On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 07:40:37PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some tips,
Have a look at midori.
--
Harald Weis
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:16:05AM +0100, Harald Weis wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 07:40:37PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 19:40:37 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
I just use a hosts file and it works well (as long as you're not running
a web server on port 80
All I use is Adblock Plus. With the automatic updates I havent seen any
ad for month..
herb langhans
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
Quoting herbert langhans w...@langhans.com.pl:
All I use is Adblock Plus. With the automatic updates I havent seen any
ad for month..
I'll second this endorsement, i've been using it for a good few years
now and I just works :)
Mike Woods
Full of squishy cynicism
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 19:40:37 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
Simply deactivate Flash. :-)
There are several extensions for Firefox to make the web less
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:32:35 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
Today I don't need to deal with this question anymore. I've
been using a two browsers approach: Firefox with Flash
installed, everything works as intended, and Opera as my
main browser, with Flash deactivated, and quite picky
about what
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:44:18PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
07.01.2013, 05:43, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some tips
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some tips,
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Twenty-six
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some tips,
gary
For firefox I use the following
Hi there, Our web design students are doing a free website design program so
they can build up portfolio's and use them as example sites. I was
wondering if you would be in need of a custom website to help your business?
I would be glad to send you references and some example sites we have
Hi,
I'm trying to authenticate Dovecot to Active Directory using the
SAMBA/Winbind method and so far my setup seems that everything is
working apart from the Dovecot authentication which I believe I have
traced to PAM.
I can login using an AD account using:
wbinfo -K user
# wbinfo -K user
login using an AD account using:
wbinfo -K user
# wbinfo -K user
Enter user's password:
plaintext kerberos password authentication for [user] succeeded
(requesting cctype: FILE)
This is the current Dovecot config:
# cat dovecot.conf
# v1.1:
#auth_ntlm_use_winbind = yes
# v1.2
which of the many adblockers should i try?
thanks in advance for your insights!
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Voice By Computer (for Universal Access): http:/www.thought.org/vbc
The 8.57a release of Jottings:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 18:57, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
which of the many adblockers should i try?
thanks in advance for your insights!
imho Add Block Plus is the best
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service
Unix
Voice By Computer (for
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 17:06, Jason Garrett kinged...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 18:57, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
which of the many adblockers should i try?
thanks in advance for your insights!
imho Add Block Plus is the best
Agreed, and for further security, I
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM -0800, Kurt Buff wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:22:10 -0800
From: Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: which FF ad blocker?
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 17:06, Jason Garrett kinged...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:55:44PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
agree with noscript. i dont recall the other one, but i was
blocking just too much and opened everything up. i'll try
'add block plus'
I'm pretty sure the extension you want is called Adblock Plus, not Add
Block
Hi,
On Thursday 01 March 2012 07:57:53 Gary Kline wrote:
which of the many adblockers should i try?
I use /etc/hosts to block unwanted sites.
I used
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm
as a starting point and added other sites over time.
If course, adds which are served from the visited
domain
(accounting firm. Not much choice), I like to centralize all logins into AD
which is currently mixed 2003/2008 DCs. To achieve this with FreeBSD, I have
been using the following instructions since FreeBSD 6.1 and Samba 3.0 with the
exception that I built all the ports through the ports
I'm currently running 8.1-R without AHCI enabled, with a raidz zpool
based on /dev/ad* disks, plus one system disk that's UFS2, mounted using
partition labels. I need to enable AHCI in order to get hot pluggable
eSata capability, and that's going to rename the disks to /dev/ada*.
Will zfs
On 2 February 2011 16:29, Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote:
I'm currently running 8.1-R without AHCI enabled, with a raidz zpool based
on /dev/ad* disks, plus one system disk that's UFS2, mounted using partition
labels. I need to enable AHCI in order to get hot pluggable eSata
Hi FreeBSD Folks,
I'm using Samba 3.5.6 to authenticate logins and manage access on FreeBSD 8.1.
With Sudo 1.7.2, I was able to use Active Directory groups in sudoers(5), but
this doesn't seem to work in 1.7.4.
Versions:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD cis-mvl.ml.unisa.edu.au 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD
On 13/09/2010 4:45 PM, Omer Faruk SEN wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to sync my time against a ntp server on Active Directory
but no matter what i do ntpd did not sync against AD's NTP server.
ntpdate works perfectly against AD but not ntpd.
I think you will have trouble doing this. AD's time service
Hi,
I am trying to sync my time against a ntp server on Active Directory
but no matter what i do ntpd did not sync against AD's NTP server.
ntpdate works perfectly against AD but not ntpd.
