2009/1/29 Jon Radel j...@radel.com:
Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
dig +trace amnesiac.com
should start you down the
2009/1/29 Jon Radel j...@radel.com:
Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
dig +trace amnesiac.com
should start you down the
2009/1/30 Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com:
2009/1/29 Jon Radel j...@radel.com:
Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
dig +trace
For about four days now, I've had these emails stuck in my mailqueue,
and I don't understand what the problem is. Sure it says it has a DNS
failure, but what does it mean?
Jan 29 16:03:19 amnesiac sm-mta[38492]: n0RM2Hlj021695: to=**,
ctladdr=x...@amnesiac. (80/80), delay=1+18:01:02,
Chris Rees wrote:
For about four days now, I've had these emails stuck in my mailqueue,
and I don't understand what the problem is. Sure it says it has a DNS
failure, but what does it mean?
Jan 29 16:03:19 amnesiac sm-mta[38492]: n0RM2Hlj021695: to=**,
ctladdr=x...@amnesiac.
Chris Rees said:
For about four days now, I've had these emails stuck in my mailqueue,
and I don't understand what the problem is. Sure it says it has a DNS
failure, but what does it mean?
Jan 29 16:03:19 amnesiac sm-mta[38492]: n0RM2Hlj021695: to=**,
ctladdr=x...@amnesiac.
