Re: IPFW transparent VS dummynet rules

2012-01-08 Thread budsz
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote: On Sat, 7 Jan 2012, budsz wrote: [..]               keyword instead of an explicit address.  The search terminates if               this rule matches.     Note particularly the last sentence.  You'll have to do your

IPFW transparent VS dummynet rules

2012-01-07 Thread budsz
Hi folks, I already found the mistake of my ruleset sequence on my box, for ex: ${fwcmd} add 30 fwd ${ipproxy},${portproxy} tcp from ${ipclproxy} to any dst-port ${porthttp} in via ${ifint0} ${fwcmd} add 52 pipe 2 ip from any to ${ipclient} via ${ifint0} ${fwcmd} add 53 pipe 3 ip from

Re: IPFW transparent VS dummynet rules

2012-01-07 Thread Ian Smith
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012, budsz wrote: Hi folks, I already found the mistake of my ruleset sequence on my box, for ex: ${fwcmd} add 30 fwd ${ipproxy},${portproxy} tcp from ${ipclproxy} to any dst-port ${porthttp} in via ${ifint0} ${fwcmd} add 52 pipe 2 ip from any to ${ipclient} via