Hi
I have a stange thing.
1. 7.3-RELEASE-p2 on dell poweredge SC440 with bge nic
2. 9.0-PRERELEASE on another dell poweredge SC440 bge nic
3. 7.4-RELEASE-p4 in a vmware virtual machine with em nic
When i copy a file with scp which is a few hundred megabytes on 1. from 2.
or from 3. i get about
On 22/11/2011 15:17, Bas Smeelen wrote:
When i copy a file with scp which is a few hundred megabytes on2. from 1.i
get about 130 KB/s
I can find nothing in the logs or netstat errors on this 9.0-PRERELEASE box.
I have switched network kabels and ports on the switch.
How could i further
HI, Tri.
scp -pr * name@host:/home/dir
does not copy files which have ':' sign in their names
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
I have my .cshrc file run some basic netstat and 'w' commands so that when I
log
in, I can see at a glance what is going on on the system and notice any unusual
login activity, etc.
However this completely breaks both scp and rsync - they cannot function at all
(apparently) with any kind
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 15:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: George Sanders gosand1...@yahoo.com
Subject: Any way to have login output AND use rsync/scp ?
I have my .cshrc file run some basic netstat and 'w' commands so that
when I log in, I can see at a glance what is going on on the system
this completely breaks both scp and rsync - they cannot function at
all
(apparently) with any kind of stdio output from the shell.
Is there any way around this ?
Create a file ~/.login and put your commands (in sh syntax,
not csh) there. This file will only be executed at interactive
logins. See man
on on the system and notice any
unusual
login activity, etc.
However this completely breaks both scp and rsync - they cannot function at
all
(apparently) with any kind of stdio output from the shell.
Is there any way around this ?
Create a file ~/.login and put your commands (in sh
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:48:28PM +0100, krad wrote:
On 30 August 2010 20:02, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 August 2010 18:37, krad kra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 27 August 2010 20:13, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org writes:
Just to make =sure= about this: can using tar/gtar as root [or
sudo] make sure that all the permissions are correct? It =may=
save me keystrokes, :_)
Permissions, yes. If you want flags, you'll need the base system tar.
On 30 August 2010 20:02, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 August 2010 18:37, krad kra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 27 August 2010 20:13, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com
wrote:
Rename them, copy, then rename
On 30 August 2010 18:38, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, krad kra...@googlemail.com wrote:
sounds like a bodge to me
Sounds like FUD to me.
--
Adam Vande More
maybe but why install extra things when you dont have to.
install extra things when you dont have to.
Because this allows people to use scp and nothing else; mooting your argument:
''SFTP is better than scp if you just want to transfer files, as the users
dont have to have shell access to the box to use the openssh SFTP
system. [snip]''
How difficult
Sounds like FUD to me.
--
Adam Vande More
maybe but why install extra things when you dont have to.
Because this allows people to use scp and nothing else; mooting your
argument:
''SFTP is better than scp if you just want to transfer files, as the users
dont have to have
...@googlemail.com wrote:
sounds like a bodge to me
Sounds like FUD to me.
--
Adam Vande More
maybe but why install extra things when you dont have to.
Because this allows people to use scp and nothing else; mooting your
argument:
''SFTP is better than scp if you just want
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:27 AM, krad kra...@googlemail.com wrote:
ill repeat but why install extra things when you dont have to?. I dont
think i mentioned difficulty did i?
In addition to moving to a more tightly integrated OpenSSL derivative and
the benefits from such a move, SCP
On 30 August 2010 06:00, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:39 AM, krad kra...@googlemail.com wrote:
SFTP is better than scp if you just want to transfer files, as the users
dont have to have shell access to the box to use the openssh SFTP system
On 27 August 2010 20:13, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com
wrote:
Rename them, copy, then rename them back?
Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together,
transfer the archive, untar it; rename
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:30 PM, krad kra...@googlemail.com wrote:
sounds like a bodge to me
Sounds like FUD to me.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/27/10 1:07 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other
dot files? scp doesn't do it.
tx,
scp u
On 30 August 2010 18:37, krad kra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 27 August 2010 20:13, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com
wrote:
Rename them, copy, then rename them back?
Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar
can anybody point me to the web directions of howto automate the
% ssh -i /home/kline/.ssh/Zeropasswd-id zen
so i can get around with fewer keystrokes? and automate some backup
stuff?
tia, guys.
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
The 7.83a
file home.dump to pipe the data directly to a transfer via
scp. On the target machine,
# cd /home
# restore -rf /where/is/home.dump
You can connect both commands with ssh so you can directly
dump + restore from machine A to machine B, given that SSH is
possible.
