On 14/01/2013 22:44, n j wrote:
One thing to think about would be the option of port maintainers uploading
the pre-compiled package of the updated port (or if the size of the upload
is an issue then just the hash signature of the valid package archive so
other people with more bandwidth can
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 14/01/2013 22:44, n j wrote:
One thing to think about would be the option of port maintainers
uploading
the pre-compiled package of the updated port (or if the size of the
upload
is an issue then just the hash
n j nin...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 14/01/2013 22:44, n j wrote:
One thing to think about would be the option of port maintainers
uploading
the pre-compiled package of the updated port (or if the size of the
upload
Hi,
One of my primary concerns when managing a system is its security. In the
interest of security, I usually hold to that patch early, patch often.
Ports are kept well up-to-date and with portmaster it is not a problem to
keep updating the ports. However, as Ivan [1] pointed out on his blog on
On 1/14/2013 1:07 PM, n j wrote:
Hi,
One of my primary concerns when managing a system is its security. In the
interest of security, I usually hold to that patch early, patch often.
Ports are kept well up-to-date and with portmaster it is not a problem to
keep updating the ports. However, as
On 14/01/2013 13:10, Andrei Brezan wrote:
I thing that it's good to wait for ports to compile and to be able to
chose your configure options for the packages you install. It's good to
know what options you need and what options you don't and why, that's
one of the reasons why i'm using
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Andrei Brezan andrei...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/14/2013 1:07 PM, n j wrote:
Hi,
One of my primary concerns when managing a system is its security. In the
interest of security, I usually hold to that patch early, patch often.
Ports are kept well up-to-date and
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 14/01/2013 13:10, Andrei Brezan wrote:
I thing that it's good to wait for ports to compile and to be able to
chose your configure options for the packages you install. It's good to
know what options you need and
On 14/01/2013 14:36, n j wrote:
The point of my question was exactly if it was possible to elaborate on the
pre-compiled packages from FreeBSD official repositories part. Would it
be possible to have a (security-wise) up-to-date pre-compiled packages in
the official repositories? Note, I don't
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 14/01/2013 14:36, n j wrote:
The point of my question was exactly if it was possible to elaborate on
the
pre-compiled packages from FreeBSD official repositories part. Would it
be possible to have a
10 matches
Mail list logo
