foo

2012-05-23 Thread Robert Bonomi
From bonomi Wed May 23 03:14:43 2012 Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 03:14:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem mailer-dae...@mail.r-bonomi.com To: r...@mail.r-bonomi.com Subject: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details This is a MIME-encapsulated message

Re: foo

2012-05-23 Thread Michael Powell
Robert Bonomi wrote: From bonomi Wed May 23 03:14:43 2012 Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 03:14:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem mailer-dae...@mail.r-bonomi.com To: r...@mail.r-bonomi.com Subject: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details This is a MIME-encapsulated message

Re: Anything like mkmf for foo linux?

2011-11-03 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 04:38:00AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 04:38:00 +0100 From: Polytropon free...@edvax.de Subject: Re: Anything like mkmf for foo linux? To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1

Anything like mkmf for foo linux?

2011-11-02 Thread Gary Kline
i asked the seattle linux group and the mkmf they have on/for ubuntu was fine. not by me. i started to port our mkmf which is non-trivial at best. so:: are there any other kinds of makefile creators in ports that i can use on my FBSD server AND SEE IF UBUNTU HAS A SIMILAR PACKAGE? fwiw,i HAVE

Re: Anything like mkmf for foo linux?

2011-11-02 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:08:41 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: fwiw,i HAVE PORTED A FEW THINGS ACROSS. dunno what id do w/out the src!! Keep the mkmf source -- seems that is has been removed from the ports tree. Port: mkmf-4.11 Path: /usr/ports/devel/mkmf Info: Creates program and library

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-25 Thread Arthur Chance
On 11/25/10 03:01, Gary Kline wrote: Folks (mostly Adam), Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said. Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among the stuff he installed a few years back and now was much better:: ALIX.2D13 system board - $115 CompactFlash card

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-25 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:48:47PM +, Arthur Chance wrote: On 11/25/10 03:01, Gary Kline wrote: Folks (mostly Adam), Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said. Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among the stuff he installed a few years back and now

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-25 Thread Arthur Chance
On 11/25/10 18:22, Gary Kline wrote: [Huge snip] What I don't understand is the CF card and howto install pfSense. I'll re-read wherever I have to but some clues would certainly help. I installed pfSense by CDROM initially and figure this time the install would

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-25 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 07:16:01PM +, Arthur Chance wrote: On 11/25/10 18:22, Gary Kline wrote: [Huge snip] Super :-) What I don't understand is the CF card and howto install pfSense. I'll re-read wherever I have to but some clues would certainly help. I

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread perryh
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. Dunno about having them on-board, but anything with a Poulsbo SCH should have two PCIe channels, each of which could be used for a NIC. ___

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Bruce Cran
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:26:53 -0800 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Dunno about having them on-board, but anything with a Poulsbo SCH should have two PCIe channels, each of which could be used for a NIC. You also get network cards with multiple ports which would work. e.g.

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
On 24.11.2010 02:43, Gary Kline wrote: Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall [pfSense], but nada. Any wizards on this list have a clue?

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Robert Huff
Bruce Cran writes: You also get network cards with multiple ports which would work. e.g. http://reviews.cnet.com/adapters-nics/d-link-dfe-570tx/1707-3380_7-785663.html The machine I'm typing on has a two port Intel Pro/1000-GT; I cannot recommend it highly enough. One

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Goran Lowkrantz
--On November 23, 2010 17:43:12 -0800 Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall [pfSense], but nada. Any wizards

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Arthur Chance
On 11/24/10 01:43, Gary Kline wrote: Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall [pfSense], but nada. Any wizards on this list have a clue? I don't

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:03:56PM +, Arthur Chance wrote: On 11/24/10 01:43, Gary Kline wrote: Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs.  I _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall [pfSense], but nada. Any wizards on

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:23:33PM +0100, Goran Lowkrantz wrote: --On November 23, 2010 17:43:12 -0800 Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I _thought_ I'd found a

