Removing firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 from system

2009-08-26 Thread Jerry
firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 Information for firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1: Required by: gegl-0.0.22_6 gimp-2.6.6,2 gimp-app-2.6.6_3,1 gimp-gutenprint-5.1.7_2 gimp-help-2.4.2_1 librsvg2-2.26.0_1 I am not sure why these programs require Firefox-2 since Firefox-3.5 was installed prior to their installation

Re: Removing firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 from system

2009-08-26 Thread George Liaskos
. /var/db/pkg $ pkg_info -R firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 Information for firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1: Required by: gegl-0.0.22_6 gimp-2.6.6,2 gimp-app-2.6.6_3,1 gimp-gutenprint-5.1.7_2 gimp-help-2.4.2_1 librsvg2-2.26.0_1 I am not sure why these programs require Firefox-2 since Firefox-3.5 was installed

Re: Removing firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 from system

2009-08-26 Thread Lowell Gilbert
by these programs. /var/db/pkg $ pkg_info -R firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 Information for firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1: Required by: gegl-0.0.22_6 gimp-2.6.6,2 gimp-app-2.6.6_3,1 gimp-gutenprint-5.1.7_2 gimp-help-2.4.2_1 librsvg2-2.26.0_1 I am not sure why these programs require Firefox-2 since Firefox-3.5

Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-21 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org writes: Howard Goldstein h...@queue.to writes: It's like the cat dragged in firefox2 despite use of 3.5 for actual browsing :( Is there a good way to resolve these dependencies through firefox3 or 3.5 short of ditching gnome? Yeah,

Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-20 Thread Howard Goldstein
ajtiM wrote: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 Paul Schmehl pschmehl_lists at tx.rr.com Thu Aug 13 02:16:24 UTC 2009 Previous message: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 Next message: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] --On August 12, 2009 8:18:55 PM -0500 ajtiM

Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-20 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Howard Goldstein h...@queue.to writes: It's like the cat dragged in firefox2 despite use of 3.5 for actual browsing :( Is there a good way to resolve these dependencies through firefox3 or 3.5 short of ditching gnome? Yeah, it's really from the gecko handling. According to Mk/bsd.gecko.mk,

firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-12 Thread ajtiM
Hi! When I run ; portaudit -a Affected package: firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/49e8f2ee-8147-11de-a994-0030843d3802.html but when I check above site I found: Affects: firefox 3.*,1 firefox 3.*,1 3.0.13,1

Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-12 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On August 12, 2009 8:18:55 PM -0500 ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! When I run ; portaudit -a Affected package: firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/49e8f2ee-8147-11de-a994-0030843d3802.html but when I check

Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-12 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 12 August 2009 18:16:20 Paul Schmehl wrote: --On August 12, 2009 8:18:55 PM -0500 ajtiM lum...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! When I run ; portaudit -a Affected package: firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. Reference: http

Re: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1

2009-08-12 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On August 12, 2009 9:48:04 PM -0500 Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote: Given the above, it should be affected. Reading the original documents it doesn't show. And I can't find anywhere that firefox 2 is End of Life. Firefox was EOL in December 2008. No security