On Fri, 01 Mar 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-27 11:19, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-26 15:18, Teske, Devin skrev:
Yes, this is possible.
When I get into work, I'll share with you the recipe
Please do share with us.
Ok I rephrase my question. How do I install
2013-02-26 15:18, Teske, Devin skrev:
Yes, this is possible.
When I get into work, I'll share with you the recipe
Please do share with us.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
\
/usr/lib/libnetgraph.so.4 \
; do
cp -pfv $file $dir$file
done
-Original Message-
From: Bernt Hansson [mailto:b...@bananmonarki.se]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 2:19 AM
To: Teske, Devin
Cc: questions FreeBSD
Subject: Re: Jail question
2013-02-26 15:18
...@freebsd.org]
on behalf of Bernt Hansson [b...@bananmonarki.se]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 5:23 AM
To: questions FreeBSD
Subject: Jail question
Hello list!
I would like to install an old version of freebsd let's say 4.6 in a
jail. Is that possible.
Host is 8.3-stable amd64
Bernt Hansson wrote:
I would like to install an old version of freebsd let's say 4.6 in a
jail. Is that possible.
Host is 8.3-stable amd64
Things like ps won't run, but you can copy static binaries from host:/rescue to
jail:/{bin,sbin} as appropriate and that helps a lot.
I just installed a
Hi..
I've actualy got a messing about PC with 8.1 on, that I often play with
during lunch times at work. Trouble is, been working through lunchtimes
for the last week or three.
Self teaching is good, you certainly learn things, but though I'm not in
need of instant self gratification, it's a
On 12/18/10 02:58, Dave wrote:
Hi..
I've actualy got a messing about PC with 8.1 on, that I often play with
during lunch times at work. Trouble is, been working through lunchtimes
for the last week or three.
Self teaching is good, you certainly learn things, but though I'm not in
need of
Dave d...@g8kbv.demon.co.uk writes:
I've been reading the FreeBSD Manual (a dangerous thing to do during
lunchtimes!) relating to Jails. Other than making my head spin, I'm
finding it a tad dificult finding out just what you can/cant do with a
Jail. Mainly, because I'm not familiar with
On 16 Dec 2010 at 14:50, Da Rock wrote:
On 12/16/10 09:32, Dave wrote:
Hi.
As some of you may remember, I've managed to build a F'BSD V8.0
based system that provides me with:-
.
.
.
.
Hi..
Indexer and Da Rock, many thanks, more reading, and some fiddling needed
I think.
Cheers.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Indexer and Da Rock, many thanks, more reading, and some fiddling needed
I think.
It is the best way to learn. Setup a VM of fbsd 8.1 on your computer, and just
play with it on that with jails, and learn what you can an cant do. Remember
Hi.
As some of you may remember, I've managed to build a F'BSD V8.0 based
system that provides me with:-
Local GPS disiplined NTP server (working very well) the reason I built
the thing in the first place, but it seems FreeBSD can do so much more,
so I also have.
Hiawatha webserver (also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SSH remote login for admin needs (But not for root login) Also working
well.
Good!
I think I'd like to run Hiawatha in a Jail, as it seems the right thing
to do with something that will be exposed to the www.
(Comments/advice?)
- From
On 12/16/10 09:32, Dave wrote:
Hi.