Here is my ntpd.conf:
restrict default nomodify notrap noquery
restrict 127.0.0.1
server 10.0.0.85
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:45:22 +0300
Omer Faruk SEN omerf...@gmail.com wrote:
restrict default nomodify notrap noquery
restrict 127.0.0.1
server 10.0.0.85 !! Active Directory server (w2k8 r2)
Don't you also need a restrict line for 10.0.0.85?
--
Bruce Cran
On 27 April 2010 18:29, Mark G.
mark-fbsd-quest-10+20100...@giovannetti.ca wrote:
On 04/27/2010 00:04, Carl Johnson wrote:
Mark G.mark-fbsd-quest-10+20100...@giovannetti.ca writes:
[...]
I just wanted to know if there was a utility to tell me
which actual device was mounted. I also tried
On 04/27/2010 00:04, Carl Johnson wrote:
Mark G.mark-fbsd-quest-10+20100...@giovannetti.ca writes:
[...]
I just wanted to know if there was a utility to tell me
which actual device was mounted. I also tried camcontrol devlist
and atacontrol list. The latter allowed me to determine that
Hi,
I've tried the mount, tunefs and df manuals, and don't know
where to look next.
I am trying to find out what device, in terms of /dev/ad0s1a
and so on, is actually 'connected' to a label mounted file
system. Here is my fstab (from PC-BSD, by the way):
# more /etc/fstab
# Device
Mark G. mark-fbsd-quest-10+20100...@giovannetti.ca writes:
Hi,
I've tried the mount, tunefs and df manuals, and don't know
where to look next.
I am trying to find out what device, in terms of /dev/ad0s1a
and so on, is actually 'connected' to a label mounted file
system. Here is my fstab
Your AD will show up on this incredible map searching tool and it will be very
easy to find!
We love these guys ... check them out:
America's Car Show http://www.AmericasCarShow.com, broadcast live on Sirius XM
Radio ... listen to it live on Sundays 10pm EST - 12AM EST this is the
world's
Hello
My goal is to authenticate my Cyrus Imapd users against Windos 2003
Active Directory with Kerberos . I have the following setup:
Kerberos5 client
===
FreeBSD acsvfbsd06.domain.tld 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE
/etc/krb.conf:
[libdefaults]
default_realm = domain.tld
Hello Volodymyr
Am Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 09:42:22AM +0300 Volodymyr Kostyrko schrieb:
Martin Schweizer wrote:
So I have now no more ideas where I can check. Any hints are welcome.
I have done almost the same thing, only with pam:
grep sasl /etc/rc.conf
saslauthd_enable='yes'
Martin Schweizer wrote:
So I have now no more ideas where I can check. Any hints are welcome.
I have done almost the same thing, only with pam:
grep sasl /etc/rc.conf
saslauthd_enable='yes'
saslauthd_flags='-apam -n1'
cat /etc/pam.d/imap
auth required pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass
On Friday 31 July 2009 10:15:56 markham roan wrote:
A packet capture revealed a number of anomalies. Once the server starts
trying to join the domain, we get all sorts of TCP transmission errors,
retries, duplicate ACKs etc. In some cases, the public side of the
firewall will send an ICMP
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Mel Flynn
mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.netmel.flynn%2bfbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net
wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2009 10:15:56 markham roan wrote:
A packet capture revealed a number of anomalies. Once the server starts
trying to join the
Another idea could be giving 7.x a shot as it has newer version of PF IIRC.
That's on the list of things to try, but upgrading will probably be painful,
so I'm hoping to find something else first.
Something else you might want to try is to find/install the new PF from
source, if you
Hello
My goal is to authenticate my Cyrus Imapd users against Windos 2003
Active Directory with Kerberos . I have the following setup:
Kerberos5 client
===
FreeBSD acsvfbsd06.domain.tld 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE
/etc/krb.conf:
[libdefaults]
default_realm = domain.tld
Has anyone used Windows 2008 and active directory with a bridging, NATing
firewall between the domain controller and the 2008 machine?
We're in a situation where we're trying to join a domain with a 2008
machine, and no matter what we do to the firewall, joining stalls and fails.
DC: Windows
Has anyone used Windows 2008 and active directory with a bridging,
NATing
firewall between the domain controller and the 2008 machine?
We're in a situation where we're trying to join a domain with a 2008
machine, and no matter what we do to the firewall, joining stalls
and fails.
Haven't used
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Reko Turja reko.tu...@liukuma.net wrote:
Has anyone used Windows 2008 and active directory with a bridging, NATing
firewall between the domain controller and the 2008 machine?