It then would
'Gary == 'Gary Kline' kl...@thought.org writes:
'Gary at least for me, gtar fails to pick up dotfiles.
How did you invoke it?
There's a big difference between:
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything
and
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss all the
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 07:06:33AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
'Gary == 'Gary Kline' kl...@thought.org writes:
'Garyat least for me, gtar fails to pick up dotfiles.
How did you invoke it?
There's a big difference between:
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should
'Gary == 'Gary Kline' kl...@thought.org writes:
There's a big difference between:
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything
and
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss all the dotfiles
Did you do the latter, by chance?
'Gary Sure. my default is the asterisk.
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:12:11 -0700, mer...@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
wrote:
'Gary == 'Gary Kline' kl...@thought.org writes:
There's a big difference between:
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything
and
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:12:11PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
'Gary == 'Gary Kline' kl...@thought.org writes:
There's a big difference between:
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get everything
and
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz * # will miss all the dotfiles
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 09:34:59PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:12:11 -0700, mer...@stonehenge.com (Randal L.
Schwartz) wrote:
'Gary == 'Gary Kline' kl...@thought.org writes:
There's a big difference between:
cd $HOME gtar cfz /tmp/xx.tgz . # should get
On Sunday 29 August 2010, Polytropon wrote:
The problem (i. e. a convention) is that .* is not part of *,
which includes everything else, even nothing, and the
form *.* (that looks like the DOS equivalent of all files)
does seem to omit .*; the spaced form * .* would work as it
contains *
Dear Sir/Madam,
Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending
it to.
For more information on our business please click on the following
link:
[1]Click here for our website
We look forward to your continued business in the future.
Regards,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:39 AM, krad kra...@googlemail.com wrote:
SFTP is better than scp if you just want to transfer files, as the users
dont have to have shell access to the box to use the openssh SFTP system.
As
mentioned above dont confuse sftp with ftps/ftp-ssl
/usr/ports/shells
afterwards if needed. :-)
If i'm going to rename, say, ~/.Plans to ~/Plans and ~/.HowtoI18 to
~/HowtoI18, I may just scp -rp every ~/[.] file. the idea of using
find to collect a tarball may work.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa
them together,
transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if needed. :-)
If i'm going to rename, say, ~/.Plans to ~/Plans and ~/.HowtoI18 to
~/HowtoI18, I may just scp -rp every ~/[.] file. the idea of using
find to collect a tarball may work.
How about:
$ tar cjf - *dotfile
,
transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if needed. :-)
If i'm going to rename, say, ~/.Plans to ~/Plans and ~/.HowtoI18 to
~/HowtoI18, I may just scp -rp every ~/[.] file. the idea of using
find to collect a tarball may work.
I've been reading this thread, and I'm somewhat at a loss
?
Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together,
transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if needed. :-)
If i'm going to rename, say, ~/.Plans to ~/Plans and ~/.HowtoI18 to
~/HowtoI18, I may just scp -rp every ~/[.] file. the idea of using
find to collect
On 27 August 2010 06:19, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.ukwrote:
On 26/08/2010 23:07:35, Ed Flecko wrote:
I have a server I'm building that is internet accessible and I'm
wondering if there's any advantages/disadvantages of using either SFTP
-vs- SCP?
My primary concern
guys,
this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other
dot files? scp doesn't do it.
tx,
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
The 7.83a release
On 8/27/10 1:07 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other
dot files? scp doesn't do it.
tx,
scp u...@foo:\.dotfile .dotfile
Regards,
--
Glen Barber
Rename them, copy, then rename them back?
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gary Kline
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 12:08 PM
To: FreeBSD Mailing List
Subject: how do i scp .dotfiles??
guys
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other
dot files? scp doesn't do it.
scp -r to recursively copy directories? That should get
everything in each
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:19:40 -0400
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/27/10 1:07 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other
dot files? scp doesn't do
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:29:14AM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other
dot files? scp doesn't do it.
scp -r
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:25:01AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:19:40 -0400
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/27/10 1:07 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline
switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other
dot files? scp doesn't do it.
tx,
scp u...@foo:\.dotfile .dotfile
Regards,
Use rsync over ssh.
i've already done 98 or so straight scp copies. the thing is how
On 8/27/10 1:51 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
i've already done 98 or so straight scp copies. the thing is how
to use rsync over to an empty ethic? [[ empty == there are no \
dot files not .directories] i want EVERYTHING from this desktop,
tao, temp on ethic
Kline wrote:
guys,
this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other
dot files? scp doesn't do it.
tx,
scp u...@foo:\.dotfile .dotfile
Regards,
Use rsync over ssh
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:29:14AM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010, Gary Kline wrote:
guys,
this is the start of my master switchover. how to i copy/scp,say,
~/.purpur to home/kline/.purple? along with many hundreds of other
dot
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:21:12 -0500, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:
Rename them, copy, then rename them back?
