Martin Cracauer wrote:
Right now I think there's a general lack of people building CMUCL
binaries, BTW.
There are recent cmucl binaries built here:
http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/snapshots/2009/01/
for freebsd 7 and freebsd 8.
I think this is for x86, not x86-64 but they should
Michel Talon wrote on Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:34:33AM +0200:
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Right now I think there's a general lack of people building CMUCL
binaries, BTW.
There are recent cmucl binaries built here:
http://common-lisp.net/project/cmucl/downloads/snapshots/2009/01/
for
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Interesting you have lower performance in SBCL. Are you comparing a
64 bit SBCL with a 32 bit CMUCL? Is your SBCL binary (whichever
bitcount) compiled with thread support?
I have a 32 bits machine, and i was using the FreeBSD sbcl port without
changing any compiling
Douglas Thrift wrote on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:27:25PM -0700:
Hello,
I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should
actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while
back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug
for this:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Douglas Thrift douglas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should
actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while
back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug
Hello,
I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should
actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while
back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug
for this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146680
Hope this
Hello Martin, *,
the port lang/cmucl has a dependency on a very old libutil,
libc and libm:
% lisp
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libutil.so.5 not found, required by lisp
% which lisp
/usr/local/bin/lisp
% ldd `which lisp`
/usr/local/bin/lisp:
libutil.so.5 = not found (0x0)
