On Saturday 20 August 2011 22:31:18 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:10:01 -0500
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:22:28 +0200
Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote:
I suspect taglib uses id3v2.4 whereas id3lib (used by id3v2 port)
only
On Wednesday 17 August 2011 07:49:13 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
I made a rather startling discovery tonight while playing with amarok
1.4.10 and the id3v2 port. It seems that if I modify an MP3 files's
id3 tags in amarok, it deletes any existing id3v2 tags, leaving only
id3v1 tags on the file
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:22:28 +0200
Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote:
On Wednesday 17 August 2011 07:49:13 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
I made a rather startling discovery tonight while playing with
amarok 1.4.10 and the id3v2 port. It seems that if I modify an MP3
files's id3 tags in
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:10:01 -0500
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:22:28 +0200
Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote:
I suspect taglib uses id3v2.4 whereas id3lib (used by id3v2 port)
only supports id3v2.3.
Ah, interesting. Hadn't considered such a
I made a rather startling discovery tonight while playing with amarok
1.4.10 and the id3v2 port. It seems that if I modify an MP3 files's
id3 tags in amarok, it deletes any existing id3v2 tags, leaving only
id3v1 tags on the file (as verified with the id3v2 command line tool).
This just seems