As some of you may remember, I've managed to build a F'BSD V8.0 based
system that provides me with:-
Local GPS disiplined NTP server (working very well) the reason I built
the thing in the first place, but it seems FreeBSD can do so much more,
so I also
On 10/14/10 18:20, Matthew Law wrote:
I have a single box on which I would like to run openvpn, smtp (postfix,
dspam, greylist, clamav), imap (dovecot) apache22 and bind. This box also
acts as a network gateway so it would give an attacker carte blanche to
the internal nets if it was
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com articulated:
Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports
collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their task
of
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:17 -0400
bdsf...@att.net bdsf...@att.net articulated:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry
freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com articulated:
Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition
On Fri, October 15, 2010 2:54 pm, Ivan Voras wrote:
Since jails can do many things there are many helper utilities that
can do much to simplify the process. If you can hack python, you can,
for example, modify my script at
http://ivoras.sharanet.org/stuff/mkjails.py which I've used to create
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 333, Issue 2, Message: 1
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:17 -0400 bdsf...@att.net wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net
wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com articulated:
Check out
Matthew Law wrote:
I have a single box on which I would like to run openvpn, smtp (postfix,
dspam, greylist, clamav), imap (dovecot) apache22 and bind. This box also
acts as a network gateway so it would give an attacker carte blanche to
the internal nets if it was compromised, which makes me
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com articulated:
Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports
collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their task
of adding new ports to the system. So in the mean time you can get
qjail from
I have a single box on which I would like to run openvpn, smtp (postfix,
dspam, greylist, clamav), imap (dovecot) apache22 and bind. This box also
acts as a network gateway so it would give an attacker carte blanche to
the internal nets if it was compromised, which makes me nervous. The plan
is
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Matthew Law wrote:
I have a single box on which I would like to run openvpn, smtp (postfix,
dspam, greylist, clamav), imap (dovecot) apache22 and bind. This box also
acts as a network gateway so it would give an attacker carte blanche to
the internal nets if it was
On 14 October 2010 19:19, doug d...@fledge.watson.org wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Matthew Law wrote:
I have a single box on which I would like to run openvpn, smtp (postfix,
dspam, greylist, clamav), imap (dovecot) apache22 and bind. This box also
acts as a network gateway so it would give
I have: (Samba+LDAP = PDC + Dovecot+Postix ) ---JailA
(amavisd-new+spamassassin+clamd --spam gateway ) ---JailB
FreeBSD 8.0 Release.
My src.conf for my jails:
WITHOUT_AMD=yes
WITHOUT_APM=yes
WITHOUT_ASSERT_DEBUG=yes
WITHOUT_ATM=yes
WITHOUT_AUTHPF=yes
WITHOUT_BIND=yes
Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Jim stapleton...@gmail.com wrote:
First, Thanks all for the help with my previous sendmail question.
I rebuilt the jail without postfix and that at least seems happy.
So does this mean that you can NOT run postfix in
Hi all,
May be this question is better to post on -pf or -jail but I really
don't know where the problem is. So post here first.
I have a FreeBSD-8.0-RELEASE-p2 box with two NICs acting as gateway
using pf (with ftp-proxy enabled) in my home network configured as follow:
LAN: 10.7.13.0/24
Hi all,
May be this question is better to post on -pf or -jail but I really
don't know where the problem is. So post here first.
I have a FreeBSD-8.0-RELEASE-p2 box with two NICs acting as gateway
using pf (with ftp-proxy enabled) in my home network configured as follow:
LAN: 10.7.13.0/24 ( +
First, Thanks all for the help with my previous sendmail question. I
rebuilt the jail without postfix and that at least seems happy.
The main question; has anyone built/ran dovecot in a jail? It runs
fine on the host system fine, but if I put it in a jail, I get issues
with the !import_try
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Jim stapleton...@gmail.com wrote:
First, Thanks all for the help with my previous sendmail question. I
rebuilt the jail without postfix and that at least seems happy.
So does this mean that you can NOT run postfix in a FreeBSD 8 Jail?
I didn't know this, I just
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Jim stapleton...@gmail.com wrote:
First, Thanks all for the help with my previous sendmail question. I
rebuilt the jail without postfix and that at least seems happy.
So does this mean
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I want to check the understanding of jails.
My understanding is a jail uses the existing kernel configuration and
cannot use its own kernel configuration.
Is this correct?
Thanks,
Jay
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
I want to check the understanding of jails.
My understanding is a jail uses the existing kernel configuration and
cannot use its own kernel configuration.
Is this correct?
