Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:48:26 +0100
From: woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
To: millenia2...@hotmail.com
CC: f...@bomgardner.net; ch...@monochrome.org; cho...@charter.net;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Portsnap vs CSup
compiling the kernel on that could take several days
for sure not KDE, but X and FreeBSD itself with good software running on
it works FAST on 100Mhz machine with 48MB RAM.
Yes compiling is slow, but normal usage is FAST.
I never used gnome or KDE on it, ran Blackbox insted.
of course it's fast.
and even slower machines like 486/33
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:12:12 -0400, Sean Cavanaugh millenia2...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:48:26 +0100
for sure not KDE, but X and FreeBSD itself with good software running on
it works FAST on 100Mhz machine with 48MB RAM.
Yes compiling is slow, but normal usage is
