can anyone suggest what i'm doing wrong here.
Desired:drop everything from 180.0.0.0 to 180.255.255.255
ipfw -q add 137 deny all from 180.0.0.0/8 to any
nothing wrong. all is fine.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
can anyone suggest what i'm doing wrong here.
Desired:drop everything from 180.0.0.0 to 180.255.255.255
ipfw -q add 137 deny all from 180.0.0.0/8 to any
thanks
Paul.
--
-
Paul Macdonald
IFDNRG Ltd
Web and video hosting
-
t: 0131
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 416, Issue 1, Message: 26
On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:06:12 +0100 Paul Macdonald p...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
can anyone suggest what i'm doing wrong here.
Desired:drop everything from 180.0.0.0 to 180.255.255.255
ipfw -q add 137 deny all from 180.0.0.0/8 to
On 21/05/2012 14:50, Ian Smith wrote:
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 416, Issue 1, Message: 26
On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:06:12 +0100 Paul Macdonaldp...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
can anyone suggest what i'm doing wrong here.
Desired:drop everything from 180.0.0.0 to 180.255.255.255
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Paul Macdonald p...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
A very open firewall test script is as follows:
00010 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00081 deny log ip from 180.0.0.0/8 to any
00100 check-state
You don't need the following
00101 allow tcp from any to any established
On 21/05/2012 16:44, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Paul Macdonaldp...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
A very open firewall test script is as follows:
00010 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00081 deny log ip from 180.0.0.0/8 to any
00100 check-state
You don't need the following
Paul Macdonald wrote:
[snip]
It has been many years since I used IPFW as I moved on to IPFILTER, and then
on to PF which is what I use now. I don't even recall exactly why I chose to
utilize both setting directionality of flow per specific interface. I suspect
that somehow there is some rule
On Mon, 21 May 2012 16:30:59 +0100, Paul Macdonald wrote:
On 21/05/2012 14:50, Ian Smith wrote:
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 416, Issue 1, Message: 26
On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:06:12 +0100 Paul Macdonaldp...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
can anyone suggest what i'm doing wrong here.
On 21/05/2012 17:01, Paul Macdonald wrote:
On 21/05/2012 16:44, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Paul Macdonaldp...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
A very open firewall test script is as follows:
this is now resolved, i hadn't realised (embarrassingly) that ipfw list
will show
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Paul Macdonald p...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
this is now resolved, i hadn't realised (embarrassingly) that ipfw list will
show rules if if the fw is disabled.
You should consider using tables, which allow you to add ad hoc nets,
etc. and you can swap rulesets
10 matches
Mail list logo