Re: dhcp server returns core dump when i define network with mask 8

2013-07-23 Thread Frank Leonhardt
On 23/07/2013 09:03, jb wrote: s m sam.gh1986 at gmail.com writes: ... subnet 192.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 { range 192.0.0.1 192.255.255.255; The 'range' denotes IP addresses that can be allocated to clients. The IP 192.255.255.255 is a reserved broadcast address for the network. jb

Re: dhcp server returns core dump when i define network with mask 8

2013-07-23 Thread s m
thanks Frank, 192 is just a sample. if i want to define 125.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0, dhcp server core dump either. you're right, it is better to use just some limited addresses to avoid possible troubles. but i want to run my dhcp server for all possible networks. now my question is: if i define

Re: dhcp server returns core dump when i define network with mask 8

2013-07-23 Thread J . McKeown
Quoting Frank Leonhardt fra...@fjl.co.uk: There are two common ways of defining a subnet mask - one is a dotted quad (e.g. 255.255.255.0) and the other is with a slash and the number of low-order bits - e.g. 192.168.1.0/8. Eight bits here means you get 2^8 addresses (i.e. 256). Don't use

Re: dhcp server returns core dump when i define network with mask 8

2013-07-23 Thread jb
s m sam.gh1986 at gmail.com writes: and thank you jb but if i define my network like below, server runs correctly: log-facility local7; subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 { range 192.168.0.1 192.168.255.255; } i think 192.168.255.55 is reserved for broadcast too. is it not

Re: dhcp server returns core dump when i define network with mask 8

2013-07-23 Thread Frank Leonhardt
On 23/07/2013 13:35, j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote: Quoting Frank Leonhardt fra...@fjl.co.uk: There are two common ways of defining a subnet mask - one is a dotted quad (e.g. 255.255.255.0) and the other is with a slash and the number of low-order bits - e.g. 192.168.1.0/8. Eight bits here means

Re: dhcp server returns core dump when i define network with mask 8

2013-07-23 Thread jb
s m sam.gh1986 at gmail.com writes: ... subnet 192.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 { range 192.0.0.1 192.255.255.255; The 'range' denotes IP addresses that can be allocated to clients. The IP 192.255.255.255 is a reserved broadcast address for the network. jb

Re: DHCP server

2008-10-29 Thread Svein Halvor Halvorsen
bofh42 wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ dhcpcd -n eth0 eth0: dhcpcd 4.0.2 starting eth0: broadcasting for a lease eth0: offered 10.0.0.176 from 10.0.1.1 `mirrorball' eth0: checking 10.0.0.176 is available on attached networks Are

Re: DHCP server

2008-10-28 Thread Polytropon
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:38:22 -0400, bofh42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you sure you are using the correct command to start the DHCP client? I'm not familiar with Archlinux, but on Debian linux the command you need is dhclient. That's

re: DHCP server

2008-10-25 Thread bofh42
On Friday 24 October 2008, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: Hi, I'm not sure if this is an issue with my dhcp server or the client, but since I seem to get troubles with two different clients, I'm thinking it might be the server:

Re: DHCP server

2008-10-24 Thread Daniel Bye
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:43:32AM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: Hi, I'm not sure if this is an issue with my dhcp server or the client, but since I seem to get troubles with two different clients, I'm thinking it might be the server: I've got a FreeBSD 7.0-p4 machine running

Re: DHCP server

2008-10-24 Thread Wojciech Puchar
a lease, this happens: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ dhcpcd -n eth0 eth0: dhcpcd 4.0.2 starting eth0: broadcasting for a lease eth0: offered 10.0.0.176 from 10.0.1.1 `mirrorball' what's your netmask? if /24 your dhcp server is misconfigured

Re: DHCP server

2008-10-24 Thread Svein Halvor Halvorsen
Wojciech Puchar wrote: a lease, this happens: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ dhcpcd -n eth0 eth0: dhcpcd 4.0.2 starting eth0: broadcasting for a lease eth0: offered 10.0.0.176 from 10.0.1.1 `mirrorball' what's your netmask? if /24 your dhcp server is

Re: DHCP server

2008-10-24 Thread Svein Halvor Halvorsen
Daniel Bye wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:43:32AM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: Hi, I'm not sure if this is an issue with my dhcp server or the client, but since I seem to get troubles with two different clients, I'm thinking it might be the server: I've got a FreeBSD 7.0-p4

