On 14/01/2012 18:07, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable=YES in rc.conf, and all
worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES. But now there are still some error
messages at boot time, and ipv6 doesn't seem to work correctly:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, the wise Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Don't use ipv6, but reading above: Did you replace ipv6_enable with
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces? because the error seems to tell you that you
must keep ipv6_enable
I replaced it with the new lines because according to the manpage
On 15/01/2012 21:41, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, the wise Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Don't use ipv6, but reading above: Did you replace ipv6_enable with
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces? because the error seems to tell you that
you must keep ipv6_enable
I replaced it with the new
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, the wise Erik Nørgaard wrote:
Don't use ipv6, but reading above: Did you replace ipv6_enable with
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces? because the error seems to tell you that
you must keep ipv6_enable
I replaced it with the new lines because according to the manpage
ipv6_enable
Hi,
In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable=YES in rc.conf, and all
worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES. But now there are still some error
messages at boot time, and ipv6 doesn't seem to work correctly:
...
root: /etc/rc: WARNING:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 06:07:01PM +0100, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable=YES in rc.conf, and all
worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES. But now there are still some error
messages at boot time, and ipv6
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, the wise Yuri Pankov wrote:
In 8.2 ipv6 was enabled by adding ipv6_enable=YES in rc.conf, and all
worked fine. In FreeBSD 9 that changed to
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces=YES. But now there are still some error
messages at boot time, and ipv6 doesn't seem to work correctly:
gahn wrote:
Thanks Steve:
the router that sending RA is juniper and the protocol router-advertisement
has been activated:
g...@lab_1 show interfaces fe-0/0/3
...
Logical interface fe-0/0/3.170 (Index 70) (SNMP ifIndex 59)
...
Addresses, Flags: Is-Preferred
...@ibctech.ca
Subject: Re: ipv6 and freebsd
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:20 AM
gahn wrote:
Thanks Steve:
the router that sending RA is juniper and the protocol
router-advertisement has been activated:
g
gahn wrote:
Thanks Steve:
We use fec0::... as global unique IPv6 address in the lab environment. the
IPv6 routers in our lab uses fec0:0:5::/64 with eui-64 addressing scheme (for
testing).
From the host lab (freebsd) machine, it clearly sees two link-local
addresses for two IPv6 routers
gahn wrote:
What shall I do to accomplish this on FreeBSD?
For clarification and completeness, here is exactly what I did:
First, config the router (Cisco):
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
ipv6 address 2607:F118:A::1/64
ipv6 address
:
From: Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca
Subject: Re: ipv6 and freebsd
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 6:20 AM
gahn wrote:
Thanks Steve:
the router that sending RA is juniper and the protocol
router
/10/09, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
From: Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca
Subject: Re: ipv6 and freebsd
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 10:35 AM
gahn wrote:
Thanks for the tips.
But i still
gahn wrote:
Ok, i meant the configuration of ipv6_network_interface=fxp0 alone
doesn't seem to be working:
[...]
how could I enable IPv6 only on the interface fxp0 instead of every interface?
It is possible to completely disable IPv6 on an interface, but man (8)
ndp recommends against doing
Thanks for the tips.
But i still only see the fe80::..., link-local address, not the fec0:...
something as I expected.
--- On Tue, 2/10/09, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
From: Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca
Subject: Re: ipv6 and freebsd
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general
gahn wrote:
Thanks for the tips.
But i still only see the fe80::..., link-local address, not the fec0:...
something as I expected.
Provide the output to:
# sysctl -a net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv
# ndp -i fxp0
# ifconfig fxp0
...and, run a tcpdump on fxp0 capturing only IPv6 packets.
Hi all:
Free questions with FreeBSD and IPV6. I am running 7.1.
1) My machine has multiple interfaces and some of interfaces I would like to
run IP v6 but not all of them. How could I do that? Currently
ipv6_enable=YES enables every interface of this machine, and
ipv6_network_interface=fxp0
far i don't see the automatically configured IPv6
address on the interface fxp0 except the link-local address (the one starts
with fe80::). why is that?
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com
Subject: ipv6 and freebsd
To: freebsd general questions
Hello,
I'm having problems with ipfw + IPv6 keep-state rules, if I use a
keep-state rule on IPv6 it will only work intermittently (eg. I can
connect to an FTP site with IPv6 and start to grab a file, but it will
stall after a few seconds). I am using deny all by default on ipfw, my
ruleset
Hello,
I'm having problems with ipfw + IPv6 keep-state rules, if I use a
keep-state rule on IPv6 it will only work intermittently (eg. I can
connect to an FTP site with IPv6 and start to grab a file, but it will
stall after a few seconds). I am using deny all by default on ipfw, my
ruleset
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/6to4-IPv6-problems-FreeBSD-6.2-p4-tf3829352.html#a11275146
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/6to4-IPv6-problems-FreeBSD-6.2-p4-tf3829352.html#a11093482
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
relay was down and it crashed.
Suggestions where I can find this panic report, ..
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/6to4-IPv6-problems-FreeBSD-6.2-p4-tf3829352.html#a11038960
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
:: UGS
stf0
narf#
when this happens it takes about 10 mins and my ssh IPv6 ssh session is
closed, after keeping this up for longer the server crashes, .. any
suggestions ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/6to4-IPv6-problems-FreeBSD-6.2-p4-tf3829352.html
think
a server should crash if its gateway is in trouble, ..
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/6to4-IPv6-problems-FreeBSD-6.2-p4-tf3829352.html#a10841206
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:01:49PM -0700, Ofloo wrote:
Ofloo wrote:
I use 6to4 IPv6 tunnels, when using applications which use a lot of
bandwidth (400kb/s), it is not that much but still, the server gets in
trouble.
May 28 19:51:21 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route
Hello.
I am trying to implement a mobile ipv6 testbed.
May I use any release of freeBSD or I need a specific one?
My email addrs are [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking forward for your answer.
Ioannis Kandirakis
Hi all!
I've been struggling with some problems lately after going from FreeBSD
4.11-STABLE to FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE.
Eggdrop will not listen to tcp4, at any cost. It will only listen to
IPv6 (tcp6), no matter what i do. The same error occurs
with muh, but works fine on psybnc.
Here's an
28 matches
Mail list logo
