http://tobi.oetiker.ch/lshort/lshort-5.01.src.tar.gz
ran gmake and I see the errors.
One error is that in src/ folder, the file lshort-letter.tex does not
exist :(, if we cd to that folder and copy the lshort-a5.tex
lshort-letter.tex then it will build provided most of the other
@all
I notice that some of the packages that *are* missing have different
names, for instance
pdfnup is available on FreeBSD ports - /usr/ports/print/pdfjam/
psnup is available on FreeBSD ports - /usr/ports/print/psutils-letter/
These are automagically installed if one installs TeXLive full
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:00:25PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
I have been using TeX for a while and I have never had to set up
anthing like this :( I had used MikTeX in winblow$ and TeTeX in linux
distros and FreeBSD 5.3/FreeBSD6.2, and I had never had to mess with
TDS.
I know, this is
If you are using TeXLive, first check if a TeXLive package for what you want
exists. First tell tlmgr(1) to use a CTAN mirror:
tlmgr option repository http://mirror.ctan.org/systems/texlive/tlnet
Then list all packages available:
tlmgr list|less
The packages you have installed are
http://pastebin.com/23RCus2a
http://tobi.oetiker.ch/lshort/lshort-5.01.src.tar.gz
ran gmake and I see the errors.
One error is that in src/ folder, the file lshort-letter.tex does not
exist :(, if we cd to that folder and copy the lshort-a5.tex
lshort-letter.tex then it will build provided
If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
please send me the details. I'm keen to patch
teTeX as far as possible with no major
changes to TDS, i.e. just adding or updating
a package.
--
Anton et all,
The famous lshort by Tobias Oetiker fails to compile with TeTeX
freebsd
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:22:46PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Here's another book with source code, and even with full texlive can't
get it to compile properly :(
http://www.mecmath.net/trig/
This took some time. I had to update nomencl:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:22:46PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Here's another book with source code, and even with full texlive can't
get it to compile properly :(
http://www.mecmath.net/trig/
This took some
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 03:38:09PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:22:46PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Here's another book with source code, and even with full texlive can't
get it
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:41:13PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
|-libraries
|---math
|---systemlayer
|---utilities
|-phaistos
|-shadethm
|---plain
|-pgf
|---basiclayer
|---frontendlayer
|---math
Which is this directory?
I assumed you know.
If you've got the full teTeX installation,
start with
% texdoc tds
tds (TDS) stands for Tex Directory Structure.
This is a sort of a standard on how tex
tree should be organised. teTeX tree
adheres to TDS convention.
texdoc(1) is
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:00:25PM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
I have been using TeX for a while and I have never had to set up
anthing like this :( I had used MikTeX in winblow$ and TeTeX in linux
distros and FreeBSD 5.3/FreeBSD6.2, and I had never had to mess with
TDS.
This is what I
Anton et all,
I have found another book diffyqs that does not compile with default
teTeX, but does with TeXLive:
Book is found here:
http://www.jirka.org/diffyqs/
Source is here:
http://www.jirka.org/diffyqs/diffyqs.tar.gz
I create build script:
/*** build script **/
Anton et all,
hrs@ has been most speedy and helpful. He added
print/latex-chapterfolder
print/tex-mfpic
With these 2 new ports + teTeX I can build this book
fully, no errors. Check it out.
If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
please send me the details. I'm keen to
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:33:45AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
2009 release when FreeBSD
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:19:13 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
please send me the details. I'm keen to patch
teTeX as far as possible with no major
changes to TDS, i.e. just adding or updating
a package.
If TeXlive is (or becomes) the
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:19:13 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
please send me the details. I'm keen to patch
teTeX as far as possible with no major
changes to TDS, i.e. just
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:19:13 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
If you know of another tex project where teTeX fails,
please send me the details. I'm keen to patch
teTeX as far as possible with no major
changes to TDS, i.e. just
Yes, I'm aware of this, but texlive
is not an option for me, unless and
until it appears in the port tree.
But I'm also aware of the step up
or shut up reality, so I shut up.
As Frank pointed out, It's common to have more than one TeX distribution
installed. I have had TeTex and TeXlive
Hello,
I've not really followed this message but I ran (nearly) into the same problem.
I also need latex! But I don't want to use tetex because I am used to texlive.
So, I downloaded the texlive ISO Image and installed it with the included
script:
http://www.tug.org/texlive/acquire-iso.html
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
can install from TeXLive DVD, or go get a DVD with packages:
I would second that. It comes comlete with FreeBSD binaries for i386 and
amd64 in the
I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
2009 release when FreeBSD binaries were not included but now they are the
installation is headache-free.
What exactly is missing from teTeX?
Try this, get the source for
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:33:45AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
2009 release when FreeBSD binaries were not included but now they are the
installation is
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:33:45AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
2009 release when FreeBSD
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 05:54:26PM +, Antonio Olivares wrote:
[snip]
Anton,
This is what I mean. For regular things, TeTeX is fine, but for
bigger projects one can't do without texlive. I encountered the same
problems with default tetex, but installed TeXLive from DVD and I no
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:03:24AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
can install from TeXLive DVD, or go get a DVD with packages:
I would second
Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 05:54:26PM +, Antonio Olivares wrote:
... For regular things, TeTeX is fine, but for bigger projects
one can't do without texlive. I encountered the same problems
with default tetex, but installed TeXLive from DVD and I no
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:33:45AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote:
I hoped for a true native port for TeXLive
I can't see that it's really necessary. I remember difficulties with the
2009 release when FreeBSD binaries were not included but now they are the
installation is
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:19:13PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:03:24AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
can install from
I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
can install from TeXLive DVD, or go get a DVD with packages:
I would second that. It comes comlete with FreeBSD binaries for i386 and amd64
in the 2010 release and installing it is really easy.
I hoped for a true native
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I would advise you to get TeXLive instead, but that is just me. You
can install from TeXLive DVD, or go get a DVD with packages:
I would second that. It comes comlete with FreeBSD binaries for i386 and
amd64 in the
I've tried to install the teTeX port (for pdflatex, etc.) and keep running into
this error.
I can't seem to find a solution on the web and I could really use the help.
freebsd-82-amd64# uname -a
FreeBSD freebsd-82-amd64.localdomain 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu
Feb 17 02:41:51 UTC
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:53:55PM -0700, Jeff Hamann wrote:
I've tried to install the teTeX port (for pdflatex, etc.) and keep running
into this error.
I can't seem to find a solution on the web and I could really use the help.
freebsd-82-amd64# uname -a
FreeBSD
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Jeff Hamann jeff.d.ham...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tried to install the teTeX port (for pdflatex, etc.) and keep running
into this error.
I can't seem to find a solution on the web and I could really use the help.
freebsd-82-amd64# uname -a
FreeBSD
34 matches
Mail list logo