Not good for a whole bunch of files; in this case: tar them together,
transfer the archive, untar it; rename afterwards if needed. :-)
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy
Hi folks,
I have a server I'm building that is internet accessible and I'm
wondering if there's any advantages/disadvantages of using either SFTP
-vs- SCP?
My primary concern is overall security of the server (even if that
means inconveniencing the end users), and I'm wondering if one method
...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ed Flecko
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 5:08 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Advantage -vs- Disadvantage: SFTP -vs- SCP
Hi folks,
I have a server I'm building that is internet accessible and I'm
wondering
Gary,
I agree...but I HAVE to give them access!
:-)
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010, Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a server I'm building that is internet accessible and I'm
wondering if there's any advantages/disadvantages of using either SFTP
-vs- SCP?
I would say that depends on what software the clients want to
use. FileZilla works nicely with sftp
On 26/08/2010 23:07:35, Ed Flecko wrote:
I have a server I'm building that is internet accessible and I'm
wondering if there's any advantages/disadvantages of using either SFTP
-vs- SCP?
My primary concern is overall security of the server (even if that
means inconveniencing the end users
I added a few lines to the bottom of my standard FreeBSD .cshrc file:
echo
w
echo
Just to show me what is going on each time I log in.
The problem is, when I try to scp a file to the system, I get 'w' output echo'd
to me, and no actual scp.
sftp fails as well - I can no longer log in via
in.
The corresponding system-wide file is /etc/csh.login.
I don't understand why .cshrc output is breaking non-interactive
SSH file transfer.
Because .cshrc is read (and that's why executed) every time a
shell is requested.
Is there a way to customize my .cshrc output while still retaining
scp
On Tue, May 25, 2010 11:05 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Checkout the security/openssh-portable port which has options to enable
chroot'ing. You should be able to configure the account to only be able
to use scp(1) or sftp(1) by editing sshd_config or by using forced
commands in the user
On Tue, May 25, 2010 11:23 pm, Balázs Mátéffy wrote:
Hello,
Try /usr/ports/shells/scponly .
Look up the features, this way you can assign the restrictive scponly
shell
to the users:
http://sublimation.org/scponly/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
Thanks,
I have used this before on linux. In
I want to provide some users with secure network attached storage over
SCP. The intent is to provide people with a similar thing to, e.g.
rsync.net but inside of our network only.
Security is obviously a priority so I would like each user to be chrooted
into their allocated directory and allow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/2010 22:29:57, Matthew Law wrote:
I want to provide some users with secure network attached storage over
SCP. The intent is to provide people with a similar thing to, e.g.
rsync.net but inside of our network only.
Security
:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/2010 22:29:57, Matthew Law wrote:
I want to provide some users with secure network attached storage over
SCP. The intent is to provide people with a similar thing to, e.g.
rsync.net but inside of our network only.
Security
A. Wright wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Can someone recommend a *known good* production quality copy mechanism
that will act like scp, but without the overhead? rsh? nc?
If you are happy with rsh authentication, then have you looked at
plain old rcp?
I reviewed
On Wednesday 08 April 2009 01:31:18 Steve Bertrand wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 16:13, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi all,
To copy data from one server, I normally (always) use scp.
I'm looking for a method to perform this copy task without the overhead
of encryption
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Can someone recommend a *known good* production quality copy mechanism
that will act like scp, but without the overhead? rsh? nc?
If you are happy with rsh authentication, then have you looked at
plain old rcp
Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca writes:
To copy data from one server, I normally (always) use scp.
I'm looking for a method to perform this copy task without the overhead
of encryption for infrequent, high-volume transfers (hundreds to
thousands of GB).
The data will be transferred server
Steve Bertrand wrote:
To copy data from one server, I normally (always) use scp.
I'm looking for a method to perform this copy task without the overhead
of encryption for infrequent, high-volume transfers (hundreds to
thousands of GB).
The data will be transferred server-to-server
To copy data from one server, I normally (always) use scp.
man rcp
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi all,
To copy data from one server, I normally (always) use scp.
