Re: make run-depends-list-recursive?

2009-04-16 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 01:14:23 Chris Whitehouse wrote: Mel Flynn wrote: On Monday 13 April 2009 03:56:15 Tim Judd wrote: On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.comwrote: Hi Is there a make target which will give a list of _all_ dependencies recursively

Re: make run-depends-list-recursive?

2009-04-16 Thread Mel Flynn
On Wednesday 15 April 2009 09:26:11 Jonathan McKeown wrote: On Tuesday 14 April 2009 21:02:08 Mel Flynn wrote: On Monday 13 April 2009 03:56:15 Tim Judd wrote: make all-depends-list Two things: 1) It surpresses config target and if a port has OPTIONS set, then you may get surprised

Re: make run-depends-list-recursive?

2009-04-16 Thread Jonathan McKeown
On Thursday 16 April 2009 12:27:04 Mel Flynn wrote: But yes, all-depends-list is exactly that, with the provision that it does not take changed OPTIONS into account. That's what I suspected you were saying yesterday, and it seems to be wrong. Try this (assuming you haven't already

Re: make run-depends-list-recursive?

2009-04-16 Thread Mel Flynn
On Thursday 16 April 2009 14:52:34 Jonathan McKeown wrote: On Thursday 16 April 2009 12:27:04 Mel Flynn wrote: But yes, all-depends-list is exactly that, with the provision that it does not take changed OPTIONS into account. That's what I suspected you were saying yesterday, and it seems to

Re: make run-depends-list-recursive?

2009-04-15 Thread Jonathan McKeown
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 21:02:08 Mel Flynn wrote: On Monday 13 April 2009 03:56:15 Tim Judd wrote: make all-depends-list Two things: 1) It surpresses config target and if a port has OPTIONS set, then you may get surprised once you've configured the port and ticked/unticked an option I'm

Re: make run-depends-list-recursive?

2009-04-14 Thread Mel Flynn
On Monday 13 April 2009 03:56:15 Tim Judd wrote: On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.comwrote: Hi Is there a make target which will give a list of _all_ dependencies recursively not just next level up? Or a port? I tried ports-mgmt/pkg_tree but it only seems

Re: make run-depends-list-recursive?

2009-04-14 Thread Chris Whitehouse
Mel Flynn wrote: On Monday 13 April 2009 03:56:15 Tim Judd wrote: On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.comwrote: Hi Is there a make target which will give a list of _all_ dependencies recursively not just next level up? Or a port? I tried ports-mgmt/pkg_tree but it

make run-depends-list-recursive?

2009-04-12 Thread Chris Whitehouse
Hi Is there a make target which will give a list of _all_ dependencies recursively not just next level up? Or a port? I tried ports-mgmt/pkg_tree but it only seems to work with installed ports. I don't care if I get duplicates as long as every dependency is listed at least once. Thanks

Re: make run-depends-list-recursive?

2009-04-12 Thread Tim Judd
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.comwrote: Hi Is there a make target which will give a list of _all_ dependencies recursively not just next level up? Or a port? I tried ports-mgmt/pkg_tree but it only seems to work with installed ports. I don't care if I get