On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:42:00PM -0400, Chris Hill wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:27:34AM -0400, Chris Hill wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I guess
that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:15:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Chad Perrin wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I
guess that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
What version number would you call some time ago? I just used Ctrl-Q
about six
On Fri,08/07/09 [09:32:38], Daniel Underwood wrote:
I'd really love to see chromium ported over.
ditto. But now I'm pretty happy with that new firefox-3.5 which seems pretty
faster than previous version and still light enough for my old 1.6G
celeron-powered laptop.
--
Best regards,
Jeff
|
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:55:08 +0400, Jeff Laine wtf.jla...@gmail.com wrote:
But now I'm pretty happy with that new firefox-3.5 which seems pretty
faster than previous version and still light enough for my old 1.6G
celeron-powered laptop.
May I guess what I should consider light enough for my
ditto. But now I'm pretty happy with that new firefox-3.5 which seems pretty
faster than previous version and still light enough for my old 1.6G
celeron-powered laptop.
Nice. I haven't tried 3.5 yet.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:55:08AM +0400, Jeff Laine wrote:
On Fri,08/07/09 [09:32:38], Daniel Underwood wrote:
I'd really love to see chromium ported over.
ditto. But now I'm pretty happy with that new firefox-3.5 which seems pretty
faster than previous version and still light enough for
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:27:34AM -0400, Chris Hill wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I guess
that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
What version number would you call some time ago? I just used
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:27:34AM -0400, Chris Hill wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I guess
that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
What version number would you call some time ago? I just used Ctrl-Q
about six hours or so ago.
--
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
Has anyone tested Arora?
I wouldn't recommend Arora as a lightweight browser to anyone who isn't
already using applications built with the Qt toolkit. If you're a KDE
user, it may be a good choice; if you aren't, it spectacularly
Chad Perrin wrote:
Firefox has not had Ctrl-Q for some time. Try Alt-F followed by Q. I guess
that's 2.5 keystrokes, but at least it's keystrokes.
What version number would you call some time ago? I just used Ctrl-Q
about six hours or so ago.
The FreeBSD machine with Firefox is down but
I'd really love to see chromium ported over.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:32:38AM -0400, Daniel Underwood wrote:
I'd really love to see chromium ported over.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Randall Wood wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
Has anyone tested Arora?
I'm actually surprised no one has recommended Konqueror. It's not my
favorite browser (I happen to love Opera) but it would seem to mostly fit the
bill of fast,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
Has anyone tested Arora?
I'm actually surprised no one has recommended Konqueror. It's not my favorite
browser (I happen to love Opera) but it would seem to mostly fit the bill of
fast, graphical. One trick it does that I
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 09:57:30 Randall Wood wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
Has anyone tested Arora?
I'm actually surprised no one has recommended Konqueror. It's not my
favorite browser (I happen to love Opera) but it would seem to mostly fit
Has anyone tested Arora?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:36 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
Firefox even seems to lack a key to quit the program. :-)
That's easy. Just press Ctrl+Q and it'll close Firefox
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:32:49AM -0400, Daniel Underwood wrote:
Can anyone suggest a fast graphical web browser? I use Firefox
(because every page displays well and I can sync bookmarks), and I
also use elinks (when graphics don't matter). I'm looking for some
middle ground, a browser
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:32:49AM -0400, Daniel Underwood wrote:
Can anyone suggest a fast graphical web browser? I use Firefox
(because every page displays well and I can sync bookmarks), and I
also use elinks (when graphics don't matter). I'm looking for some
middle ground, a browser
Midori seems to have problems displaying Gmail.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
...@cbtl.de
Subject: Re: Looking for fast graphical web browser
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: 200907311230.02216.w.rieg...@cbtl.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Give Midori a try. Of course it's a young project and maybe
there are not all
of the features
Can anyone suggest a fast graphical web browser? I use Firefox
(because every page displays well and I can sync bookmarks), and I
also use elinks (when graphics don't matter). I'm looking for some
middle ground, a browser that can display most sites well but is
faster (or more lightweight) than
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:32:49 -0400
Daniel Underwood djuatde...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone suggest a fast graphical web browser?
Opera.
Andreas
--
GnuPG key : 0x2A573565|http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/de/
Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565
pgptocbRDDx3X.pgp
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:55:53 +0200, Andreas Rudisch cyb.@gmx.net wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:32:49 -0400
Daniel Underwood djuatde...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone suggest a fast graphical web browser?
Opera.
Traditionally, I would have suggested Opera too, because it has
been my favourite
Give Midori a try. Of course it's a young project and maybe there are not all
of the features of Firefox or Opera, but Midori is lightweight and really
fast. It's based on WebKit, so there should be no problem with standard
conform websites.
Wolfgang
Furthermore, there's lots of stuff now
bundled with the Opera web browser that I (personally) found
no use for, such as a mail client, IRC client, torrent client,
and some other stuff that could easily be called bloatware.
Yeah, I share your take on Opera.
Give Midori a try. Of course it's
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:47:11 +0200
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
versions, I saw it getting... hmmm... how do I tell best? It's
getting more slower in overall handling, and it often stops
working completely (several seconds)
I have not noticed such behaviour yet.
problem with Firefox.
I would use Opera as an alternative to Firefox. If I can find a way
to sync bookmarks across Opera browsers, I'll give it a try.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
I would use Opera as an alternative to Firefox. If I can find a way
to sync bookmarks across Opera browsers, I'll give it a try.
I didn't realize Opera has built-in synchronization. That's pretty nice.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:04:22 +0200, Andreas Rudisch cyb.@gmx.net wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:47:11 +0200
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
versions, I saw it getting... hmmm... how do I tell best? It's
getting more slower in overall handling, and it often stops
working completely
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:04:22 +0200, Andreas Rudisch cyb.@gmx.net wrote:
I never get the argument about 'bloatware' when it comes to Opera.
Only for newer versions. I found the older versions a bit easier
to configure, especially
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:10:49AM -0400, Daniel Underwood wrote:
Perfect, yes! Midori is precisely what I need! Many thanks.
I use Midori as a backup browser sometimes, but be aware that it's pretty
buggy, and interface design could use a little help.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:36 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:15:32PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
Firefox even seems to lack a key to quit the program. :-)
That's easy. Just press Ctrl+Q and it'll close Firefox immediately.
Negative for
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:10:07PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:56:36 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
That's easy. Just press Ctrl+Q and it'll close Firefox immediately.
Negative for firefox-2.0.0.12,1 (on my desktop system) - no Ctrl+Q. :-)
I don't
34 matches
Mail list logo