RE: DHCP server

2008-10-24 Thread Bob McConnell
On Behalf Of Svein Halvor Halvorsen Daniel Bye wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:43:32AM +0200, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: I'm not sure if this is an issue with my dhcp server or the client, but since I seem to get troubles with two different clients, I'm thinking it might be the server:

Re: DHCP server with no persistent storage

2008-05-15 Thread Peter Boosten
Quoting Luke Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Will the DHCP server be this trouble-free if I switch my whole network to dynamic IPs? When the DHCP server goes offline, then comes back online, what happens? M0n0wall does it (http://m0n0.ch). I run M0n0 on my 4801 (I'm not using any DHCP on it

Re: DHCP Server

2008-02-24 Thread Wojciech Puchar
BSD box, the other client is connected via a bridge on the first client. I have a section in my /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf to assign a specific IP to client #1: host myhost { hardware ethernet xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx; fixed address 192.168.1.16; } The problem is, both client #1 and #2 get assigned

RE: DHCP Server

2008-02-24 Thread Jaco le Roux
-Original Message- From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 February 2008 08:56 PM To: Jaco le Roux Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP Server BSD box, the other client is connected via a bridge on the first client. I have a section in my /usr

Re: DHCP Server V3.0.5 No BPF under chroot. Works normally otherwise.

2007-03-06 Thread Kelly D. Grills
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 07:03:35PM -0600, Martin McCormick wrote: I found some cook-book instructions for running dhcpd in a chroot environment. The article is 4 years old and appears to be set up for FreeBSD5x, but it isn't far off for FreeBSD6.2 which is what I need dhcpd to run on.

Re: DHCP server questions

2007-01-18 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Darryl Hoar wrote: I am considering modifying my web/email server by adding DHCP server duties to it. Any problems with this idea ? I can reboot the server if I need to without screwing up the clients that already have IP assigned, can't I ? No, the DHCP

RE: DHCP server questions

2007-01-18 Thread Darryl Hoar
-Original Message- From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP server questions On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Darryl Hoar wrote: I am considering modifying my web

Re: DHCP server questions

2007-01-18 Thread Jay Chandler
Darryl Hoar wrote: Thanks Chuck. I do grok that rebooting is only really needed for new kernel installs. Just making network design decisions and want to avoid those Oh, crap moments. -Darryl I haven't found too many mutually exclusive services on Unix. In theory, if we did away with

Re: dhcp server on multiple interfaces.

2005-11-14 Thread Yance Kowara
I hope this helps, assuming you have /usr/share/doc/dhcp-3.0pl1/dhcpd.conf.sample Follow the steps #cp /usr/share/doc/dhcp-3.0pl1/dhcpd.conf.sample /etc/dhcpd.conf #ee /etc/dhcpd.conf your dhcpd.conf ###BEGIN DHCPD.CONF authoritative ddns-update-style interim ignore

RE: DHCP Server Offline.

2005-07-16 Thread Paul Hamilton
@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP Server Offline. I Found out the Problem, The /var partation is full. How do i find out where is taking up all the space? Thanks From: Ean Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DHCP Server Offline. Date: Fri, 15 Jul

Re: DHCP Server Offline.

2005-07-15 Thread Ean Kingston
On July 15, 2005 10:11 am, Stephan Weaver wrote: Hello folks, I have a Stand Alone FreeBSD Firewall / Nat / Dhcp Server. Everything seems to work fine, up until this morning. Users seem to complain they could not get on the network anymore. Further investigation revealed the dhcp server

Re: DHCP Server Offline.

2005-07-15 Thread Stephan Weaver
I Found out the Problem, The /var partation is full. How do i find out where is taking up all the space? Thanks From: Ean Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DHCP Server Offline. Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:18:09 -0400 On July 15

Re: DHCP Server Offline.

