--As of February 9, 2012 6:36:00 AM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com is alleged
to have said:
TWiki is a nightmare to update ...
TWiki was replaced with Foswiki (which is also in ports) at $WORK
a while back. Dunno why, or how much of a job the changeover was
for the admins, but there must have
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:54 PM, mikel king mikel.k...@olivent.com wrote:
Unfortunately, WP isn't exactly a well designed CMS form the untaring
standpoint.
Most aren't. TWiki is a nightmare to update, basically requiring you
to copy your old content to a new install and then hand-merge the new
David Brodbeck g...@gull.us wrote:
TWiki is a nightmare to update ...
TWiki was replaced with Foswiki (which is also in ports) at $WORK
a while back. Dunno why, or how much of a job the changeover was
for the admins, but there must have been some expected benefit to
justify the effort. The
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, dick d...@nagual.nl wrote:
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system. That
may be true for the core files, but what about ports.
On the net I read _never_ to let the webserver be the owner of its files and
yet, ports like Drupal or
On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:15 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, dick d...@nagual.nl wrote:
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system. That
may be true for the core files, but what about ports.
On the net I read _never_ to let the webserver be the
--As of February 7, 2012 5:59:27 PM -0500, mikel king is alleged to have
said:
On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:15 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, dick d...@nagual.nl wrote:
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system.
That may be true for the core
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 7, 2012 5:59:27 PM -0500, mikel king is alleged to have said:
On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:15 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, dick d...@nagual.nl wrote:
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system.
That may be true for the core files, but what about ports.
On the net I read _never_ to let the webserver be the owner of its files
and yet, ports like Drupal or WordPress make the files rwx for the owner
(www) as well as
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:37:17 -0600, d...@nagual.nl wrote:
I'm a bit confused. I always believed FreeBSD is a very safe system.
That may be true for the core files, but what about ports.
On the net I read _never_ to let the webserver be the owner of its
files and yet, ports like Drupal or
