On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:57 PM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
I thought MacOS X's rsync did handle resource forks if you gave it the
proper option. The resource fork is reported by rsync in the usual
convention of having ._ prefixed to the filename.
My understanding was that the files named ._foo were
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.comwrote:
Thank you for the detailed description of what resource forks are. One
more clue in this mystery is that appending .mov extension to it fixes the
problem.
That makes some sense, since without the resource fork some
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of
the file checksums while this is running?
MacOS X comes with a shasum utility which implements SHA-256 checksums,
so you should be able to
On 12 July 2013, at 10:49, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of
the file checksums while this is running?
MacOS X comes with a
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org wrote:
Dropping the list …
On Jul 12, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
Checksums are the same. All other files still work however the HUGE
rendered Final Cut Pro output, so I guess it is something
I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I
generally use it instead of the copy command because if the copy fails on
large files, I can pick up where I left off. I have backed up entire Final
Cut Pro projects this way with no issues. However, I recently synced a
drive to
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:35:00 -0700, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I
generally use it instead of the copy command because if the copy fails
on large files, I can pick up where I left off. I have backed up
entire Final
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
keram...@ceid.upatras.grwrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:35:00 -0700, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com
wrote:
I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I
generally use it instead of the copy command because if the copy
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:48:03 -0700, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
keram...@ceid.upatras.grwrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:35:00 -0700, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until
Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of
the file checksums while this is running?
MacOS X comes with a shasum utility which implements SHA-256 checksums,
so you should be able to look at a few random samples of these files,
e.g. by running on the source disk:
10 matches
Mail list logo
