Martes G Wigglesworth wrote:
A year, or two, ago, I found such information buried within the Juniper
website; however, upon recent attempts at further investigation, both
for learning about certifications, and subject matter for this topic, I
am unable to locate said information. The historic
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com writes:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:54:24 -0500
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
However,
commercial routers generally do not use their OS kernel this way -- it
is far more common that the kernel does send and receive packets
within its
Martes G Wigglesworth mar...@mgwigglesworth.com writes:
Thanks again for further information on this topic.
Where can I find more information this as a research topic. I am
talking about Academic/PHD-level information or industry-level
information.
Academic and commercial information
Greetings List.
If I am sending to the wrong list, then please let me know what would
have been a more appropriate choice.
I am attempting to research what is meant when, I saw that Juniper had
re-written the network stack from the base freebsd network stack, to
what is used in JUNOS. What
I am attempting to research what is meant when, I saw that Juniper had
re-written the network stack from the base freebsd network stack, to
what is used in JUNOS. What exactly is meant by this? What is included
in the network stack, when mentioned that it was completely re-written?
ask
Thank you very much for the intuitive commentary.
Sorry for making the inquiry so specific to Juniper, however, I could
not think of another source that would be a good example. I fully
understand how the inquiries appeared, however, thanks for answering
what you could.
The inquiry was meant
Martes G Wigglesworth mar...@mgwigglesworth.com writes:
I am attempting to research what is meant when, I saw that Juniper had
re-written the network stack from the base freebsd network stack, to
what is used in JUNOS. What exactly is meant by this? What is included
in the network stack,
Thank you very much for the intuitive commentary.
Sorry for making the inquiry so specific to Juniper, however, I could
not think of another source that would be a good example. I fully
understand how the inquiries appeared, however, thanks for answering
what you could.
can't you simply ask
I very much doubt that marketing issues were a significant issue.
Off-the-shelf OS networking has always fallen short of supporting
it wasn't made for that.
As someone else already mentioned in this thread, supporting hardware
offload for forwarding is a major issue. Core routers (or even
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl writes:
I very much doubt that marketing issues were a significant issue.
Off-the-shelf OS networking has always fallen short of supporting
it wasn't made for that.
It can be. I've written portable IP stacks intended for exactly this
purpose.
I very much doubt that marketing issues were a significant issue.
Off-the-shelf OS networking has always fallen short of supporting
it wasn't made for that.
It can be. I've written portable IP stacks intended for exactly this
Of course it can. i just write that FreeBSD network stack WASN'T
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:35:35 -0500
Martes G Wigglesworth mar...@mgwigglesworth.com wrote:
However, the intuitive list member response strikes again.
Thanks alot for you input.
I, as you, can't really figure out why they felt, years ago, that they
needed to re-invent the wheel.
Bear in
A year, or two, ago, I found such information buried within the Juniper
website; however, upon recent attempts at further investigation, both
for learning about certifications, and subject matter for this topic, I
am unable to locate said information. The historic Juniper blurbs
were very
Thanks again for further information on this topic.
Where can I find more information this as a research topic. I am
talking about Academic/PHD-level information or industry-level
information.
(I mean that I am looking at this from a knowledge-base expansion point
of view, so don't filter out
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl writes:
I very much doubt that marketing issues were a significant issue.
Off-the-shelf OS networking has always fallen short of supporting
it wasn't made for that.
It can be. I've written portable IP stacks intended for exactly this
Of
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:54:24 -0500
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
However,
commercial routers generally do not use their OS kernel this way -- it
is far more common that the kernel does send and receive packets
within its native IP stack.
If I'm understanding
16 matches
Mail list logo