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: Anybody? Gary, in case you didn't catch it the pcengines link already given to you is low power setup with comsumption comparable or better than an Atom. It's also been tested with FreeBSD and pfSense according to the

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:14:01PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: Anybody? Gary, in case you didn't catch it the pcengines link already given to you is low power setup with comsumption comparable or better than

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Gary Kline
Folks (mostly Adam), Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said. Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among the stuff he installed a few years back and now was much better:: ALIX.2D13 system board - $115

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: Folks (mostly Adam), Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said. Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among the stuff he installed a few years back and now was much better:: ALIX.2D13

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Matt Emmerton
Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall [pfSense], but nada. Any wizards on this list have a clue? You'd probably have to build one yourself out of

Re: foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-24 Thread Gary Kline
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:45:41PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: Folks (mostly Adam), Hang on a sec. I think I misread what my friend said. Following is a snip of what he said was good; that this was among the stuff

foo; no such thing as a dual-nic atom firewall

2010-11-23 Thread Gary Kline
Maybe someone on-list can help me; after 5+ hours of clicking and typing, I can't find an atom cpu computer with dual NICs. I _thought_ I'd found a computer to replace to Kayak firewall [pfSense], but nada. Any wizards on this list have a clue? -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-17 Thread Matthew Seaman
Tom Worster wrote: On 9/16/09 3:19 PM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Tom Worster wrote: is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? If you're starting service foo, then you

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-17 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote: On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote: On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote: Tom Worster wrote: thanks, Mel, that's good to know. i think your suggestion of

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-17 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:14:29PM +0200, Mel Flynn typed: On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote: On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote: On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote: Tom Worster wrote:

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-17 Thread Mel Flynn
On Thursday 17 September 2009 19:55:33 Ruben de Groot wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 07:14:29PM +0200, Mel Flynn typed: On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:18:03 Tom Worster wrote: On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote: On Wednesday 16

passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-16 Thread Tom Worster
is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it '-o X11Forwarding=no' without touching a config file? tom

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-16 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 18:45:29 Tom Worster wrote: is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? for example, how does one start sshd using /etc/rc.d/sshd and pass it '-o X11Forwarding

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-16 Thread Tom Worster
On 9/16/09 1:35 PM, Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote: On Wednesday 16 September 2009 18:45:29 Tom Worster wrote: is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? for example

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-16 Thread Chris Cowart
Tom Worster wrote: thanks, Mel, that's good to know. i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy solution for me. You could also just put: sshd_flags=-o X11Forwarding=no into your /etc/rc.conf file. Pretty much all of the rc.d scripts support the use of

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-16 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote: Tom Worster wrote: thanks, Mel, that's good to know. i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy solution for me. You could also just put: sshd_flags=-o X11Forwarding=no into your /etc/rc.conf

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-16 Thread Tom Worster
On 9/16/09 2:37 PM, Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote: On Wednesday 16 September 2009 20:21:40 Chris Cowart wrote: Tom Worster wrote: thanks, Mel, that's good to know. i think your suggestion of modifying rc.conf will turn out to be a tidy solution for me.

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
Tom Worster wrote: is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? If you're starting service foo, then you should be able to define command arguments by setting foo_flags=-a -b -c. This is a convention

Re: passing options thru '/etc/rc.d/foo start'

2009-09-16 Thread Tom Worster
On 9/16/09 3:19 PM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Tom Worster wrote: is there a general shell syntax that can be used to pass arguments to a daemon that you're starting with the /etc/rc.d/foo start command? If you're starting service foo, then you should be able

Foo***-lite ?

2007-02-18 Thread Gary Kline
People, I hope there are some kde or gnome wizards around to give me a few clues about tuning my gnome|kde- lite window managers. So far I have the regular gnome2 and KDE3 desktops going on my test box quite well. kde at least gives users the opportunity

Re: Foo***-lite ?

