On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 17:57:31 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:11:29 -0500
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:29:45 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:11:25 -0400
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
As long as we're talking about clang, I have two questions.
1) Is there any generic reason why a port compiled with clang
won't work on a world compiled with gcc?
No, none that I'm aware of. I've
Conrad J. Sabatier writes:
Note, too, that none of these exceptions have anything to do with
my /usr/src builds. I've been using clang for buildworld and
buildkernel for quite some time now.
I've heard that, but I think I'll wait until it becomes the
official default. :-)
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:06:08 -0400
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Conrad J. Sabatier writes:
Note, too, that none of these exceptions have anything to do with
my /usr/src builds. I've been using clang for buildworld and
buildkernel for quite some time now.
I've heard
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
I can well understand your hesitation. I didn't jump on the clang
bandwagon for a good while myself, either.
But, from examining and comparing clang's assembly language output
against gcc's, it does seem pretty apparent that clang produces
some
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:29:45 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
Have you tried clang with ccache? Any tricks?
No, I haven't tried that. Actually, I don't believe I've ever even
tried using ccache at all (at least, not that I can recall). :-)
--
Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:11:29 -0500
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:29:45 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
Have you tried clang with ccache? Any tricks?
No, I haven't tried that. Actually, I don't believe I've ever even
tried using
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:11:29 -0500
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:29:45 -0600 (MDT)
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
Have you tried clang with ccache? Any tricks?
No, I haven't tried that. Actually, I
Stupid question, but I need to clarify and make sure I'm right here:
what should I see as the running process if clang is compiling? ATM I
see cc1plus.
I'm trying to set CC and friends make variables to clang for a build,
but it doesn't appear to be 'sticking'. It seems to change the shell
R Skinner wrote:
Stupid question, but I need to clarify and make sure I'm right here:
what should I see as the running process if clang is compiling? ATM I
see cc1plus.
I'm trying to set CC and friends make variables to clang for a build,
but it doesn't appear to be 'sticking'. It seems to
On Sat 2012-03-31 20:32:04 UTC+1000, R Skinner
(ro...@herveybayaustralia.com.au) wrote:
Stupid question, but I need to clarify and make sure I'm right here:
what should I see as the running process if clang is compiling? ATM I
see cc1plus.
clang for C, clang++ for C++
I'm trying to set
On 03/31/12 23:56, andrew clarke wrote:
On Sat 2012-03-31 20:32:04 UTC+1000, R Skinner
(ro...@herveybayaustralia.com.au) wrote:
Stupid question, but I need to clarify and make sure I'm right here:
what should I see as the running process if clang is compiling? ATM I
see cc1plus.
clang for C,
As long as we're talking about clang, I have two questions.
1) Is there any generic reason why a port compiled with clang
won't work on a world compiled with gcc?
2) If not, how do I set that up?
Robert Huff
.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/ps-clang-and-make-variables-tp5608586p5609272.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
14 matches
Mail list logo
