I am not following this. If (X.org + some WM) is not a GUI,
how would you define
He probably equates a desktop environment (such as KDE/Gnome/etc.) to a GUI.
most people exactly equates that and i stated i that such defined GUI is
completely useless and actually takes over time and
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text
and graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config,
there are plenty of nice other wm's good for that.
I am not following this. If (X.org + some WM) is not a GUI,
how
Am Freitag 10 August 2007 10:57:38 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't use GUI. it takes a lot and gives nothing. i use both text
and graphic (X) based apps and no gui. i use fvwm2 with my config,
there are plenty of nice other wm's good for that.
I
