
And groups equally:
nobody:*:5:
wheel:*:0:root
daemon:*:1:
operator:*:2:root
kmem:*:3:
bin:*:4:
tty:*:5:
news
:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
vaaf:*:1001:0::0:0:Kristian:/home/vaaf:/usr/local/bin/zsh
nomad:*:1002:1002::0:0:Hednod:/home/nomad:/usr/local/bin/zsh
polvott:*:1003:1003::0:0:Thomas:/home/polvott:/usr/local/bin/zsh
speak:*:1004:1004::0:0:Poetry:/home/speak:/usr/local/bin/zsh
And groups equally
Kristian Vaaf wrote:
[ ... ]
Have you all ever had a look at your /etc/master.passwd and /etc/group?
Yes. Most people who edit these files by hand try to keep them in order, but...
Stupid question. But notice the user and group identifications being thrown
about as if they didn't matter.
FreeBSD 6 RELEASE onto a hard drive and added two
other
users, bob and bill.
Whilst I was doing this I decided to make root and bob members of ALL the
groups in the system.
I now find that I am unable to log in as either root or bob nor can I su
from bob.
I have tried booting to safe mode
a hard drive and added two other
users, bob and bill.
Whilst I was doing this I decided to make root and bob members of ALL the
groups in the system.
I now find that I am unable to log in as either root or bob nor can I su
from bob.
I have tried booting to safe mode but it will still not allow me
a hard drive and added two
other
users, bob and bill.
Whilst I was doing this I decided to make root and bob members of ALL the
groups in the system.
I now find that I am unable to log in as either root or bob nor can I su
from bob.
I have tried booting to safe mode but it will still
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 09:26:36AM +1030, Ian Moore wrote:
So it actually does work! And there's no need to adjust or re-compile any
ports, just world and kernel?
World, kernel, static linked ports and all ports which use NGROUPS_MAX
constant for space allocation. Samba worked fine for me
On Thursday 08 December 2005 19:00, Igor Robul wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:48:04PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 12/7/05, Ian Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm toying with the idea of increasing the maximum number of groups a
user can belong to on one of my servers
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:48:04PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 12/7/05, Ian Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm toying with the idea of increasing the maximum number of groups a user
can
belong to on one of my servers - we have a rather complex organisation and
we're
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi,
I'm toying with the idea of increasing the maximum number of groups a user
can
belong to on one of my servers - we have a rather complex organisation and
we're hitting the 15 group limit for some people.
There seems to be differing opinions
On 12/7/05, Ian Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm toying with the idea of increasing the maximum number of groups a user can
belong to on one of my servers - we have a rather complex organisation and
we're hitting the 15 group limit for some people.
Have you considered cascading groups
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:41, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi,
I'm toying with the idea of increasing the maximum number of groups a user
can belong to on one of my servers - we have a rather complex organisation
and we're hitting the 15 group limit for some people.
There seems to be differing
Hi,
I'm toying with the idea of increasing the maximum number of groups a user can
belong to on one of my servers - we have a rather complex organisation and
we're hitting the 15 group limit for some people.
There seems to be differing opinions on how to do this and if it's actually
feasible
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
