Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-06 Thread Wojciech Puchar
AFAIK the danger is that someone boots the machine with an installer for some other OS, and that installer treats the disk as unformatted -- hence obviously containing nothing important -- because it doesn't have a recognizable MBR. some people rarely boot other OS :)

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-06 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:28:32PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dangerous is probably overstating the issue a bit ... AFAIK the danger is that someone boots the machine with an installer for some other OS, and that installer treats the disk as unformatted -- hence obviously containing

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-06 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:16:00AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: AFAIK the danger is that someone boots the machine with an installer for some other OS, and that installer treats the disk as unformatted -- hence obviously containing nothing important -- because it doesn't have a

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-05 Thread perryh
Dangerous is probably overstating the issue a bit ... AFAIK the danger is that someone boots the machine with an installer for some other OS, and that installer treats the disk as unformatted -- hence obviously containing nothing important -- because it doesn't have a recognizable MBR.

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Da Rock
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:55 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: Da Rock writes: Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. 1) It IS possible to boot from a dedicated disk? Yes. Can't remember the last time I used anything else. So you've never booted from a disk that

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Robert Huff
Da Rock writes: Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. 1) It IS possible to boot from a dedicated disk? Yes. Can't remember the last time I used anything else. So you've never booted from a disk that has been partitioned as a file system?

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:47:23AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 11:39 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:17:40AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If FreeBSD is to put

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:57:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:55 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: Da Rock writes: Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. 1) It IS possible to boot from a dedicated disk? Yes. Can't remember the last

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I have never booted a FreeBSD system from a disk which contained any other operating system. I have only used dangerously dadicated mode for FreeBSD, except when sysinstall made selecting/implementing that too much work. almost like me except i don't use sysinstall, and manually

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-04 Thread Da Rock
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:49 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:57:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 20:55 -0500, Robert Huff wrote: Da Rock writes: Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. 1) It IS possible to

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-03 Thread Da Rock
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 11:39 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:17:40AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If FreeBSD is to put on the system as only operating system (Fdisk: A = Use Entire

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-03 Thread Robert Huff
Da Rock writes: Excuse my nose in here- I just have a couple of questions. 1) It IS possible to boot from a dedicated disk? Yes. Can't remember the last time I used anything else. 2) Does using dedicated mode increase the space available to use? Partitioning normally takes

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
ad0a (/), ad0b (swap), ad0d (/var) etc... correct or not (then what)? You're mixing terminology here. :-) The use entire disk will create a slice for FreeBSD covering the complete disk. A slice is what MICROS~1 calls primary partition. Now the conclusion: Let's say you create a slice on ad0,

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Pieter Donche
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Polytropon wrote: ad0 |---| the whole disk ad0s1 \--/ one slice ad0s1X \--/\---/\-/\-/\---/\/ partitions a b d e f g

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If FreeBSD is to put on the system as only operating system (Fdisk: A = Use Entire disk), then will the BSD-partitions will show up as ad0a (/), ad0b (swap), ad0d (/var) etc... correct or not (then what)? You're

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Pieter Donche wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Polytropon wrote: ad0 |---| the whole disk ad0s1 \--/ one slice ad0s1X

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:17:40AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:56:44 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If FreeBSD is to put on the system as only operating system (Fdisk: A = Use Entire disk), then will the BSD-partitions will show up as ad0a (/),

Re: UFS partitioning

2008-12-02 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:53:23 +0100 (CET), Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know / is the root partition, but /root is the home-directory of the user root (/etc/passwd: root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh). I doubt this will ever be needed to be large? There is no special advice about