http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=29968highlight=nfsd
Found this which I think says it all at the conclusion.
March 30th, 2012
Received some information from the FreeBSD mailing list and apparently
exporting NFS from an jailed environment is not possible. For those who
have managed
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=29968highlight=nfsd
Found this which I think says it all at the conclusion.
you are truly funny.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Now here is the KEY. No where does it say it has the server side
function, only the client side.
/usr/ports/net/unfs3
Even if someone proved that it doesn't do NFS server work, i will
continue to use it as NFS server, because it works very well ;)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Now here is the KEY. No where does it say it has the server side
function, only the client side.
/usr/ports/net/unfs3
Even if someone proved that it doesn't do NFS server work, i will
continue to use it as NFS server, because it works very well ;)
Since your the
Since your the expert on unfs3 because you have it working, would you share
some technical configuration information with us?
Such as
What statements do you have in the host:server and remote:client /etc/rc.conf
to auto start them at boot time?
in client - as with any NFS, use kernel
Many thanks in advance.
Quick answer is No, NFS only runs on the host system.
but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
Really? Is that stable enough to serve files for months without disruption?
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
Many thanks in advance.
Quick answer is No, NFS only runs on the host system.
but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
--
Sent from my Android phone with
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Many thanks in advance.
Quick answer is No, NFS only runs on the host system.
but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
Close but no cigar.
In the ports system it's named unfs3 and described as
UNFS3 is a user-space implementation of the NFSv3 server
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:36:04AM -0400, Fbsd8 typed:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Many thanks in advance.
Quick answer is No, NFS only runs on the host system.
but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
Close but no cigar.
In the ports system it's named unfs3 and described as
Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:36:04AM -0400, Fbsd8 typed:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Many thanks in advance.
Quick answer is No, NFS only runs on the host system.
but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
Close but no cigar.
In the ports system it's named unfs3 and
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Dealing with this has been SOP practice in jails since their inception.
See man 8 jail. The best way to run the NFS server is from the jail.
Running it host side is the hard part.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:42:45AM -0400, Fbsd8 typed:
Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 08:36:04AM -0400, Fbsd8 typed:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Many thanks in advance.
Quick answer is No, NFS only runs on the host system.
but user space nfsd works. in ports - unfsd
Close
blackfriar wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'm wondering if it's possible to run in a clear fashion an NFS server
within a jail on FreeBSD 9.0.
I'm having some issues that make me think this is not supposed to work.
I've googled it but I couldn't find much especially on releases prior
5!!
A quick tip
Clear!
Thanks a lot.
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 10:02 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote:
blackfriar wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'm wondering if it's possible to run in a clear fashion an NFS server
within a jail on FreeBSD 9.0.
I'm having some issues that make me think this is not supposed to work.
I've
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Long answer is; NFS requires rpcbind to function. rpcbind is dependent on
a network stack. Jails do not have their own network stack, they use the
hosts network stack.
Dealing with this has been SOP practice in jails since
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:55:51 -0500, Adam Vande More
amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a number of people who have reached the
opposite decision concerning VIMAGE/VNET enabled jails. They are much
easier to work with and provide nice capabilities.
I tried it on 9.0-RELEASE and was
Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Long answer is; NFS requires rpcbind to function. rpcbind is dependent on
a network stack. Jails do not have their own network stack, they use the
hosts network stack.
Dealing with this has been SOP
Hi everybody!
I'm wondering if it's possible to run in a clear fashion an NFS server
within a jail on FreeBSD 9.0.
I'm having some issues that make me think this is not supposed to work.
I've googled it but I couldn't find much especially on releases prior
5!!
A quick tip would be great I
18 matches
Mail list logo
