Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning fsync on
Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on any of the BSDs
... the post has to do with how fsync works on the various OSs, and am
curious as to whether or not this is something that also afflicts us:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:33:52 -0300 (ADT)
Marc G. Fournier scra...@hub.org wrote:
Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning
fsync on Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on
any of the BSDs ... the post has to do with how fsync works on the
various
On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning fsync on
Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on any of the BSDs
... the post has to do with how fsync works on the various OSs, and am
curious as to
On 10/26/10 21:17, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning fsync on
Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on any of the BSDs ...
the post has to do with how fsync works on the
On Oct 26, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning fsync on
Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on any of the BSDs
... the post has to do with how fsync works on the various OSs, and am
curious as to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/5/10 2:43 AM, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
On 5 June 2010 00:58, Adam PAPAI w...@wooh.hu wrote:
How can I tune my disk to make it faster? Is it possible? What is the
reason of the really slow I/O with more than 4 threads? What do you
recommend me
On 6/5/10 3:36 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
Some quick tests show that ufs does do rather poorly on my system too. I have
the following filesystems setup:
/var : ufs with softupdates
/usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled
/usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
/home : zfs with compression
/var : ufs with softupdates
/usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled
/usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
/home : zfs with compression disabled and checksums enabled
I ran a test with a blocksize of 8KB and 16 threads.
/var : 25.2MB/s
/usr/obj : 64.8MB/s
/usr/src : 386.3MB/s
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:50:15 +0200
Stefan Miklosovic miklosovic.free...@gmail.com wrote:
/var : ufs with softupdates
/usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled
/usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
/home : zfs with compression disabled and checksums enabled
I ran a test with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/5/10 1:04 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:50:15 +0200
Stefan Miklosovic miklosovic.free...@gmail.com wrote:
/var : ufs with softupdates
/usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled
/usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
/home :
/usr/src : zfs with compression enabled
/usr/src : 386.3MB/s
Do I understand it well? It seems that zfs with compression enabled on
/usr/src with 8KB block size and 16 threads performs 386.3MB/s which
is about 6 times better than debian5? I am thinking about this image
On Saturday 05 June 2010 01:58:35 Adam PAPAI wrote:
Why FreeBSD is supreme with 1 and 2 thread. And why is it 2 and 3 times
slower with 4-8-16-32 threads compared to Debian? The first two tests (1
thread and 2 thread) showed me that FreeBSD is supreme in I/O, but later
tests showed me, that it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
A week ago I started to benchmark Linux vs. FreeBSD on a Dell Poweredge
1850.
CPU: 2 x 3.4Ghz Xeon (Dual Core)
Memory: 8GB (4x2)
Disk: 1 x SEAGATE ST373454LC D404 (SCSI)
FreeBSD kazoku 8.0-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p3 #0: Tue May 25
On 5 June 2010 00:58, Adam PAPAI w...@wooh.hu wrote:
How can I tune my disk to make it faster? Is it possible? What is the
reason of the really slow I/O with more than 4 threads? What do you
recommend me to do? Why is it damn slow with 8K blocksize?
Does linux still have async disk writes by
On Saturday 05 June 2010 00:58:35 Adam PAPAI wrote:
Why FreeBSD is supreme with 1 and 2 thread. And why is it 2 and 3 times
slower with 4-8-16-32 threads compared to Debian? The first two tests (1
thread and 2 thread) showed me that FreeBSD is supreme in I/O, but later
tests showed me, that
Hi!
I know I posted a similar question two days ago, sorry - I?m
still in trouble with finding a proper wlan-card.
The hardware database on the freebsd-site did not help me:
most cards are either not avaiable in Austria or simply to expensive.
So my question is:
Has anybody found a cheap
ive been looking for this too im about to order netgear wg511t and
wg311t cards
from the google searches ive done they look to be supported
Arden
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 20:01, Florian Hengstberger wrote:
Hi!
I know I posted a similar question two days ago, sorry - I?m
still in trouble
-Original Message-
From: Florian Hengstberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:01 PM
To: FreeBSD mailinglist
Subject: Linux vs FreeBSD: wlan-cards
Hi!
I know I posted a similar question two days ago, sorry - I?m
still in trouble with finding
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:01:26 +0200
Florian Hengstberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I know I posted a similar question two days ago, sorry - I?m
still in trouble with finding a proper wlan-card.
The hardware database on the freebsd-site did not help me:
most cards are either not avaiable
We're still plugging away at getting this to work ... I haven't given up
on FreeBSD for this yet ...
Have a Linux guy here that's been helping to debug this, and one of the
question that he had was whether or not our ncplogin supports NDS ...
apparently, the ncplib we have in ports doesn't
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote:
An upgrade consists of the following commands:
'cvsup -g -L2 stable-supfile cd /usr/src/ make buildworld
make buildkernel KERNCONF=whatever make installkernel
KERNCONF=whatever make installworld reboot'
Theoretically you could just
W. D. wrote:
At 20:39 10/23/2002, Dan Pelleg, wrote:
FreeBSD systems are easy to maintain. You can do a source upgrade,
or a binary upgrade, and the system will go through it and boot
to the new version without a hitch. On one system I have I've gone from
FreeBSD 4.1 to 4.7, including every
W. D. writes:
At 20:39 10/23/2002, Dan Pelleg, wrote:
FreeBSD systems are easy to maintain. You can do a source upgrade,
or a binary upgrade, and the system will go through it and boot
to the new version without a hitch. On one system I have I've gone from
FreeBSD 4.1 to 4.7, including
--- Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to start a Linux/FreeBSD flamewar, but I do need some info
I have an associate who will be making major changes to their network
and want my help/advice. He intends to have a something like this:
, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD
--- Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to start a Linux/FreeBSD flamewar, but I do need some info
I have an associate who will be making major changes to their network
and want my help/advice. He intends to have a something
As has been said, the clients don't care much what the router is
running as long as it handles the packets correctly.
I would strongly recommend FreeBSD for this and this is based on my
experience in a mixed FreeBSD/Linux shop.
FreeBSD has excellent support for intelligent and traditional
From: Dan Pelleg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:39 PM
Subject: RE: Linux vs. FreeBSD
As has been said, the clients don't care much what the router is
running as long as it handles the packets correctly.
I would strongly
At 20:39 10/23/2002, Dan Pelleg, wrote:
FreeBSD systems are easy to maintain. You can do a source upgrade,
or a binary upgrade, and the system will go through it and boot
to the new version without a hitch. On one system I have I've gone from
FreeBSD 4.1 to 4.7, including every release in between,
Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have an associate who will be making major changes to their network
and want my help/advice. He intends to have a something like this:
Web server (Public IP)
inet - router( Public IP) --- /
29 matches
Mail list logo