2005-07-15 Thread David van Geyn
up all the space? Thanks From: Ean Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DHCP Server Offline. Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:18:09 -0400 On July 15, 2005 10:11 am, Stephan Weaver wrote: Hello folks, I have a Stand Alone FreeBSD Firewall

Re: DHCP server performance

2005-03-16 Thread Jerry McAllister
Greetings, I want to setup a DHCP server on my internal (private 192.168.1.X) network. I already have a Freebsd machine on the network as a webserver. Should I dedicate an entire machine to being a DHCP server ? Or will the load be minimal and I can put the DHCP server functionality on

Re: DHCP server performance

2005-03-16 Thread Charles Swiger
On Mar 16, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Darryl Hoar wrote: Should I dedicate an entire machine to being a DHCP server ? Or will the load be minimal and I can put the DHCP server functionality on my webserver ? A DHCP server is very lightweight, and you can run one on a machine used for other tasks just

Re: DHCP Server Question

2004-03-23 Thread Charles Swiger
I have successfully set up my DHCP server on FreeBSD 5.2 but have a question. I only want my DHCP server to hand out IPs to known MAC addresses entered into dhcpd.conf how can I do this? Create entries which look like this: host linksys { hardware ethernet 00:20:78:d2:03:05; fixed-address

Re: DHCP Server Question

2004-03-23 Thread JP
So I would remove the range entry? Thanks, JP --- Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have successfully set up my DHCP server on FreeBSD 5.2 but have a question. I only want my DHCP server to hand out IPs to known MAC addresses entered into dhcpd.conf how can I do this?

Re: DHCP Server Question

2004-03-23 Thread Charles Swiger
On Mar 23, 2004, at 4:22 PM, JP wrote: So I would remove the range entry? Hmm, no, that's not what I meant. Staticly assigned IP addresses should be outside the range of dynamic IPs, but you can use both together. I'll copy a complete, working dhcp.conf file below. [ It is intended for

Re: DHCP-server - suggestions?

2003-11-26 Thread Jon Mercer
Been using the ISC DHCP server for years now. No problems to report, and not too onerous to set up. Also allows you to do dynamic updates to the ISC BIND port as well. Jon On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 15:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm about to set up a DHCP-server. In the ports-coll I found

Re: DHCP-server - suggestions?

2003-11-26 Thread Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm about to set up a DHCP-server. In the ports-coll I found these: Port: isc-dhcp3-3.0.1.r12 Info: ISC Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol client and server code Port: wide-dhcp-1.4.0.6_2 Info: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol, WIDE Implementation

Re: DHCP-server - suggestions?

2003-11-26 Thread Chris Howells
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Wednesday 26 November 2003 15:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Port: isc-dhcp3-3.0.1.r12 Info: ISC Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol client and server code I use this and it's fine; the configuration file is easy to understand, and it

Re: DHCP Server learning name servers since server itself is dhcp'd??

2003-03-09 Thread Lowell Gilbert
IAccounts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Alternatively is there a way to dynamically tell BIND to get it's forwarders list from /etc/resolv.conf? This could be done pretty much the same way. I thought I'd done it on my system, but as I look at named.conf, I don't seem to have ever

Re: DHCP Server learning name servers since server itself isdhcp'd??

2003-03-08 Thread IAccounts
Alternatively is there a way to dynamically tell BIND to get it's forwarders list from /etc/resolv.conf? This could be done pretty much the same way. I thought I'd done it on my system, but as I look at named.conf, I don't seem to have ever finished the shell script to auto-generate the

Re: DHCP Server learning name servers since server itself is dhcp'd??

2003-03-08 Thread Mikko Työläjärvi
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, IAccounts wrote: Alternatively is there a way to dynamically tell BIND to get it's forwarders list from /etc/resolv.conf? Here is a shell script snippet that I use on my laptop. It gets called from make_resolv_conf() in /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks, where I make sure not

Re: DHCP Server learning name servers since server itself is dhcp'd??

2003-03-08 Thread David Kelly
On Saturday 08 March 2003 12:32 pm, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: It is more elegant in perl, but dhclient-enter-hooks is a shellscript, so it felt easier to just add it there. /etc/dhclient-enter-hooks needs to be created in any case if you wish to use named else it will write an /etc/resolv.conf

Re: DHCP Server learning name servers since server itself is dhcp'd??

2003-03-07 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi all - I'm setting up a server/gateway on a cable modem whose external interface has to use DHCP. There will be several clients on the internal network and the gateway will be running isc-dhcp. I know I can setup a nameserver on the

Re: DHCP server

2002-11-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 12:15:06AM -0800, Jonas Fornander wrote: I want to install a DHCP server on 4.7. In the Latest/packages I can only find the following packages that refers to dhcp: dhcpconf dhcpdump dchping (?) Is any of those the server? If not, which package is the server?