I'm looking for a method to perform this copy task without the overhead
of encryption for infrequent, high-volume transfers (hundreds to
thousands of GB).
The data will be transferred server-to-server within a private datacentre
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi all,
To copy data from one server, I normally (always) use scp.
I'm looking for a method to perform this copy task without the overhead
of encryption for infrequent, high-volume transfers (hundreds to
thousands of GB).
The data will be transferred server-to-server
On Apr 7, 2009, at 16:13, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi all,
To copy data from one server, I normally (always) use scp.
I'm looking for a method to perform this copy task without the
overhead
of encryption for infrequent, high-volume transfers (hundreds to
thousands of GB).
The data
Doug Hardie wrote:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 16:13, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi all,
To copy data from one server, I normally (always) use scp.
I'm looking for a method to perform this copy task without the overhead
of encryption for infrequent, high-volume transfers (hundreds to
thousands of GB
someone recommend a *known good* production quality copy mechanism
that will act like scp, but without the overhead? rsh? nc?
Install /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable, and set the Enable HPN-
SSH patch option. You should then be able to use scp -c none
option, which is documented more fully
datacentre.
Can someone recommend a *known good* production quality copy mechanism
that will act like scp, but without the overhead? rsh? nc?
Install /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable, and set the Enable
HPN-SSH patch option. You should then be able to use scp -c none
option, which
Hi,
Can someone recommend a *known good* production quality copy mechanism
that will act like scp, but without the overhead? rsh? nc?
I sometime use tar+rsh. Tar because I want to be sure to preserve all
ownership and modes of the files and directories.
Bests,
olivier
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Hi all,
To copy data from one server, I normally (always) use scp.
I'm looking for a method to perform this copy task without the overhead
of encryption for infrequent, high-volume transfers (hundreds to
thousands of GB).
The data will be transferred server-to-server
Christopher Key wrote:
Hello,
I've come upon OpenSSH bug 472, whereby scp refuses usernames
containing a '#' character, dieing with 'invalid user name'. Both
rsync and ssh accept such usernames, and after looking at
/usr/src/crypto/openssh/scp.c, it would appear that scp also allows
Hello,
I've come upon OpenSSH bug 472, whereby scp refuses usernames containing
a '#' character, dieing with 'invalid user name'. Both rsync and ssh
accept such usernames, and after looking at
/usr/src/crypto/openssh/scp.c, it would appear that scp also allows such
usernames for the source
Hi Kalin,
Please try the following command, and let me know if you see any output
from it. If so, please post it here.
grep sshd /var/log/messages | tail -20
i did that earlier.. the last record for sshd is from 10.14, more
than a week ago
Regards,
Greg
-BEGIN PGP
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:06:00 -0400, kalin m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grep sshd /var/log/messages | tail -20
i did that earlier.. the last record for sshd is from 10.14, more
than a week ago
What about /var/log/auth.log? Maybe this file gives some
information...
--
Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:06:00 -0400, kalin m [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grep sshd /var/log/messages | tail -20
i did that earlier.. the last record for sshd is from 10.14, more
than a week ago
What about /var/log/auth.log? Maybe this file gives
On 22Oct08 22:14, kalin m wrote:
} I usually cheat and grab a copy of ssh-copy-id from the web; I suspect
} your issue has to do with permissions for the .ssh directory and the
} authorized_keys file.
}permissions are 600 for the file and 700 for .ssh
Permission of the remote user's home
hi all...
i need to do a script to copy a file from a remote machine via scp with
a key and without a password
here is what i'm doing:
1. ssh-keygen -t rsa
2. scp new_key.pub to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with password)
3. on remote_host rename new_key.pub to ~user/.ssh/athorized_keys
when i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kalin m wrote:
hi all...
i need to do a script to copy a file from a remote machine via scp with
a key and without a password
here is what i'm doing:
1. ssh-keygen -t rsa
2. scp new_key.pub to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with password)
3
On Oct 22, 2008, at 6:40 PM, kalin m wrote:
hi all...
i need to do a script to copy a file from a remote machine via scp
with a key and without a password
here is what i'm doing:
1. ssh-keygen -t rsa
2. scp new_key.pub to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with password)
3. on remote_host rename
Jay Chandler wrote:
On Oct 22, 2008, at 6:40 PM, kalin m wrote:
hi all...
i need to do a script to copy a file from a remote machine via scp
with a key and without a password
here is what i'm doing:
1. ssh-keygen -t rsa
2. scp new_key.pub to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with password)
3
: id_rsa when id_rsa is supposed to be the
private key?
