Bill Moran wrote:
Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FAT32 wasn't my choice. They needed to be writen to by a linux server
but they want to be able to take these and just plug them into a
windows server if need be. We knew that linux writing ntfs wasn't a
good choice so we decided on FAT32. Is
the system sees the disk:
Jun 24 15:37:30 stewie kernel: umass0: Maxtor OneTouch, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2
Jun 24 15:37:30 stewie kernel: umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED)
Jun 24 15:37:31 stewie kernel: GEOM: create disk da0 dp=0xc2d85050
Jun 24 15:37:31 stewie kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus
- Original Message -
From: Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 4:31 PM
Subject: can't mount 300G USB drive that's FAT32
the system sees the disk:
Jun 24 15:37:30 stewie kernel: umass0: Maxtor OneTouch, rev 2.00/2.00,
addr 2
Jun 24 15:37:30
[I copied Tom on this because I know he was working on FAT filesystem
code at some point ... Don't know if he's still trying to do anything
there or not.]
Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the system sees the disk:
Jun 24 15:37:30 stewie kernel: umass0: Maxtor OneTouch, rev 2.00/2.00, addr 2
On Friday 25 June 2004 02:11 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
[I copied Tom on this because I know he was working on FAT filesystem
code at some point ... Don't know if he's still trying to do anything
there or not.]
Dan Finn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the system sees the disk:
Jun 24 15:37:30 stewie
FAT32 wasn't my choice. They needed to be writen to by a linux server
but they want to be able to take these and just plug them into a
windows server if need be. We knew that linux writing ntfs wasn't a
good choice so we decided on FAT32. Is there a better solution?
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004
On Friday 25 June 2004 02:26 pm, Dan Finn wrote:
FAT32 wasn't my choice. They needed to be writen to by a linux
server but they want to be able to take these and just plug them into
a windows server if need be. We knew that linux writing ntfs wasn't
a good choice so we decided on FAT32. Is
