On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:54:31 -0400
Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
64 bit Celerons, and 64 bit Xenons?
amd64 and ia64 (assuming you're referring to Xeon architecture, and not Xenon
gas :P)
--
Regards,
Ghirai.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:07:02 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPUs again. On
Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:54:31 -0400 Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
64 bit Celerons, and 64 bit Xenons? amd64 and ia64 (assuming you're
@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 3:12 PM
Subject: RE: CPUs again.
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:07:02 +0300 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPUs
again. On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:54:31 -0400 Grant Peel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 64
Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Understood,
Does the default GENERIC kernel see them as i386 or amd64 when
booting then?, or does using amd64 require a custom kernel?
The kernel and the rest of the system are compiled for i386 or amd64.
You can run amd64 software on amd64 architecture
]
To: Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: CPUs again.
Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Understood,
Does the default GENERIC kernel see them as i386 or amd64 when
booting then?, or does using amd64 require a custom kernel
--
From: Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:08 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CPUs again.
So,
Given the output below, is there any real benifit to compiling a custom
kernel with an amd64 machine type