?!?!
Greg Larkin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kalin m wrote:
hi all...
i need to do a script to copy a file from a remote machine via scp with
a key and without a password
here is what i'm doing:
1. ssh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kalin m wrote:
with -vvv i get this below:
.
debug1: bits set: 1034/2048
debug1: ssh_dss_verify: signature correct
debug1: kex_derive_keys
debug1: newkeys: mode 1
debug1:
need to do a script to copy a file from a remote machine via scp with
a key and without a password
here is what i'm doing:
1. ssh-keygen -t rsa
2. scp new_key.pub to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with password)
3. on remote_host rename new_key.pub to ~user/.ssh/athorized_keys
when i try:
# scp [EMAIL
Hi Kalin,
Don't worry about that message - I see the same thing here with an ssh
connection that succeeds. The try pubkey message displays a private
key file.
Did you check the sshd_config file on the server and the
/var/log/messages file for additional hints? If you see anything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kalin m wrote:
Hi Kalin,
Don't worry about that message - I see the same thing here with an ssh
connection that succeeds. The try pubkey message displays a private
key file.
Did you check the sshd_config file on the server and the
How, may I ask, does this work?
If you search the bash man file you can find this and lots of other useful
constructs, search for 'Parameter Expansion' - I'm not sure how much of this
relates to other Bourne Shell derivatives, but I don't imagine it would be
difficult to test it out.
`;
echo This directory is [${PWD}];
scp -qrp ${PWD}/* ethos:/${PWD}
###/usr/bin/scp -rqp -i /home/kline/.ssh/zeropasswd-id
${PWD}/* \ klin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/${PWD}
Question #1: is there any /bin/sh method of getting rid of
the
/usr? I switch off between my two computers
especially
on tao [FBSD] was
/home/kline:
P
#!/bin/sh
PWD=`pwd`;
echo This directory is [${PWD}];
scp -qrp ${PWD}/* ethos:/${PWD}
###/usr/bin/scp -rqp -i /home/kline/.ssh/zeropasswd-id
${PWD}/* \ klin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/${PWD}
Question #1: is there any /bin/sh method of getting rid
on tao [FBSD] was
/home/kline:
P
#!/bin/sh
PWD=`pwd`;
echo This directory is [${PWD}];
scp -qrp ${PWD}/* ethos:/${PWD}
###/usr/bin/scp -rqp -i /home/kline/.ssh/zeropasswd-id
${PWD}/* \ klin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/${PWD}
Question #1: is there any /bin/sh method of getting rid
/kline. The following sh script
worked
perfected when my home on tao [FBSD] was
/home/kline:
P
#!/bin/sh
PWD=`pwd`;
echo This directory is [${PWD}];
scp -qrp ${PWD}/* ethos:/${PWD}
###/usr/bin/scp -rqp -i /home/kline/.ssh/zeropasswd-id
${PWD}/* \ klin
[EMAIL PROTECTED
. The following sh script worked
perfected when my home on tao [FBSD] was /home/kline:
P
#!/bin/sh
PWD=`pwd`;
echo This directory is [${PWD}];
scp -qrp ${PWD}/* ethos:/${PWD}
###/usr/bin/scp -rqp -i /home/kline/.ssh/zeropasswd-id ${PWD}/* \ klin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/${PWD}
Question #1
This directory is [${PWD}];
scp -qrp ${PWD}/* ethos:/${PWD}
###/usr/bin/scp -rqp -i /home/kline/.ssh/zeropasswd-id
${PWD}/* \ klin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/${PWD}
Question #1: is there any /bin/sh method of getting rid of
the
/usr? I switch off between my two computers
especially
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to securely transfer files between machines
using either scp or sftp without giving the user a login shell on the
target machine. Put in another way: The user should be able to
transfer files but must not have an interactive login shell on the
target box.
Giving
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
[ ... ]
Giving the user a shell of /bin/true or something similar on the
target machine is not an option since scp doesn't seem to work in this
case.
Any ideas how this could be accomplished?
Take a look at /usr/ports/shells/scponly, or rsh for restricted shells,
more
Hello Ewald,
Thursday, May 3, 2007, 5:07:33 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to securely transfer files between machines
using either scp or sftp without giving the user a login shell on the
target machine. Put in another way: The user should be able to
transfer files but must
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to securely transfer files between machines
using either scp or sftp without giving the user a login shell on the
target machine.
Have you tried ports/shells/scponly?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
