On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:04:03 -0500, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man portmaster). The -R
flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
the named port depends
-R
--upward-recursive
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man portmaster). The -R
flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
the named
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool recommended
over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my ports soon and
in the 18 months i've been using FreeBSD i've always used portupgrade but
sounds like it's best to change now.
jamie
On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@gnix.co.uk wrote:
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool recommended
over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my ports soon and
in the 18 months i've been using FreeBSD i've always used portupgrade
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@gnix.co.uk wrote:
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool
recommended over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my
ports soon
On 3 January 2011 18:39, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@gnix.co.uk wrote:
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool
recommended over
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:51:48PM -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man portmaster). The -R
flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
the named port depends
On 27/12/2010 01:32, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Rob == Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net writes:
Rob Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob the other hand, Doug Barton has been very
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 27/12/2010 01:32, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Rob == Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net writes:
Rob Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:39:58AM -0800, Ron (Lists) wrote:
But, due to portupgrade no longer being maintained and failing to work
anymore,
I'm a bit confused about this. I did a quick google search and saw that
someone had stopped maintaining portupgrade, but I also saw things that
suggested
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 13:42, Bob Hall rjh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:39:58AM -0800, Ron (Lists) wrote:
But, due to portupgrade no longer being maintained and failing to work
anymore,
I'm a bit confused about this. I did a quick google search and saw that
someone had
Rob == Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net writes:
Rob Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob the other hand, Doug Barton has been very responsive to issues with
Rob portmaster and fixed
Quoth Randal L. Schwartz on Sunday, 26 December 2010:
Rob == Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net writes:
Rob Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob the other hand, Doug Barton has been
14 matches
Mail list logo
