On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:33:23AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:57:34 +0200, cpghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
Yep, you're right. I thought about a way to extend the API in a
backwards compatible way, but that's not as easy or straight
forward as it seems. In fact, it
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:59:45AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:57:34PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
Quite true!
I see even more ambiguity here: What about a versioned file pointed
to by hard links from two versioned directories?
The more I think about it, the more
Hi,
is there anybody working on a versioning file system for FreeBSD
right now?
Maybe something like what's discussed here?
http://www.pdl.cmu.edu/PDL-FTP/Secure/FAST03_abs.html
I don't care if it is native or a layer, geom-ified, fuse-based,
or even if it uses subversion as its backend
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:04:22PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
Hi,
is there anybody working on a versioning file system for FreeBSD
right now?
I don't care if it is native or a layer, geom-ified, fuse-based,
or even if it uses subversion as its backend, as long as it
provides some kind
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 06:37:55PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:04:22PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
Hi,
is there anybody working on a versioning file system for FreeBSD
right now?
I don't care if it is native or a layer, geom-ified, fuse-based,
or even if it uses
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 07:59:18PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
open(2) could open a file at an earlier revision:
FILE *filep;
s/FILE */int /;
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 07:59:18PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 06:37:55PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:04:22PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
Hi,
is there anybody working on a versioning file system for FreeBSD
right now?
I don't care
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:11:25 +0200, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
VMS had a filesystem that uses versioning:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Files-11]
That's the first thing that came into my mind when reading this
message. See LOGIN.COM;1 and then rm -rf /*.*;* :-)
But it's not had,
* cpghost cpgh...@cordula.ws [2009-06-24 17:04 +0200]:
Hi,
is there anybody working on a versioning file system for FreeBSD
right now?
- I don't know how fare along hammerfs is in being ported to FreeBSD.
But from what I have heard, feature-wise, it might be something that
meets your
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:11:25PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
Yes, that's one possibility. But just like Subversion (which I'm
using extensively here), it's not really transparent.
What is? If you have to extend the API like you propose below, all
programs that want to use that feature
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:26:50PM +0200, Morten Grunnet Buhl wrote:
* cpghost cpgh...@cordula.ws [2009-06-24 17:04 +0200]:
Hi,
is there anybody working on a versioning file system for FreeBSD
right now?
- I don't know how fare along hammerfs is in being ported to FreeBSD.
But from
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:57:34 +0200, cpghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
Yep, you're right. I thought about a way to extend the API in a
backwards compatible way, but that's not as easy or straight
forward as it seems. In fact, it opens a whole can of worms.
If the versioned file system isn't
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:57:34PM +0200, cpghost wrote:
Quite true!
I see even more ambiguity here: What about a versioned file pointed
to by hard links from two versioned directories?
The more I think about it, the more problems I can see. Look e.g. at
symbolic links. Or looking from the
13 matches
Mail list logo