Re: amarok doesn't support id3v2?

2011-08-21 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Saturday 20 August 2011 22:31:18 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:10:01 -0500 Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote: On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:22:28 +0200 Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote: I suspect taglib uses id3v2.4 whereas id3lib (used by id3v2 port) only

Re: amarok doesn't support id3v2?

2011-08-20 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Wednesday 17 August 2011 07:49:13 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: I made a rather startling discovery tonight while playing with amarok 1.4.10 and the id3v2 port. It seems that if I modify an MP3 files's id3 tags in amarok, it deletes any existing id3v2 tags, leaving only id3v1 tags on the file

Re: amarok doesn't support id3v2?

2011-08-20 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:22:28 +0200 Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote: On Wednesday 17 August 2011 07:49:13 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: I made a rather startling discovery tonight while playing with amarok 1.4.10 and the id3v2 port. It seems that if I modify an MP3 files's id3 tags in

Re: amarok doesn't support id3v2?

2011-08-20 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:10:01 -0500 Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote: On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:22:28 +0200 Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote: I suspect taglib uses id3v2.4 whereas id3lib (used by id3v2 port) only supports id3v2.3. Ah, interesting. Hadn't considered such a

amarok doesn't support id3v2?

2011-08-16 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
I made a rather startling discovery tonight while playing with amarok 1.4.10 and the id3v2 port. It seems that if I modify an MP3 files's id3 tags in amarok, it deletes any existing id3v2 tags, leaving only id3v1 tags on the file (as verified with the id3v2 command line tool). This just seems