Yes. The jail is being executed by the same kernel as the host system. The
jail just has restricted access to certain
hi
I running fbsd 6.2 and I would like to my first jail setup, but I have
this error when I start the jail (jail0):
srv1# /etc/rc.d/jail start
Configuring jails:.
Starting jails:ifconfig: interface alias does not exist
jail0.
srv1#
What I do wrong ?
Thanks in advance.
roberto
This is my
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Roberto Pereyra wrote:
hi
I running fbsd 6.2 and I would like to my first jail setup, but I have
this error when I start the jail (jail0):
srv1# /etc/rc.d/jail start
Configuring jails:.
Starting jails:ifconfig: interface alias does not exist
jail0.
srv1#
What I do wrong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Roberto Pereyra wrote:
hi
I running fbsd 6.2 and I would like to my first jail setup, but I have
this error when I start the jail (jail0):
srv1# /etc/rc.d/jail start
Configuring jails:.
Starting jails:ifconfig: interface alias does not
Thanks to all!!!
roberto
2007/4/26, Karol Kwiatkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Roberto Pereyra wrote:
hi
I running fbsd 6.2 and I would like to my first jail setup, but I have
this error when I start the jail (jail0):
srv1# /etc/rc.d/jail start
is there a way to configure a jail to use more than one ip address? in the
same sense of configuring an alias ip for any other freebsd host?
thanks,
jonathan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Jonathan Horne wrote:
is there a way to configure a jail to use more than one ip address?
in the same sense of configuring an alias ip for any other freebsd
host?
jail(8) only allows you one IP -- there are some patches around
which will let you create jails with more IPs, and even better
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 1:38 PM
To: Jonathan Horne
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: another jail question
Jonathan Horne wrote:
is there a way
is there a way to configure a jail to use more than one ip address? in the
same sense of configuring an alias ip for any other freebsd host?
IMHO not.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
is there a way to configure a jail to use more than one ip address?
in the same sense of configuring an alias ip for any other freebsd host?
IMHO not.
Not entirely true apparently. see http://blog.cg.nu/?p=9 for details of
someone who adapted PJD's patch for current
On 3/24/07, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a way to configure a jail to use more than one ip address? in the
same sense of configuring an alias ip for any other freebsd host?
As others have posted, not without either doing IP address
manipulation or using the patches
On 11.02.2007 12:54, * Dino Vliet wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm installing a nice system to use as my multimedia
box and already succeeded with geom-mirror. I want to
use a jail to isolate the p2p applications like
amule/emule and want to make sure that they only write
to an encrypted disk
Hi folks,
I'm installing a nice system to use as my multimedia
box and already succeeded with geom-mirror. I want to
use a jail to isolate the p2p applications like
amule/emule and want to make sure that they only write
to an encrypted disk (currently RTFM on geli and gbde)
However, I was
Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm installing a nice system to use as my multimedia
box and already succeeded with geom-mirror. I want to
use a jail to isolate the p2p applications like
amule/emule and want to make sure that they only write
to an encrypted disk (currently
I have some jails. On 5.3R i386
Some software (some C based, some java) for various reasons, like
licensing, look at all the IP addresses/interfaces available in the
running system.
Inside the jail they return more than just the jails IP address. For
example, FrontBase database
Hey,
I would like to use sendmail only to send daily reports of it's own host
and it's running jails, to an outside mail system!
host (192.168.0.2) with sendmail - should send mail/reports etc to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jail1 (192.168.0.3) with sendmail - should send mail/reports etc to
[EMAIL
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:01:38PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
I would like to use sendmail only to send daily reports of it's own host
and it's running jails, to an outside mail system!
host (192.168.0.2) with sendmail - should send mail/reports etc to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jail1
Hey,
I'm a freebsd newbie. I was experimenting with jails. I've build an
entire jail under /usr/local/jail/test which I'm accessing through the
network using ssh.
I thought that you can't grep any path or any information outside the
jail but when I use the command df, I can clearly see the disk
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hey,
I'm a freebsd newbie. I was experimenting with jails. I've build an
entire jail under /usr/local/jail/test which I'm accessing through the
network using ssh.