We're in a situation where we're trying to join a domain with a 2008
machine, and no
Do you happen to have contact information for this team?
Sadly no, I just reported the perceived bug via Vista beta bug
reporting - can't remember if that was from the OS itself or from the
web, and got pretty fast reply and tech savvy responder from there.
-Reko
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 04:15:02PM -0500, michael wrote:
after reading all these posts, i've still come up with this answer after
looking ..
freebsd - the power to serve
the motto isn't the power to serve and run Far Cry
That's about the weakest damned argument I've seen in a long time.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:35:33PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
because linux got exactly that way and it sucks now.
That's not what I'd call a productive response, nor is it well supported.
what kind of productivity to you request from such topic. it doesn't have
to be productive.
Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:07:45AM -0800, prad wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:11:48 -0700
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
I don't recall anyone saying I'm with such-and-such a FreeBSD
development team, and these are the reasons we aren't going to do
anything
because linux got exactly that way and it sucks now.
That's not what I'd call a productive response, nor is it well supported.
what kind of productivity to you request from such topic. it doesn't have
to be productive. it's just fact.
___
I'm not sure where this issue should go, or if it's even a bug. If it's
not, please help!
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5468
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
of the docs are also out of sync. I
have found samba as a slave ad works ok.
-Derek
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Hi all,
I have FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25 authenticating successfully against
active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via
FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to
set group permissions using the syntax of
Hi all,
I have FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25 authenticating successfully against
active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via
FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to
set group permissions using the syntax of
jhatfield
id: jhatfield: no such user
If anyone has experience of pointing FreeBSD at an SFU/AD NIS server
I'd like to know if they had this problem and if so how it was solved.
I really want to move to the AD NIS so if I have to I'll replace the
machine with one running FreeBSD 6, but I'd prefer
Hello!
I need to connect my laptop to the wireless NIC on my FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE
gateway.
It's ral0, and I've set it to ad-hoc mode. My laptop, running Windows XP, can
see
the network bsd but not ping it / connect to it.
I used some ascii2hex converter that I found online to turn the wep key
I used some ascii2hex converter that I found online to turn the wep key
1n4te
into 316E3474410D0B.
From ifconfig(8) manual page (my emphasis):
wepkey key|index:key
Set the selected WEP key. If an index is not given, key 1 is
set. A WEP key will be either 5 or
pam_winbind to let me log on to the console using an AD account.
Most of the Samba docs seems to be Linux-specific and the sample
pam files don't match the ones in the FBSD 6 system.
What I did was to edit /etc/pam.d/login:
add auth sufficient pam_winbind.so as the
penultimate line of the auth
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Hatfield
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:33 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Correct configuration of pam_winbind.so for login
using AD accounts
I'm using a newly-installed
Hi all,
I've been trying to build Samba 3.0.14a for 2 days now. I have exhausted
all of the resources I could find to help resolve this issue but to no
avail. I am currently trying to attach my Samba server running FreeBSD 5.3
to a functioning Windows Server 2003 domain. I have installed the
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Kobb
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 12:42 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Samba 3.0.14a with AD Support
Timothy Radigan wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to build Samba 3.0.14a for 2 days now. I have exhausted
all of the resources
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Kobb
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 12:42 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Samba 3.0.14a with AD Support
Timothy Radigan wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to build Samba 3.0.14a for 2 days now. I have exhausted
all
, but I think the base system has all the kerberos
software you need to build samba already installed. I have a few 5.3
systems, and all of them built samba and joined an AD Windows 2000
domain no problem.
If you don't need MIT kerberos or something else I am missing, I would
try uninstalling
Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
since i updated the ports/src/kernel 2 days ago i have had the followings
error splague me .. are these related or am i looking at hdd failure ?
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=1519103
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA
since i updated the ports/src/kernel 2 days ago i have had the followings
error splague me .. are these related or am i looking at hdd failure ?
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=1519103
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5266559
Ad-Aware is designed to provide advanced protection from known
Data-mining, aggressive advertising, Parasites, Scumware, selected
traditional Trojans, Dialers, Malware, Browser hijackers, and tracking
components. With the release of Ad-Aware SE Personal edition, Lavasoft
takes
Hi,
has someone a solution for the following geometry problem with
IDE disks on a raid controller?
When activating the raid (RAID1) the system sees a different geometry
on ar1 than it saw on ad5 and thus finds no filesystems.
System is FBSD5.2R, EPoX 4GEA+, HPT372N, 2*77GB HDS + 2*114GB Maxtor.
