Hello all,
Thanks for the awesome OS!
I am a Linux user and I just started using FreeBSD. It is awesome, and
the Handbook as well!
I am following Chapter 24 of the Handbook to update my system.
First I completed the freebsd-update
Then I ran portupgrade -av
Then I ran portsnap.
When I
On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:23:58 +0200, Coert lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
First I completed the freebsd-update
Then I ran portupgrade -av
Then I ran portsnap.
It's a bit confusing to me. Why do you first update your installed
ports, then the ports database? I would thing it would make more
Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:23:58 +0200, Coert lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
First I completed the freebsd-update
Then I ran portupgrade -av
Then I ran portsnap.
It's a bit confusing to me. Why do you first update your installed
ports, then the ports database? I would thing it
On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:26:49 +0200, Coert lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
I checked the man page, and the -PP option is indeed what I am looking for.
The -PP option forces packages. Keep in mind that it *may* happen
that there isn't a package for a specific port, or a package uses
the default
Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 10:26:49 +0200, Coert lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
I checked the man page, and the -PP option is indeed what I am looking for.
The -PP option forces packages. Keep in mind that it *may* happen
that there isn't a package for a specific port, or a
On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:44:14 Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by
Hello,
yesterday, having to install kdeadmin, I issued the following command
portupgrade -vnyNb -l file kdeadmin-3.5.10
Noting that n is negated by y (my mistake), the result of this command was
+ print/cups-base
+ print/xdvik
+ print/cm-super
+
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
portupgrade question
Hello,
yesterday, having to install kdeadmin, I issued the following command
portupgrade -vnyNb -l file kdeadmin-3.5.10
Noting that n is negated by y (my mistake), the result of this command
@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
portupgrade question
Hello,
yesterday, having to install kdeadmin, I issued the following command
portupgrade -vnyNb -l file kdeadmin-3.5.10
Noting that n is negated by y (my mistake), the result of this command
was
+ print
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
-N
--new
Install a new port/package when a specified package is not installed.
Prior
to the installation a new port/package, all
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
-N
--new
Install a new port/package when a specified
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 10:20:41PM +0100, RW wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:00:28 +1200
Jonathan Chen j...@chen.org.nz wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:50:17PM +0200, dan wrote:
THat's the point !
isnt that -R implied by -N ?
From the portupgrade man page
[...]
On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions?
You could add:
BATCH=yes
to /etc/make.conf.
Or use the --batch command line option to
On Tue, 7 April 2009 16:17:40 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Apr 6, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for
config questions?
You could add:
BATCH=yes
to
/portupgrade-question-tp22920813p22920813.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:55 PM, new_guy byte8b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, new_guy wrote:
Silly question... when I use portupgrade on gnome installs, it interrupts
itself a lot to prompt for config options. I normally take all the defaults.
Is there a way to use portupgrade without all the stopping for config
questions? I'd like to leave my laptop
What do we do about packages that fail to update?
This is my first time running portupgrade, and am unsure what to think about
the ones where there is a configure error or uknown build error or
install error
FYI -- I followed the following steps:
1) upgraded from 7.0-RELEASE to 7.1-RELEASE
2)
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 03:24:10PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
What do we do about packages that fail to update?
This is my first time running portupgrade, and am unsure what to think about
the ones where there is a configure error or uknown build error or
install error
FYI -- I followed
Hi all:
I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked fine
and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power on my xp
station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box.
What shall i do so that i don't have to start over again?
Thanks in advance
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:13 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it worked
fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly i lost power
on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1 box.
What
Thanks Glen:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over again?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: portupgrade question
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general questions
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:25 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Glen:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to start over
again?
Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart
the portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off.
Otherwise,
Thanks Glen:
So use portupgrade -fa -y again or a bit different knobs?
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: portupgrade question
To: ipfr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd general questions freebsd-questions
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:29 PM, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Glen:
So use portupgrade -fa -y again or a bit different knobs?
Please stop top-posting.
Continue with the command you had already used.
--
Glen Barber
___
Glen Barber writes:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
start over again?
Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart the
portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it left off.
Not according to my understanding of portupgrade.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Glen Barber writes:
Never used screen. Does that mean it is too late and I have to
start over again?
Note that I said: You *should* just be able to restart the
portupgrade, and (ideally) it should start where it
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:13:19 -0800 (PST)
gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
I was doing portupgrade -fa -y remotely via ssh (desktop xp), it
worked fine and was still running almost two days (7.1). But suddenly
i lost power on my xp station, lost ssh connection to the freebsd7.1
box.
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 12:35:03 +1000
From: Fraser Tweedale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or make solver
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or make solver
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05:02PM +, AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want
AN wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If you want SDK and/or solver, please type make sdk and/or
On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:54:15 -0500, AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed openoffice 2.4.0 from ports with:
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA install clean
Now, when I do a portupgrade it tries to install mozilla:
To build OOo, you should have a lot
of free diskspace (~ 11GB) and memory (~ 2GB).
