Re: qjail fork attribution was Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available for critique (fwd)

2013-04-02 Thread Ian Smith
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:00:44 -0400, Stephen Cook wrote: On 4/1/2013 5:23 AM, Ian Smith wrote: Actually, I forwarded a message that Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com posted to -jail and -ports. Proper attribution is what this issue's all about. It's been pointed out to me privately that cross-posting

Re: qjail fork attribution was Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available for critique (fwd)

2013-04-01 Thread Ian Smith
Posted so people following -questions can gather what Joe Barbish is fishing for in the present thread regarding copyright and licensing. cheers, Ian -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:26:16 -0400 From: Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com To: Dirk Engling

Re: qjail fork attribution was Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available for critique (fwd)

2013-04-01 Thread Stephen Cook
On 4/1/2013 5:23 AM, Ian Smith wrote: One does not have to be a lawyer to know the lack of any license verbiage embedded in computer programs released to the public becomes property of public domain forever. Putting license verbiage on your next port version is unenforceable because it's already

Re: Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available for critique (fwd)

2013-03-22 Thread Ian Smith
Joe, your mailer dropped -questions from the ccs on your response. Fixed, Ian -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:12:18 -0400 From: Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com To: freebsd-j...@freebsd.org Cc: Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au, Dirk Engling erdge...@erdgeist.org