free...@edvax.de wrote:
If you are interested in the bleeding edge of FreeBSD's development,
you follow RELENG_7. This will then deliver the -CURRENT branch to you
with all modifications. It may happen that a -CURRENT of today doesn't
compile, but tomorrow, it will do. It's considered to be
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:32 PM, b. f.bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
He has _7_2_0_RELEASE, not RELENG_7_0_2_RELEASE.
Well, neither actually. :) s/0_2/2_0/ . But I inferred from the
context -- it seemed obvious, particularly from what he wrote later
-- that he meant those choices as
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:32 PM, b. f.bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
He has _7_2_0_RELEASE, not RELENG_7_0_2_RELEASE.
Well, neither actually. :) s/0_2/2_0/ . But I inferred from the
context -- it seemed obvious, particularly from what he wrote later
-- that he meant those choices as
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:00:09 +0100, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
I took a look at the web pages and found the following choices:
RELENG_7_BP
RELENG_7_2_BP
RELENG_7_2_0_RELEASE
RELENG_7_2
But could not find anything that told me where -p2 fits into this!!
The -p2 is
I am confused about the usage of the tag for src.
I took a look at the web pages and found the following choices:
_7_BP
_7_2_BP
_7_2_0_RELEASE
_7_2
But could not find anything that told me where -p2 fits into this!!
# uname -a
7.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p2 #0: Wed Jun 24 00:14:35 UTC
David Southwell wrote:
I am confused about the usage of the tag for src.
I took a look at the web pages and found the following choices:
_7_BP
_7_2_BP
_7_2_0_RELEASE
_7_2
But could not find anything that told me where -p2 fits into this!!
# uname -a
7.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD
David Southwell wrote:
I am confused about the usage of the tag for src.
I took a look at the web pages and found the following choices:
_7_BP
_7_2_BP
_7_2_0_RELEASE
_7_2
But could not find anything that told me where -p2 fits into this!!
# uname -a
7.2-RELEASE-p2
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:43 PM, David Southwellda...@vizion2000.net wrote:
I am confused about the usage of the tag for src.
I took a look at the web pages and found the following choices:
_7_BP
_7_2_BP
BP ?
_7_2_0_RELEASE
Should be RELENG. Don't blindly follow how-tos.
_7_2
But
Glen Barber glen.j.barber at gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:43 PM, David Southwelldavid at vizion2000.net wrote:
I am confused about the usage of the tag for src.
I took a look at the web pages and found the following choices:
_7_BP
_7_2_BP
BP ?
It is the branchpoint tag, made
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:54 PM, b. f.bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
Glen Barber glen.j.barber at gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:43 PM, David Southwelldavid at vizion2000.net
wrote:
I am confused about the usage of the tag for src.
I took a look at the web pages and found the
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:07:20PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:43 PM, David Southwellda...@vizion2000.net wrote:
I am confused about the usage of the tag for src.
I took a look at the web pages and found the following choices:
_7_BP
_7_2_BP
BP ?
BP = Branch
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 12:52:54 Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:07:20PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:43 PM, David Southwellda...@vizion2000.net
wrote:
I am confused about the usage of the tag for src.
I took a look at the web pages and found
On 8/4/09, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
_7_2_0_RELEASE
Should be RELENG. Don't blindly follow how-tos.
RELENG_7_2_0_RELEASE is a valid tag. Don't make pronouncements if you
haven't verified them.
He has _7_2_0_RELEASE, not RELENG_7_0_2_RELEASE.
Well, neither actually.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:32 PM, b. f.bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
He has _7_2_0_RELEASE, not RELENG_7_0_2_RELEASE.
Well, neither actually. :) s/0_2/2_0/ . But I inferred from the
context -- it seemed obvious, particularly from what he wrote later
-- that he meant those choices as
14 matches
Mail list logo
