At 17:12 21/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
filezilla, winscp,
FTP and NFSv3 both have
On 7/22/2011 1:50 PM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 17:12 21/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:06:23PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 7/22/2011 1:50 PM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 17:12 21/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
On 7/22/2011 3:08 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Basically the same. I don't think it's disk.
Are you able to saturate the ethernet ? Try something like
/usr/src/tools/tools/netrate/netblast/netblast
on the local ethernet and see if you can generate and receive a full
gigabit on the wire
On 7/22/2011 3:08 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Basically the same. I don't think it's disk.
Are you able to saturate the ethernet ? Try something like
/usr/src/tools/tools/netrate/netblast/netblast
on the local ethernet and see if you can generate and receive a full
gigabit on the wire
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:46:06PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 7/22/2011 3:08 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Basically the same. I don't think it's disk.
Are you able to saturate the ethernet ? Try something like
/usr/src/tools/tools/netrate/netblast/netblast
on the local
On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
3.65 419155.4
Thats 400Mb/s no ? Whats the CPU in this thing ? Also your NIC version
was 7.1.9. RELENG_8 has 7.2.3. Can you try that version if possible ?
So no, I'm not saturating this network. Not even close. I have a
machine with a
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:15:11PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
3.65 419155.4
Thats 400Mb/s no ? Whats the CPU in this thing ? Also your NIC version
was 7.1.9. RELENG_8 has 7.2.3. Can you try that version if possible ?
facepalm I sit
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Michael W. Lucas
mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:15:11PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 7/22/2011 4:10 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Will applications such as NFS cut bandwith usage that much?
I have seen similar performance
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:19:47PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 7/20/2011 12:04 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Hi,
I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel. When using FTP
or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
network, no errors showing.
what
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:32:27PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 21:16 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
It's at gigabit:
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
options=219bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL_MAGIC
Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
filezilla, winscp,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
Have you tried other protocols? Http, rsync... It maybe a problem at
client side, some ftp clients can set a maximun ftp transfer, like
filezilla, winscp,
FTP and NFSv3 both have similar results.
==ml
--
Michael W. Lucas
...@pluto.rain.com
Sent: 21/07/2011 13:05:54
To: nec...@retena.com
Cc: questi...@freebsd.org; mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org
Subject: Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64?
Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com wrote:
If it's not connected at 1 gigabit or not full duplex you can
force it with ifconfig
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:31:25 +
Peter Harrison articulated:
Sorry for top posting. My 'phone makes it awkward.
I use ndis for the wifi connection in my netbook. Was trivial to
convert the Windows driver, and it works without issue.
Anyone know whether it could do 'N' class devices, to
Hi,
I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel. When using FTP
or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
network, no errors showing.
It looks a lot like kern/152828, but it seems that nobody's looking at
that.
As per suggestions from the archives, I've tried
At 18:04 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Hi,
I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel. When using FTP
or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
network, no errors showing.
It looks a lot like kern/152828, but it seems that nobody's looking at
that.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 07:12:27PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 18:04 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Hi,
I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel. When using FTP
or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
network, no errors showing.
It looks a
At 21:16 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
It's at gigabit:
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
options=219bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL_MAGIC
ether 00:15:17:31:c8:fe
inet xxx
media: Ethernet
On 7/20/2011 12:04 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
Hi,
I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel. When using FTP
or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
network, no errors showing.
what does
sysctl -a dev.em
show ?
What kind of switch is the box plugged
Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com wrote:
If it's not connected at 1 gigabit or not full duplex you can
force it with ifconfig. If there are too much errors check the
cable.
Last I heard, this does _not_ work with gigabit unless you can
force-configure both ends of the link. The negotiation
21 matches
Mail list logo