I thought that you can't grep any path or any information outside the
jail but when I
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:35:11PM +0100, Paul Everlund typed:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hey,
I'm a freebsd newbie. I was experimenting with jails. I've build an
entire jail under /usr/local/jail/test which I'm accessing through the
network using ssh.
I thought that
Hi,
I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home server
one for work sensitive data, the other for personal fun stuff.
However i only have 1 ip at my house [static].
Could i take the server taht will have jails on it, put it behind
a natd box so it has 2 ip's [192.168.0.1 and .2] and
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:27:33AM -0500, Jeff MacDonald typed:
Hi,
I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home server
one for work sensitive data, the other for personal fun stuff.
However i only have 1 ip at my house [static].
Could i take the server taht will have jails on
At 2002-12-04T14:27:33Z, Jeff MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could i take the server taht will have jails on it, put it behind a natd
box so it has 2 ip's [192.168.0.1 and .2] and just make the nat box,
forward packets to teh appropriate jail based upon what port they come in
on ?
Yep.
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
Hi,
I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home server
one for work sensitive data, the other for personal fun stuff.
However i only have 1 ip at my house [static].
Could i take the server taht will have jails on it, put it behind
a
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
Hi,
I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home server
one for work sensitive data, the other for personal fun stuff.
However i only have 1 ip at my house [static].
Could i take the server taht will have jails on it, put it behind
a
Jeff MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home server
one for work sensitive data, the other for personal fun stuff.
However i only have 1 ip at my house [static].
Could i take the server taht will have jails on it, put it behind
a
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Dan Pelleg
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:08 AM
To: Jeff MacDonald
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another Jail Question
Jeff MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I have been thinking about running 2 jails on my home
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
You can run PostgreSQL in a jail - though you do need to turn the
jail.sysvipc_allowed sysctl on first. You can also run it in the host
environment and talk via TCP if you wish.
some folks have said this is a security risk, as the shared mem is
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Another Jail Question
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
Yeah, i think i'll go the safe route and keep away from shared memory as
such will likly run it on the host.
not sure what your sparc is, but you might look at putting postgresql over
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
I run qmail, cause combined with vpopmail, it kicks ass for virtual
domains.
Postfix with CyrusIMAPd v2.2, cause, well, Cyrus IMAPd is just in a class
all its own :)
Note that CyrusIMAPd was extended several months back to do full virtual
domain under
, or is it a matter of know what direcotires
to make.. etc ?
jeff.
-Original Message-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Jeff MacDonald
Cc: Alex Hayward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Another Jail Question
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff
server is a dual PII 300 with 512 megs of ram, this should be fine
to handle 2 jails, right ?
unless you start gettinjg into high memory circumstances (ie.
jakarta-tomcat is a major dog for memory), 2 wouldn't be a problem ...
Just for comparison...
I'm running four jails -
-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Jeff MacDonald
Cc: Alex Hayward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Another Jail Question
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
I run qmail, cause combined with vpopmail, it kicks
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
server is a dual PII 300 with 512 megs of ram, this should be fine
to handle 2 jails, right ?
unless you start gettinjg into high memory circumstances (ie.
jakarta-tomcat is a major dog for memory), 2 wouldn't be a problem ...
Just
PM
To: Jeff MacDonald
Cc: Alex Hayward; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Another Jail Question
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
wow, the sieve filtering really turns me on [yuck i know].
currently with qmail/vpopmail i've not found a really great
way to do filtering of things
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote:
Any idea when it will be merged into the main code base ?
i tend to stay away from development branches..
not sure, I believe not until 2.2 is fully released ... since I'm one of
the ones that pushed for it to happen, I kinda had to be one of those
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:47:10PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hardly any traffic... it's an internal dev machine hit by about 10
people...
101 Jails:
last pid: 13467; load averages: 21.09, 13.50, 19.54up 17+12:23:50 13:43:55
1576 processes:4 running, 1572
68 matches
Mail list logo
