Re: TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-09 Thread Wojciech Puchar
well last night i tested it with SCHED_4BSD instead of sched_ule, reduced quantum to 2 from 10 and for now - no voice chopping under high load. but i will test it more. What version of FreeBSD are you using for this? Yes, it matters. got RELENG_7 yesterday by cvs, now SCHED_ULE works

Re: TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-09 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: well last night i tested it with SCHED_4BSD instead of sched_ule, reduced quantum to 2 from 10 and for now - no voice chopping under high load. but i will test it more. What version of FreeBSD are you using for this?

Re: TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-07 Thread Wojciech Puchar
quantum to 2 from 10 and for now - no voice chopping under high load. but i will test it more. What version of FreeBSD are you using for this? Yes, it matters. 7.0 please give me few days to make more precise reports from my users and me being on place today (not just testing this

Re: TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-07 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Well, basically you are the only one who can answer that. And that's not a paradox or an attempt at humor. You should investigate. Maybe interrupts aren't processed fast enough (hardware sharing an interrupt?), or memory or kernel resources are low. well last night i tested it with SCHED_4BSD

Re: TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-07 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:18:32AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: Well, basically you are the only one who can answer that. And that's not a paradox or an attempt at humor. You should investigate. Maybe interrupts aren't processed fast enough (hardware sharing an interrupt?), or memory or

Re: TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-07 Thread Wojciech Puchar
for example when lots of spam comes to server and lots of resource hungry spamassassin processes are spawned our calls starts to be crappy. And that's why I always have isolated my telephony servers from normal-ISP tasks: They provide real-time tasks and should be running in memory only. i

TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-06 Thread Wojciech Puchar
is it possible on FreeBSD i run asterisk with realtime priority. it works perfectly no matter how much CPU is loaded by other non-telephony tasks. but with lots of VM pressure it starts to so... like like tha..that... what causes it to behave like that and how to fix it. for example when

Re: TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-06 Thread Roland Smith
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:21:01PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: is it possible on FreeBSD No, I think. i run asterisk with realtime priority. it works perfectly no matter how much CPU is loaded by other non-telephony tasks. but with lots of VM pressure it starts to so... like like

Re: TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-06 Thread Unga
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Wojciech is it possible on FreeBSD Its soft RT. Try to use the latest ULE scheduler. i run asterisk with realtime priority. it works perfectly no matter how much CPU is loaded by other non-telephony tasks. but with

TRUE realtime priority

2008-10-06 Thread Edwin Groothuis
for example when lots of spam comes to server and lots of resource hungry spamassassin processes are spawned our calls starts to be crappy. And that's why I always have isolated my telephony servers from normal-ISP tasks: They provide real-time tasks and should be running in memory only. Edwin