If
* AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-13-2008]:
How do I portupgrade openoffice and get it to use the -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
option from the command line? What is the correct way to do this?
Look for references to MAKE_ARGS in $PREFIX/etc/pkgtools.conf.
--
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
Nikola Lecic wrote:
So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
in the Handbook.
I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need to
be set there. Why? Because - as far as I know - they will apply to
Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:36:53 +0400 (GST)
Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:56:52 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikola Lecic wrote:
So the /etc/make.conf option is better.
It is definitively the most universal and IMHO it should appear
in the Handbook.
I try to avoid setting things in make.conf that do not need
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:18:11 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've gone for a portconf based solution for now, although, when I get
the chance, I'll try to test how portupgrade behaves wrt
dependencies.
Please don't forget to try switching to portupgrade-devel in that
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'. One
of the ports that was updated was vim, which had originally been
installed without X11:
# cd /usr/ports/editors/vim
# NO_GUI=1 make install clean
Now, this option appears to have been lost as I've ended up with a
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing here.
One of the ports that was updated was vim, which had originally
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:40:30AM +0200, Nikola Lecic wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:12:40 +0100
Christopher Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've just CVSupped my ports collection and run 'portupgrade -ra'.
Hello Christopher,
'portupgrade -a' is just enough, '-r' means nothing
Nikola Lecic wrote:
Yes, options are not saved that way and Vim's default is with X11.
Please make sure that the following lines exist in
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'editors/vim' = 'NO_GUI=yes',
[... options for other ports ...]
}
Next time portupgrade
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 17:12 +0100, RW wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
-Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
Make sense. I've been using these
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:57:05 -0700
Michael S. Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't use the ``p'' option. Use something like ``-afrRPv''.
-Rr doesn't actually do anything in combination with -a
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
ive been using 'portupgrade -apP' on my systems lately (since i keep a central
repository of packages i build for my systems; a good bulk of them are used
across most/all of them).
in situations where new packages are built from ports (ie, when the package
in /usr/ports/packages/All is no
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:29 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
ive been using 'portupgrade -apP' on my systems lately (since i keep a
central
repository of packages i build for my systems; a good bulk of them are used
across most/all of them).
in situations where new packages are built from
On Saturday October 21, 2006 at 08:29:05 (PM) Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
Hi people,
I just did the portupgrade -rf pkg-config\* to upgrade the apps, but i
think some of the upgrades went wrong so there are a whole bunch ports
skipped. I noticed glib20 has some compilation error, and probably is
Hi people,
I just did the portupgrade -rf pkg-config\* to upgrade the apps, but i
think some of the upgrades went wrong so there are a whole bunch ports
skipped. I noticed glib20 has some compilation error, and probably is the
cause to all the rest. To fix this, should I apply the same command
On 7/20/06, Nagy László [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After running
portupgrade -aP
I get this:
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.7_1) (install error)
* x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4)
*
After running
portupgrade -aP
I get this:
** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed)
! textproc/linux-expat (linux-expat-1.95.7_1) (install error)
* x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig (linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4)
* x11/linux-XFree86-libs
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
just fine on the same machine.
Thanks a lot.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:29:10PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget works
just fine on the same machine.
Different defaults.
Thanks a lot.
np.
Kris
pgpbQ76wJJ4Xj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:29:10 -0400
Subject: Re: portupgrade question (solved)
I did define the to environment variables. For some reason, wget
works just fine on the same machine.
Thanks a lot.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35
Good day everyone!
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for some reason. At first I thought
that
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for some
Thanks, I will definitely try it out.
On 6/7/06, Andrey Slusar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400, Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400, Michael S wrote:
Good day everyone!
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well.
What did you try? fetch works fine with proxies for the rest of us :)
Kris
pgpQqWxSTgnVY.pgp
At Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:38:36 -0400,
Michael S wrote:
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch for
I had them set, but in lower case - $http_proxy and $ftp_proxy. wget
doesn't have a problem with that.
More precisely (applogies for not specifying in the first place) the
problem was retrieving files from FTP hosts. HTTP sites were fine.
On 6/7/06, Toni Schmidbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having
problems fetching files from FTP sites.
No idea what the problem is.
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:38:36AM -0400,
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Michael S wrote:
Good day everyone!
I have a portupgrade related question. I am behind a proxy and fetch
doesn't appear to cope with it very well. I installed wget and it
works great. I updated the pkgtools.conf to reflect that, however
portupgrade insists on using fetch
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:35:12PM -0400, Michael S wrote:
wget works like magic. I used the defaults. fetch I guess is the
FreeBSD default for fetching files from the web. It was having
problems fetching files from FTP sites.
No idea what the problem is.
Try setting FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. This
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:42:44AM +0930, Ian Moore wrote:
So to sum up, it's a problem with the way the ports system detects wether the
mysql-client port is installed that caused the problem (I thought it just
used the ports database), and/or it's a problem with the mysql-client port
not
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened with
it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been upgraded, I've run
portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda.
