On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:40:37 -0700
Atom Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/24/06, Jason Lixfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23-May-06, at 8:48 PM, Atom Powers wrote:
I have no all.log currently. The only thing showing up in
messages though is:
You have to enable all.log in
On 23-May-06, at 8:48 PM, Atom Powers wrote:
On 5/23/06, Jason Lixfeld jason+lists.freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using openssh-portable and the latest versions of openldap,
pam_ldap and nss_ldap. It appears as though the system is using
...
I'm not using ssh-portable, but I have it
On 5/24/06, Jason Lixfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23-May-06, at 8:48 PM, Atom Powers wrote:
I have no all.log currently. The only thing showing up in messages
though is:
You have to enable all.log in syslog.conf, and then touch
/var/log/all.log. I always turn this on because it can
I don't seem to have this problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$finger apowers
finger: apowers: no such user
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$id apowers
uid=1133(apowers) gid=1133(apowers) groups=1133(apowers), 0(wheel)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ssh localhost
Password:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE (SMP) #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC
On 5/24/06, Jason Lixfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23-May-06, at 8:48 PM, Atom Powers wrote:
%ls -al
Assertion failed: (cfg-ldc_uris[__session.ls_current_uri] != NULL),
function do_init, file ldap-nss.c, line 1193.
Abort (core dumped)
%
I was able to reproduce this problem when I removed
Have you tried nss_ldap without pam?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atom Powers
Sent: May 24, 2006 3:23 PM
To: Jason Lixfeld
Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List
Subject: Re: Trouble with nss|pam|openldap
On 5/24
On 24-May-06, at 6:15 PM, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Have you tried nss_ldap without pam?
How is that even possible?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
In the last episode (May 24), Jason Lixfeld said:
On 24-May-06, at 6:15 PM, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Have you tried nss_ldap without pam?
How is that even possible?
It's possible, but not too useful. If you always force people to ssh
in via keys, for example, you don't need pam_ldap. PAM
On 5/23/06, Jason Lixfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using openssh-portable and the latest versions of openldap,
pam_ldap and nss_ldap. It appears as though the system is using
...
I'm not using ssh-portable, but I have it working with the built-in ssh.
...
user password, even after I
