Alejandro Imass wrote:
[snip]
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before.
Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be cracked or or you
Arthur Chance wrote:
[snip]
What I was pondering is some form of L2TP tunnel, or some other form of
IPSEC tunnel to form some kind of VPN like communication between the
client and the wifi. Just never have begun to find the time to get
anywhere with the idea. But basically it would resemble a
Michael Powell wrote:
[snip]
Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be cracked or or you simply
referring to weak keys?
I would also like to specifically if it's for weak keys or are all
WPA2 personal keys crackable by brute force. Also is WPA2 Enterprise
as weak also. Could anyone expand
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[snip]
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:16:32 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[snip]
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many
think it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true;
it just takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3
hours
Hi--
On Apr 24, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
This is along the lines of what I was thinking. I am my own CA and can
generate certs that no one else has the private keys to.
So can someone who does not run their own CA...?
The problem with buying certs from
On 04/22/13 21:49, Michael Powell wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[...]
Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of
protection that is truly necessary in this modern day.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:04 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:30 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
takes longer. I've done
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
Not sure what you mean by 'cracked' here. If you are
Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
Not sure what you mean by
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of protection
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[...]
Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of protection
that is truly necessary in this modern day. You can keep out script
kiddies and people who don't have skill, but people who know what they
are doing are only slowed down.
Thanks for
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[...]
Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of protection
that is truly necessary in this modern day. You can keep out script
kiddies and people who don't have skill,
Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[...]
Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of
protection that is truly necessary in this modern day. You can keep out
script kiddies and
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:30 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before.
Are you saying that any WPA2
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
I would like something that is plug and play and easy to use in the
$300 rage tops that has the WiFi router integrated. It seems only
Hacom offers this.
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
Not sure what you mean by 'cracked' here. If you are meaning that someone is
using aircrack-ng to break your Wifi authentication
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
I would like something that is plug and play and easy to use in the
$300 rage tops that has the WiFi router integrated. It seems only
Hacom offers this. Can
Hi Alejandro. I can't speak about Hacom, but I've had excellent
results with Soekris hardware. It'll run all sorts of FreeBSD-based
systems. They have kit suitable for both wired and wireless networks.
--
James.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
19 matches
Mail list logo