The libgda upgrade has caused a re-install of mysql-client-4, but when
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been upgraded,
I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda.
Sorry, I forgot to add the
On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been
upgraded,
I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of
On Monday 24 April 2006 21:20, Richard Collyer wrote:
On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been
upgraded,
I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a
I have:
FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=YES
in /etc/make.conf
for portupgrade or if I need to re-install a port manually.
-Derek
At 06:16 AM 4/24/2006, Ian Moore wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
Ian Moore wrote:
Yes, that would fix the problem, but I'm just curious about what causes the
problem in the first place, given that portupgrade rarely seems to have these
kind of problems.
Cheers,
ls -l /var/db/pkg/mysql-client*??
Kevin Kinsey
--
A method of solution is perfect if
On Monday 24 April 2006 22:38, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Ian Moore wrote:
Yes, that would fix the problem, but I'm just curious about what causes
the problem in the first place, given that portupgrade rarely seems to
have these kind of problems.
Cheers,
ls -l /var/db/pkg/mysql-client*??
Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened with
it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been upgraded, I've run
portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda.
The libgda upgrade has caused a re-install of
On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote:
On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been
RW wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote:
On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
with it a couple of times now. The last 2
Ian Moore wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 22:38, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Ian Moore wrote:
Yes, that would fix the problem, but I'm just curious about what causes
the problem in the first place, given that portupgrade rarely seems to
have these kind of problems.
Cheers,
ls -l
On Monday 24 April 2006 21:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
RW wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote:
On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
with
On Monday 24 April 2006 23:56, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Ian Moore wrote:
Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been upgraded,
I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda.
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 23:57, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 22), Ben Paley said:
I've got three versions of libtool on my system:
bash-2.05b$ pkg_info | grep libtool
libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (version 1.3)
libtool-1.4.3_2 Generic shared
Hello,
I've got three versions of libtool on my system:
bash-2.05b$ pkg_info | grep libtool
libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (version 1.3)
libtool-1.4.3_2 Generic shared library support script
libtool-1.5 Generic shared library support script
bash-2.05b$
In the last episode (Jun 22), Ben Paley said:
I've got three versions of libtool on my system:
bash-2.05b$ pkg_info | grep libtool
libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (version 1.3)
libtool-1.4.3_2 Generic shared library support script
libtool-1.5 Generic
I recently ran a portupgrade on one of our servers. The following
error and exchange came up:
server# pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry database
Stale dependency: portupgrade-20040325_1 - openssl-0.9.7d
(security/openssl):
New dependency? (? to help): ?
[Enter] to skip, [Ctrl]+[D]
On Monday 29 March 2004 12:03 pm, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
I recently ran a portupgrade on one of our servers. The following
error and exchange came up:
server# pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package registry database
Stale dependency: portupgrade-20040325_1 - openssl-0.9.7d
(security/openssl):
Hello,
I have installed portupgrade tool on my system. I need some clarification before i use
it. At present, my system has mysql3.23,Apache1.3 and no php.
Earlier, My system had php4.2.2 but when i used pkg_update php4.2.2 ; php4-4.2.2 got
uninstalled and new version php4-4.3.3 was not
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:19:36AM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
packages, and ports
Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with
ports, so that all are ports after it's run?
-ste
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:
Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with
ports, so that all are
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 12:55:55AM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote:
I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with ports,
so that all
I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are
packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with
packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with ports,
so that all are ports after it's run?
-ste
When I run portupgrade -aP after running cvsup, I get this error:
I think I have fixed it before by reinstalling lessTif and
OpenMotif and possibly imake-4 but then I have gotten bitten by
the broken widgets in some version of openmotif.
Obviously, I'm going about this the wrong way: what is
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Jason Hunt thusly...
Personally I have always just installed the newer version of a
port on-top of the older one. Then I go through the package
database and fix the dependencies ... After fixing the
dependencies I just remove the directory for the old
At 11:42 PM 10.24.2002 -0400, you wrote:
On 24 Oct 2002, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
It looks to me like there is no reason for both aalib-1.4.r5 and
aalib-1.4.r5_1. Seems that portupgrade does not cause this problem and
is the prefered upgrade method
There are numerous examples of this issue. My
On 24 Oct 2002, Kirk R. Wythers wrote:
It looks to me like there is no reason for both aalib-1.4.r5 and
aalib-1.4.r5_1. Seems that portupgrade does not cause this problem and
is the prefered upgrade method
There are numerous examples of this issue. My question is: what is the
recommended
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Kirk R. Wythers thusly...
aalib-1.4.r5 needs updating (port has 1.4.r5_1)
aalib-1.4.r5_1 = up-to-date with port
...
There are numerous examples of this issue. My question is: what is
the recommended way to
94 matches
Mail list logo
