On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 03:55:28 pm Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent
On 11/03/2010 06:55 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours
googling around
On 11/03/2010 06:55 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours
googling around
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
Or in Gnome put the system monitor thing on a panel
I used to use vnstat for this on servers
Path:/usr/ports/net/vnstat
Info:A console-based network traffic monitor
If you want to avoid proc, try
net-mgmt/iftop
or
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:55:28AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:55:28AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 07:33:08AM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 11/03/2010 06:55 AM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down is
In the last episode (Nov 03), Gary Kline said:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:55:28AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:54:01AM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote:
Or in Gnome put the system monitor thing on a panel
I used to use vnstat for this on servers
Path:/usr/ports/net/vnstat
Info:A console-based
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:42:06 -0700
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am
_supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL?
If your modem or router has some means of configuring it, typically via
a browser, you can get usually get that
On Tuesday 02 November 2010 03:42:06 Gary Kline wrote:
People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am
_supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL?
You can normally find out what rate the modem has synced to your ISP at - that
should tell you the theoretical maximum raw
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:50:03AM +, RW wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:42:06 -0700
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am
_supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL?
If your modem or router has some means of configuring it,
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours
googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It
occured that I _might_ be geting the full thru-put; that it is
data that is flowing
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours
googling around and trying things. So far, not much. ---It
occured that I _might_ be geting
In the last episode (Nov 02), Gary Kline said:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:44:37AM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 01:17:00 Gary Kline wrote:
The Bps Down is supposed to me 1M. Up is 864Kbps. I spent hours
googling around and trying things. So far, not much.
People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am
_supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL?
tia,
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php
An Open
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am
_supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL?
tia,
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
The 7.90a release
Gary,
Keep in mind that their rate and your rate WILL be different. At least a 10%
difference, due to TCP overhead. So make sure you test on already compressed
data (like an MP3 stream). The more compressed the data the less likely it will
go through protocol compression en route.
--
Ryan
On
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:48:01 -0700, Antonio Olivares
olivares14...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
People, is there a utility to give me the rate of bps that I am
_supposed_ to be getting from my telco DSL?
tia,
gary
--
Gary Kline
19 matches
Mail list logo
