On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
backyard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Aug 30, 2006, at 12:12 PM, backyard wrote:
with HT disabling in FreeBSD is more for the
security
issues about a potential exploit whereby one
--- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Aug 30, 2006, at 12:12 PM, backyard wrote:
with HT disabling in FreeBSD is more for the
security
issues about a potential exploit whereby one
process
in one pipe can access the priveledged information
of
a process in
Core 2 Duos have the EM64T extensions. Core Duos (Yonah) are a mobile
chip only, not a full line of processors like the Core 2 architecture
(Merom, Conroe, Woodcrest).
I suspect the Core 2 chips do not suffer from the same security
implications as HT-enabled processors. I'm not certain, but I
On Aug 30, 2006, at 12:12 PM, backyard wrote:
with HT disabling in FreeBSD is more for the security
issues about a potential exploit whereby one process
in one pipe can access the priveledged information of
a process in another pipe because the two cores share
one processor cache and thus one