Dear Site Manager,
I run several coupon sites and I am interested in advertising one or more of them, on
your site.
To be more specific, I am interested in placing a visible text link (not a banner or
any sort of
PPC/CPM method - only plain text) on your home page and throughout the total
I seek a good system (or systems) for filtering out mail spam, email
viruses, and web pop-up ads and such at our FreeBSD Internet gateway.
I run FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE at this site, and all users behind the
FreeBSD gateway run various versions of Windows and mailers (Outlook,
Outlook Express, and an
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:05:43PM -0400, Doug Lee wrote:
I seek a good system (or systems) for filtering out mail spam, email
viruses, and web pop-up ads and such at our FreeBSD Internet gateway.
For adverts I run Squid with adzap (in the ports). I find it pretty
good, although I find the
Oops, I meant to mention I use sendmail for my MTA but sometimes
consider switching to Postfix for ease of maintenance.
Leaving the rest of this message here for anyone reading last-first;
sorry for top-quoting...
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 08:10:11PM +0100, lewiz wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 03:16:46PM -0400, Doug Lee wrote:
Oops, I meant to mention I use sendmail for my MTA but sometimes
consider switching to Postfix for ease of maintenance.
Well, MailScanner works well with Sendmail. You run two copies (one in,
one out) -- in fact, that's how Postfix runs
Hello, Core-Team!
As shortly said in ${SUBJECT}, there is a question.
In 5.1 Release thereis a situation:
# whoami
root
# dd if=/dev/ad0 of=sect0_copy count=1
..it is ok
# dd if=sect0_copy of=/dev/ad0
dd: /dev/ad0: Operation not permitted
# rm -rf /? :)
What
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 05:04:32AM +0300 or thereabouts, kAlunya seemed to write:
Hello, Core-Team!
This is the freebsd-questions mailing list.
As shortly said in ${SUBJECT}, there is a question.
In 5.1 Release thereis a situation:
# whoami
root
# dd if=/dev/ad0 of=sect0_copy count=1
12:18 PM
Subject: Re: ad-hoc wireless mode and ticks (fwd)
Hope Greg won't mind we still discuss here.
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Jason Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 08:10:18PM -0800, Kan Cai wrote:
But when I set the option mediaopt ibss, I cannot set it back to the
AP
mode
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:20:25AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eko Suwarsono [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: May be help,
:
: http://www.live.com/wireless/unix-base-station.html
:
: and a little explanation you can read at,
:
:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Inquiring minds will ask soon anyway: what rev is 'new enough' ?
wi man page says:
Lucent cards prior to firmware version 6.0.4 do not support IBSS mode.
but the source code says:
if
Suwarsono
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: ad-hoc wireless mode
Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: ad-hoc wireless mode and ticks (fwd)
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eko Suwarsono [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tuesday, 4 March 2003 at 7:18:02 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, this is very confusing. I've been asking the maintainer to
change the terminology, but he points out that the other BSDs do it
this
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:Feel a little confused with the ad-hoc mode set by wicontrol -p
: 3, is it Lucent ad-hoc mode instead of the standard IEEE ad-hoc
: mode (IBSS).
:
: Correct. It's generally called demo ad-hoc mode.
-p
]
Port type (1=BSS, 3=ad-hoc):[ 4 ]
MAC address:[ 00:02:2d:8d:a9:a0 ]
TX rate (selection):[ 3 ]
TX rate (actual speed): [ 11 ]
RTS/CTS handshake threshold:[ 2347 ]
Create IBSS:[ Off
as an reply to a different thread?
Hi, All:
Feel a little confused with the ad-hoc mode set by wicontrol -p
3, is it Lucent ad-hoc mode instead of the standard IEEE ad-hoc
mode (IBSS).
Correct. It's generally called demo ad-hoc mode.
After I use -p 3 option, it cannot talk to Linux/Windows
Thanks for reply.
But if I set it to -p 4, it can do the job. However, I cannot find
this option in wicontrol man page or anywhere. Could somebody
explain me what's going on here?
I don't know a -p 4. I set ad-hoc (i.e. IBSS) mode with -p 1 (in
other words, exactly the same way
Hi, All:
Feel a little confused with the ad-hoc mode set by wicontrol -p 3, is
it Lucent ad-hoc mode instead of the standard IEEE ad-hoc mode (IBSS).
After I use -p 3 option, it cannot talk to Linux/Windows ad-hoc
wireless station. But if I set it to -p 4, it can do the job. However, I
81 matches
Mail list logo