2007-02-18 Thread Nick Withers
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:57:30 -0800 Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People, I hope there are some kde or gnome wizards around to give me a few clues about tuning my gnome|kde- lite window managers. So far I have the regular gnome2 and KDE3 desktops going on my test box

Re: Foo***-lite ?

2007-02-18 Thread Gary Kline
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:36:39AM +1100, Nick Withers wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:57:30 -0800 Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: People, I hope there are some kde or gnome wizards around to give me a few clues about tuning my gnome|kde- lite window managers. So far I

package foo has no origin recorded

2005-08-27 Thread Nikolas Britton
How do I get pkg_info and pkg_delete to stop telling me that my 3rd party app has no origin recorded? I've added the two packages to HOLD_PKGS in pkgtools.conf and put +IGNOREME in the package directories but pkg_delete still bitches every time I do anything with ports/package system.

Re: make world DESTDIR=/foo does not work under 5.3-RELEASE on i386 or amd64

2004-11-17 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Nov 8, 2004, at 3:52 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2004-11-08 15:08, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 8, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: I haven't tried make world in a long time, but I recently installed a clean snapshot of CURRENT using a slightly

make world DESTDIR=/foo still not working under 5.3-STABLE

2004-11-16 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
I can do make buildworld make installworld without the DESTDIR and it works fine but to build a jail I do make world DESTDIR=/foo and I still get the following problem (as do many others it appears). This is under 5.3-STABLE from cvsup on November 16 cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o

Re: make world DESTDIR=/foo does not work under 5.3-RELEASE on i386 or amd64

2004-11-09 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2004-11-08 15:08, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 8, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: I haven't tried make world in a long time, but I recently installed a clean snapshot of CURRENT using a slightly different approach: # cd /usr/src # make

make world DESTDIR=/foo does not work under 5.3-RELEASE on i386 or amd64

2004-11-08 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
make world DESTDIR=/foo or make buildworld DESTDIR=/foo does not work on either my i386 or amd64 systems after a cvsup to 5.3-RELEASE and native build. If you leave off the DESTDIR and build for the running machine, it works fine. And the DESTDIR worked fine under beta7 (and possibly

Re: make world DESTDIR=/foo does not work under 5.3-RELEASE on i386 or amd64

2004-11-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2004-11-08 09:59, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: make world DESTDIR=/foo or make buildworld DESTDIR=/foo does not work on either my i386 or amd64 systems after a cvsup to 5.3-RELEASE and native build. If you leave off the DESTDIR and build for the running machine

Re: make world DESTDIR=/foo does not work under 5.3-RELEASE on i386 or amd64

2004-11-08 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Hi On Nov 8, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2004-11-08 09:59, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: make world DESTDIR=/foo or make buildworld DESTDIR=/foo does not work on either my i386 or amd64 systems after a cvsup to 5.3-RELEASE and native build. If you leave

Re: make world DESTDIR=/foo does not work under 5.3-RELEASE on i386 or amd64

2004-11-08 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Nov 8, 2004, at 10:11 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2004-11-08 09:59, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: make world DESTDIR=/foo or make buildworld DESTDIR=/foo does not work on either my i386 or amd64 systems after a cvsup to 5.3-RELEASE and native build. If you leave

Re: set fnord foo

2002-10-01 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 01), Roman Neuhauser said: yeah, i figured out i made a complete fool of myself after a bit more rtfming and googling (FOLDOC). now if i only knew why oh why is mkinstalldirs written this way. I believe it's a workaround for shells that remove empty `` expressions.

set fnord foo

2002-09-30 Thread Roman Neuhauser
hi there. could anyone tell me what $subject does? i can't find any explanation. man pages for sh(1) (freebsd) and bash(1) (linux) don't mention fnord. what does it do? -- begin 666 nonexistent.vbs FreeBSD 4.7-RC 12:42PM up 12 days, 19:57, 15 users, load averages: 0.02, 0.05, 0.08 end To