Re: apache22 + php5 (package not ports) ~ spawn-fcgi ?

2012-02-22 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 22/02/2012 05:13, alexus wrote: thank you for your respond - that's my plan b i'd like to know if i can exercise my plan a first: i already have installed apache22, php5 as package (pkg_add) without having them build through /usr/ports (i know how everyone likes ports around here). i want

Re: apache22 + php5 (package not ports) ~ spawn-fcgi ?

2012-02-21 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Feb 21, 2012, at 5:14 PM, alexus wrote: is there a way to make apache22 w/ php5 without using /usr/ports? Yes, you could download and build the sources yourself without using ports. It wouldn't be any faster or easier, though. just using pkg_add -r apache22 pkg_add -r php5 No. The

Re: apache22 + php5 (package not ports) ~ spawn-fcgi ?

2012-02-21 Thread alexus
I dont think you really grasping what I was asking.. I am aware that I can build from source, yet I'm trying to stay away from that route due to a lot of overhead going forward... I'm also aware that php5 or actually apache22 doesn't come with mod_php as well, and as alternative I'm willing to go

Re: apache22 + php5 (package not ports) ~ spawn-fcgi ?

2012-02-21 Thread Michael Powell
alexus wrote: I dont think you really grasping what I was asking.. I am aware that I can build from source, yet I'm trying to stay away from that route due to a lot of overhead going forward... I'm also aware that php5 or actually apache22 doesn't come with mod_php as well, and as

Re: apache22 + php5 (package not ports) ~ spawn-fcgi ?

2012-02-21 Thread alexus
thank you for your respond - that's my plan b i'd like to know if i can exercise my plan a first: i already have installed apache22, php5 as package (pkg_add) without having them build through /usr/ports (i know how everyone likes ports around here). i want to see if it's possible to have a link

Re: apache22 + php5 (package not ports) ~ spawn-fcgi ?

2012-02-21 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Feb 21, 2012, at 5:31 PM, alexus wrote: I dont think you really grasping what I was asking.. With respect, of course I understand what you were asking. I am aware that I can build from source, yet I'm trying to stay away from that route due to a lot of overhead going forward... OK. You