On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:14:04 +1000
Colin House articulated:
On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in
9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful
On 21 August 2013, at 18:14, Colin House co...@restecp.com wrote:
On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I
believe its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful
On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe
its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the
same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a
On 21 August 2013, at 17:02, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
On 21 August 2013, at 16:46, Frank Leonhardt fra...@fjl.co.uk wrote:
On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I
believe its also in 9.1. The command:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in
9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is
provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a
complete trace with lots
On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote:
There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe
its also in 9.1. The command:
dig freebsd.org +trace
Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the
same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a
Ignore my previously stated question. What I meant to say was:
*Why* do I need to have IPV6 enable ? Is it some configuration option
of named that I overlooked ?
On Feb 6, 2004, at 9:23, Luke Cowell wrote:
Hi I'm running FreeBSD 4.9 and I'm having a little difficulty with
named/dig.
%uname
Luke Cowell disturbed my sleep to write:
*Why* do I need to have IPV6 enable ? Is it some configuration option
of named that I overlooked ?
Hm...it could be that named is only listening on IPv6 localhost (::1)
rather than IPv4 (127.0.0.1) by default, but that seems strange to me.
Try grep
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, JoeB wrote:
How do I check my ISP domain name to see if it's DNS server is
configured correctly for email reverse DNS lookup? I have used dig
isp-domain-name but I can not tell from what it displays what to
look
for to verify it's configured correctly. The dig display is
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 03:24:07PM +, Stacey Roberts typed:
Hello,
I don't know if this is related to post earlier today [FBSD 4.7
reset itself - lots of DENY UDP messages in /var/log/security], but
I've been trying to trouble shoot the DENY messages in
/var/log/security using dig:
Hi Ruben,
Thanks much for the reply - comments inline...,
Verifying relevant ipfw rules:
# Allow out access to Internet Domain name server
$fwcmd add 00618 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup
keep-state
$fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup
Just checked against http://www.pgp.net/wwwkeys.html to verify:
pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26
Verbose:
Public Key Server -- Verbose Index ``0xDC92FBD7 ''
Type bits/keyIDDate User
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:18:10PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Just checked against http://www.pgp.net/wwwkeys.html to verify:
pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26
Verbose:
Public Key
Okay,
I've been hacking about with my ipfw rules in order to nail this
down, but I'm still coming up against a wall here..,
I've made this change:
# Allow out access to Internet Domain name server
$fwcmd add 00617 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup
keep-state
#$fwcmd add 00618
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:29:16PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Subject: Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY?
[related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in
/var/log/security
From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
Hi,
I've made the changes to rule 00618 as you've suggested, but now I get
a different error:
# dig .ns @a.root-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 .ns @a.root-servers.net
; (1 server found)
;; res_nmkquery: buffer too small
# dig .ns @b.root-servers.net
; DiG 8.3 .ns @b.root-servers.net
; (1 server
20:41:04 2002
;; MSG SIZE sent: 17 rcvd: 436
$
On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 18:09, D. Penev wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:29:16PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote:
Subject: Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY?
[related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages
17 matches
Mail list logo
