On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 21:55, Gerard Seibert wrote:
RW wrote:
What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
linproc/compat/linux/proc
Boris Samorodov wrote:
I tried it and it didn't work. Irrespective of whether it should begin
linproc
or linprocfs, /compat is a link to /usr/compat, and /usr isn't mounted at
that point. Do you have a different arrangement?
Would it be possible to submit the output of 'dmesg'
On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
Can't confirm that the problem exists:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD srv.sem.ipt.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Wed May 17
23:26:59 MSD 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SRV i386
On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
Can't confirm that the problem exists:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD srv.sem.ipt.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Wed May 17
23:26:59 MSD 2006 [EMAIL
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:39 +0100 RW wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
Can't confirm that the problem exists:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD srv.sem.ipt.ru 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Wed May 17
23:26:59 MSD 2006
On Thursday 31 August 2006 16:26, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:39 +0100 RW wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
but it's complaining that /compat/linux
Who? Can you provide us with some more
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:31:33 +0100 RW wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 16:26, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:44:39 +0100 RW wrote:
On Thursday 31 August 2006 10:09, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:22:03 +0100 RW wrote:
but it's complaining that
On Thursday 31 August 2006 22:12, Boris Samorodov wrote:
Move this line down and place it after mounting of /usr.
Thanks.
That was actually one of the first things I tried, I guess I must have
screwed-up something else at the time.
___
What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
linproc/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
But in a standard installation, this mount-point is really under /usr, which
isn't mounted until pass 2
RW wrote:
What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
linproc/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
But in a standard installation, this mount-point is really under /usr, which
isn't
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 21:55, Gerard Seibert wrote:
RW wrote:
What's the canonical way of mounting the Linux procfs at boot-time?
I've seen several recommendations to add the following to fstab:
linproc/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
But in a standard
11 matches
Mail list logo
